Alcohol plays role in reports involving Secret Service
One U.S. Secret Service special agent drank too much alcohol and got caught after a minor traffic accident. Another agent got nabbed after driving into a telephone pole. Yet another got arrested after getting stuck in a ditch.
As the Secret Service deals with the ongoing fallout from an embarrassing prostitution scandal, newly released records are laying bare the extent of drunken driving and other alcohol-related misconduct over the years.
Arrests spanning nearly a decade were revealed in a highly redacted log on file with the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General, which released the 229-page document to The Washington Times and other media organizations through a Freedom of Information Act request.
When the records first became public two weeks ago, Secret Service officials were quick to point out that the vast majority of misconduct accusations received by the agency involved numerous complaints and did not specifically target Secret Service employees.
But while many of the log entries may seem frivolous, the records also revealed more than 40 individual entries that de- scribed arrests of agency personnel over their off-duty behavior, with about half of the cases involving alcohol.
The case log redacts the names of the agency employees, the dates of the criminal charges and the names of the law enforcement agencies making the arrests. In some cases, officials just described receiving information about an employee’s arrest, and those records often but do not always make clear whether an arrest occurred.
But in other instances, agency notations about pending court dates, arrests and specific charges leave little doubt that some Secret Service employees have had serious runins with law enforcement.
The documents also provide a window into the ongoing investigation into Secret Service agents preparing for President Obama’s trip to Colombia earlier this year who were implicated in a prostitution scandal. The report, confirming already public details, said 11 Secret Service personnel were potentially involved in the suspected misconduct.
The scandal prompted both a public apology and defense of the agency by Mark Sullivan, director of the Secret Service, who testified before a Senate committee in May. In his testimony, Mr. Sullivan suggested that alcohol may have played a role in the scandal.
“I have tried to figure this out for a month and a half — what would ever possess people to exhibit this type of behavior?” he said. “And I can tell you that I do not think this is indicative of the overwhelming majority of our men and women. [. . .] But I just think that between the alcohol, and I don’t know, the environment, these individuals did some really dumb things.”
Most of the records provide scant information about the outcomes of the cases and to what extent the employees faced disciplinary actions after arrests, if any.
Max Milien, a spokesman for the Secret Service, said the agency has its own internal Office of Professional Responsibility that investigates misconduct.
Citing agency policy, he declined to discuss any individual personnel actions but said federal rules allow for sanctions ranging from verbal or written warnings to suspension and dismissal.