More green fields, less pesky hu­mans walk­ing all over them

The Washington Times Weekly - - Letters To The Editor -

The en­vi­ron­men­tal move­ment is just a eu­phemism for the pop­u­la­tion con­trol move­ment. The prob­lem is that the elit­ists be­hind all the move­ments just sim­ply can’t get enough pop­u­la­tion con­trol but for some rea­son they just can’t bring them­selves to say so.

The only en­vi­ron­men­tal­ist who has ac­tu­ally ad­mit­ted what that move­ment was up to was Ted Turner in 2008 when he said that the prob­lem with Amer­ica was “too many peo­ple,” but then he got real quiet real quick.

Gay lib, abor­tion, racial con­flict and sex­ual war­fare are eu­phemistic ap­proaches to pop­u­la­tion con­trol and the Demo­crat Party and the main­stream me­dia just go on and on for­ever about how won­der­ful all th­ese eu- phemisms are with never so much as even one lit­tle peep about pop­u­la­tion con­trol.

About the clos­est they ever come to men­tion­ing their real geno­ci­dal agenda con­cern­ing the en­vi­ron­ment or global warm­ing is that they have a prob­lem with car­bon diox­ide. But let’s just clear the air over this is­sue and make no mis­take about the par­tic­u­lar car­bon diox­ide emis­sions they want to elim­i­nate: those that are mainly ex­haled by hu­man be­ings.

There re­ally isn’t an en­vi­ron­men­tal cri­sis or even an en­vi­ron­men­tal move­ment. There are only elit­ists and eu­phemisms. And their abid­ing pur­suit of pop­u­la­tion con­trol. Larry Buntin Sand­ston, Vir­ginia

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.