Dirty Clin­ton campaign

The Washington Times Weekly - - Letters To The Editor - HESSIE L. HAR­RIS Silver Spring, Mary­land

Ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Wash­ing­ton Post ar­ti­cle, the Rus­sian gov­ern­ment in­ter­fered with the U.S. pres­i­den­tial elec­tion by ex­pos­ing the ways that the Clin­ton campaign sought to un­der­mine it. Per the Post nar­ra­tive, the CIA has con­cluded based on in­fer­ence and in­nu­endo but no hard ev­i­dence that the Rus­sian gov­ern­ment hacked emails of the Demo­cratic Na­tional Com­mit­tee and oth­ers, and ob­tained in­for­ma­tion about the many mis­deeds of the Clin­ton campaign. Then it gave that in­for­ma­tion to Ju­lian As­sange, who dis­closed it.

Mr. As­sange has de­nied that Rus­sia was his source, but he has strongly sug­gested that the leaks may have come from Demo­cratic Na­tional Com­mit­tee em­ployee Seth Rich, whose July mur­der on a Wash­ing­ton street re­mains un­solved — and largely ig­nored by the main­stream me­dia.

It is note­wor­thy that the Post, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and the mem­bers of Congress rais­ing the un­sub­stan­ti­ated ques­tion of Rus­sian in­ter­fer­ence to­tally ig­nore the ex­po­sure of the Clin­ton campaign’s near-crim­i­nal and crim­i­nal acts to in­ter­fere with the elec­tion process. The Clin­ton campaign ob­tained and pro­vided de­bate ques­tions to Hil­lary Clin­ton prior to those con­tests, al­low­ing Mrs. Clin­ton to give scripted an­swers. Also, in col­lu­sion with the mass me­dia, the campaign pro­vided Mrs. Clin­ton with in­ter­view ques­tions prior to tele­vi­sion in­ter­views, again al­low­ing her to give scripted an­swers. The campaign planted peo­ple in Mrs. Clin­ton’s town hall meet­ings and ral­lies for this same pur­pose, and it sent op­er­a­tives to dis­rupt Don­ald Trump ral­lies, and ha­rass, in­tim­i­date and in­jure Trump sup­port­ers there, as well as mar and de­stroy pub­lic and pri­vate prop­erty in the en­vi­rons.

And let us not for­get that Ge­orge Soros pro­vided vot­ing ma­chines that at­tempted to record votes cast for Mr. Trump as hav­ing been cast for Mrs. Clin­ton.

The Wash­ing­ton Post is ques­tion­ing the elec­tion re­sults without ac­knowl­edg­ing the ex­posed Clin­ton campaign’s nu­mer­ous at­tempts to sab­o­tage the elec­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.