Beijing aiding North Korea and Iran nuke efforts
A U.N. report that says China is allowing Iran and North Korea to collaborate on banned nuclear missile technology highlights the weakness of international efforts to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction and presents U.S. officials with a dilemma.
Lawmakers, congressional staffers and former officials told The Washington Times there has been clear evidence for more than a decade of China’s role assisting North Korea, Iran and Pakistan spread the knowhow and technology needed to make nuclear-armed ballistic missiles that can strike cities a continent away.
“China has been helping [. . . ] rogue states avoid the sting of sanctions,” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee told The Times, referr ing to U. N. sanctions imposed since 2006.
China on May 17 effectively blocked the release of the U.N. report, produced by a panel of experts monitoring the arms embargo against North Korea. The incident “proves that international sanctions [. . . ] are full of holes,” the Florida Republican added.
Successive U.S. administrations have relied on China as a partner in efforts to curb North Korea’s nuclear ambitions. As a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, China is also one of the five global powers that ultimately decide how international sanctions against Iran and North Korea enforced.
But critics charge that the Chinese have been playing a double game, winking at violations of the sanctions even as they signed up for them.
“It’s been so blatant that even the United Nations, which is typically very cautious in its assessments, has now come out
are and said it,” said one senior House staffer who has long followed the issue.
Now that China’s doubledealing has been exposed at the U.N., U.S. officials must decide how to proceed.
“China’s evident failure [to abide by its obligations under U.N. sanctions] should be a matter of great concern to U.S. offi- cials,” a Senate staffer said.
The spokesman for the Chinese mission to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment.
“There are smart people who say that China was responsible for making Pakistan a nuclear power in the first place,” Sen. James Webb, Virginia Democrat, said at a Senate hearing.
U.S. officials have long believed Pakistan got nuclear warhead designs from Beijing in the 1980s and then traded them to North Korea in the 1990’s in exchange for North Koreanbuilt ballistic missiles.
“The North Koreans were Chinese proxies in proliferating ballistic designs, components and missiles to Pakistan,”
Critics charge that the Chinese have been playing a double game, winking at violations of the sanctions even as they signed up for them. “It’s been so blatant that even the United Nations, which is typically ver y cautious in its assessments, has now come out and said it,” said one senior House staffer who has long followed the issue.
said John Tkacik, a former head of China analysis at the State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research.
Since 2006, both North Korea and Iran have been subject to multiple rounds of U.N. sanctions, which means any trade with them in nuclear weapons or missiles is illegal under international law.
A panel of experts submits regular independent reports on the sanctions.
At a closed-door session of the U.N. Security Council, Chinese Ambassador Li Baodong asked for more time to consult with Beijing about the release of the report, he said after the meeting. A Security Council diplomat told The Times that the request effectively delays any consideration or publication of the document for the time being.
The report does not accuse Beijing by name, but the diplomat confirmed to The Times that China was the “neighboring third country” cited in the report that had allowed “transshipment” of illicit weapons technology between Iran and North Korea.
“Iran, Nor th Korea, and Syria have not only been helping augment each other’s nuclear-and missile-capabilities, but they have been learning from each other how to circumvent U.S. and international efforts to stop them,” said Mrs. Ros-Lehtinen.
“The question now is, what will the administration do when presented with clear and compelling proof [in an international forum]?” asked Mr. Tkacik.