Middle East peace? Start with the truth
Editor’s note: This commentary is a slightly reworked version of one I wrote 11 years ago, without a doubt the most popular column I ever wrote. After it was published, I was immediately offered a regular column in The Jerusalem Post. The commentary went viral over a period of many months and was ultimately read by millions.
Iheard from friends that I had not seen for 20 or 30 years. I was inundated with tens of thousands of fan emails over the course of years. It resulted in television appearances, radio shows and even some plagiarism. With recent developments in Washington and Jerusalem, I thought it was time to republish the essentials.
Barack Obama says he’s got a new plan for peace in the Middle East. All we have to do, he says, is give the “Palestinians” their own state, with contiguous borders, carved out of the territory that Israel captured in the 1967 Six-Day War.
In fact, there’s nothing “new” about this plan at all. The plan actually dates back to 1948 when Israel was recreated. At that time, so-called “Palestinian” Arabs got their own state, but they rejected it along with the rest of the Arab world. But still the myth persists that the key to a Middle East peace is granting “Palestinians” a homeland and Muslims control over sites they consider holy.
Well, as an Arab-American journalist who has spent some time in the Middle East dodging more than my share of rocks and mortar shells, I’ve got to tell you that these are just phony claims for an asymmetrical, genocidal campaign against the Jews of Israel.
Isn’t it interesting that prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, there was no serious movement for a “Palestinian” homeland?
“Well, Farah,” you might say, “that was before the Israelis seized the West Bank and Old Jerusalem.”
That’s true. In the Six-Day War, Israel captured Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem. But they didn’t capture these territories from the “Palestinian Authority” or Hamas. They captured them from Jordan’s King Hussein. I can’t help but wonder why all these Palestinians suddenly discovered their national identity after Israel won the war.
The truth is that “Palestine” is no more real than NeverNever Land. The name was first used in A.D. 70 when the Romans committed genocide against the Jews, smashed the Temple and declared the land of Israel would be no more. From then on, the Romans promised, it would be known as “Pales- tine.” The name was derived from the Philistines, a Goliathian people conquered by the Jews centuries earlier. It was a way for the Romans to add insult to injury. They also tried to change the name of Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina, but that had even less staying power.
“Palestine” has never existed, before or since, as an au-
There is no language known as Palestinian. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians.
tonomous entity. It was ruled alternately by Rome, by Islamic and Christian crusaders, by the Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by the British after World War I. The British agreed to restore at least part of the land to the Jewish people as their homeland.
There is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs, indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent invention), Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc. Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands. Israel represents one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass.
But that’s too much for the Arabs. They want it all. And that is ultimately what the fighting in Israel is about today. Greed. Pride. Envy. Covetousness. No matter how many land concessions the Israelis make, it will never be enough.
What about Islam’s holy sites? There are none in Jerusalem. Shocked? You should be. I don’t expect you will ever hear this brutal truth from anyone else in the international media. It’s just not politically correct.
I know what you’re going to say: “Farah, the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem represent Islam’s third-most holy sites.”
Not true. In fact, the Quran says nothing about Jerusalem. It mentions Mecca hundreds of times. It mentions Medina countless times. It never mentions Jerusalem. And with good reason: There is no historical evidence to suggest Muhammad ever visited Jerusalem.
So, how did Jerusalem become the third-holiest site of Islam? Muslims today cite a vague passage in the Quran, the 17th Sura, entitled “The Night Journey.” It relates that in a dream or a vision, Muhammad was carried by night “from the sacred temple to the temple that is most remote, whose precinct we have blessed, that we might show him our signs. . . .” In the seventh century, some Muslims identified the two temples mentioned in this verse as being in Mecca and Jerusalem. And that’s as close as Islam’s connection with Jerusalem gets, myth, fantasy, wishful thinking. Meanwhile, Jews can trace their roots in Jerusalem back to the days of Abraham.
What’s the solution to the Middle East mayhem? Well, frankly, I don’t think there is a man-made solution to the violence. But if there is one, it needs to begin with truth. Pretending will only lead to more chaos. Treating a 5,000-year-old birthright backed by overwhelming historical and archaeological evidence equally with illegitimate claims, wishes and wants gives diplomacy and peacekeeping a bad name.
Joseph Farah is a nationally syndicated columnist.