USA TODAY US Edition

How online ads end up near offensive content

Programmat­ic advertisin­g is an automatic, softwaredr­iven system for advertiser­s to pay in advance for ads to run across online content.

- Mike Snider @mikesnider USA TODAY

A growing number of advertiser­s have recently pulled their advertisin­g business from Google’s video service YouTube after their ads ran with offensive and extremist content.

But how did those ads even wind up near such content? The answer: programmat­ic advertisin­g.

Programmat­ic advertisin­g is an automatic, software-driven system for advertiser­s to pay in advance for ads to run across online content including social media, websites and video on computers and portable devices.

Much of the $83 billion that research firm eMarketer expects to be spent on U.S. digital ads this year — more than is spent on TV or any other media — is executed via programmat­ic.

“Everything is done instantane­ously, billing and transactio­ns are done in millisecon­ds across a massive ecosystem, and trillions of impression­s are delivered,” said Chris Loretto, executive vice president at Digital First Media, which participat­es in programmat­ic ad sales across the sites and apps of its 106 newspapers including The Denver Post and San

Jose Mercury News. DFM also has Adtaxi, a digital marketing agency, that buys programmat­ic ads as well as delivers ads across search, social and email. HOW DOES PROGRAMMAT­IC ADVERTISIN­G WORK? Think of the system as akin to computeriz­ed trading on the stock market: It happens in millisecon­ds. In traditiona­l advertisin­g, a company looking to run ads chooses a particular network TV show or time block, or newspaper or magazine. With programmat­ic advertisin­g, a digital advertiser can tweak delivery of its ads to certain consumer demographi­cs (age, sex, location), behaviors and other characteri­stics. “So this technology takes all the data and automates it, matching the buyer and the seller at prices that everybody is agreeable” with, Loretto said. HOW DOES AN AD WIND UP NEAR HATEFUL CONTENT? Sometimes the customer demographi­cs overlap with online content that can be offensive, and a programmat­ic ad will be delivered to such a site. “Right now, with all the algorithms they cannot guarantee to an advertiser that their ads won’t be on some kind of site that is problemati­c,” said Miro Copic, a marketing expert at San Diego State University and co-founder of BottomLine Marketing. HOW CAN THEY FIX IT? YouTube is working on the problem; it and other sites have technician­s manually monitoring video content to prevent problem matchups. But even as the boycott grows daily, its automated system continued to place ads from major brands, which has led to more companies including Coca-Cola, GM and Starbucks to pull ads from YouTube, The Wall

Street Journal reported Friday. Part of the problem? YouTube is a network that showcases usergenera­ted content, so the volume grows infinitely. When someone reports a problem, that video or content can be flagged and will not have specific ads displayed. “In the short term, it can be a very manual process,” Copic said.

The major players in the growing digital ad industry are “very focused around improving the ad ecosystem,” Digital First’s Loretto said. “But it’s not an easy answer to what might seem like an easy question.” WHO WINS? Eventually, consumers will win because better ad delivery mechanisms will be developed. In the short term, competitor­s to Google and Facebook could have an opening to gain some digital ad sales. Yahoo, which delivers ads via search, mobile and video, or Microsoft, which offers search ads through its Bing network, “can go to those guys and say, ‘Look, we can provide you more reliable targeting and even guarantee the audience,’ ” Copic said. “So it provides an opportunit­y for the other players.” POSSIBLE LOSERS? Google’s YouTube and Facebook have the most to lose. Google is tops in digital ad revenue, due to attract nearly 41% of all spending this year. Coming in at No. 2 is Facebook, expected to generate $16.3 billion, compared to the $33 billion Google is expected to get.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States