Trump makes move against `Oba­macare' Frus­trated by Con­gress' fail­ures, the pres­i­dent takes ex­ec­u­tive ac­tion

Tulsa World - - Datelines - By Ri­cardo Alonso-Zaldivar warned that some state and fed­eral re­quire­ments. Other el­e­ments of the White House plan in­clude: in­sur­ance

WASH­ING­TON — Frus­trated over set­backs in Con­gress, Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump wielded his rule-mak­ing power Thurs­day to launch an end run that might get him closer to his goal of re­peal­ing and re­plac­ing “Oba­macare.”

Whether Trump's ex­ec­u­tive or­der will be the play that breaks through isn't clear.

Ex­perts say con­sumers aren't likely to see ma­jor changes any time soon, although the White House is promis­ing lower costs and more op­tions.

Some ex­perts hard-won pro­tec­tions for older adults and peo­ple in poor health could be un­der­mined by the skinny lower-pre­mium plans that Trump or­dered fed­eral agen­cies to fa­cil­i­tate.

Oth­ers say the pres­i­dent's plans will have a mod­est im­pact and might even help some con­sumers who don't now ben­e­fit from fi­nan­cial as­sis­tance un­der the Obama-era law.

Peo­ple on dif­fer­ent sides of the po­lar­ized health care de­bate did agree that it will take months for the govern­ment bu­reau­cracy to turn Trump's broad-brush goals into ac­tual poli­cies that af­fect mil­lions of peo­ple who buy their own health in­sur­ance poli­cies.

“To­day is only the be­gin­ning,” Trump said at the sign­ing cer­e­mony. He promised new mea­sures in com­ing months, adding, “We're go­ing to also pres­sure Con­gress very strongly to fin­ish the re­peal and re­place of `Oba­macare' once and for all.”

Democrats de­nounced Trump's or­der as more “sab­o­tage,” while Repub­li­cans called it “bold ac­tion” to help con­sumers. A ma­jor small busi­ness group praised the pres­i­dent, while doc­tors, in­sur­ers, and state reg­u­la­tors said they have con­cerns and are wait­ing to hear de­tails.

One of the main ideas from the ad­min­is­tra­tion in­volves eas­ing the way for groups of em­ploy­ers to spon­sor cov­er­age that can be mar­keted across the land. That re­flects Trump's long­stand­ing be­lief that com­pe­ti­tion across state lines will lead to lower pre­mi­ums.

Those “as­so­ci­a­tion health plans” could be shielded from

• Eas­ing cur­rent re­stric­tions

on short-term poli­cies that last less than a year — an op­tion for peo­ple mak­ing a life tran­si­tion, from re­cent col­lege grad­u­ates to early re­tirees.

• Al­low­ing em­ploy­ers to set

aside pre-tax dol­lars so work­ers can use the money to buy an in­di­vid­ual health pol­icy.

“This could be much ado about noth­ing or a very big deal, depend­ing on how the reg­u­la­tions get writ­ten,” said Larry Le­vitt of the non­par­ti­san Kaiser Fam­ily Foun­da­tion head­quar­tered in Cal­i­for­nia. “The in­tent of the ex­ec­u­tive or­der is clear — to dereg­u­late the in­sur­ance mar­ket. … It's un­clear how far the ad­min­is­tra­tion will ul­ti­mately go.”

Le­vitt said as­so­ci­a­tion health plans and short-term health in­sur­ance poli­cies could be de­signed to lure health­ier peo­ple away from the state in­sur­ance mar­kets cre­ated by the Obama health law. They'd of­fer lower pre­mi­ums to those will­ing to ac­cept fewer ben­e­fits. That would drive up costs for con­sumers in the al­ready-shaky “Oba­macare” mar­kets, mak­ing them less at­trac­tive for in­sur­ers and rais­ing sub­sidy ex­penses for the govern­ment.

House Demo­cratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a state­ment that “the Amer­i­can peo­ple over­whelm­ingly re­jected Trump­care, but Pres­i­dent Trump is still spite­fully try­ing to sab­o­tage their health care, drive up their costs and gut their cov­er­age.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from USA

© PressReader. All rights reserved.