Can’t even say what they’re ‘terminating’
The two authors who each stated their sides of the teen pregnancy “solution” both portrayed the natural condition of teens who are expecting a child to be. . . not expecting a child.
Pro-lifers need to forcefeed the press and everyone else about just exactly what it is that teens are pregnant with: a human baby. Unfortunately, neither Janice Shaw Crause of Concerned Women for America nor Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood gave babies or motherhood any respect.
“Teen pregnancy,” “unintended pregnancies,” “health and safety,” and “teen birthrates” are anticeptic and outdated terminology. Why didn’t they mention adoption?!
Ms. Richards beats us over the head with the Planned Parenthood chant, “teaching our teens about sex is how they learn about prevention”; while Ms. Crause parades names and numbers from government welfare policies that have nothing whatever to do with the plight of innocent babies.
My solution is loosen up America’s adoption system because it is uptight. Hire a top-notch ad firm to promote transracial adoptions — most children who need to be adopted are nonwhite while most parents waiting to adopt are white.
Tax payers are forced to pay Planned Parenthood $305 million annually for this hate speech toward babies and motherhood. Nina Rhea Education and Outreach Precious Children of Portland Portland, Oregon