USA TODAY US Edition

HOW THE IPHONE CHANGED THE TELECOMMUN­ICATIONS INDUSTRY

Your wireless carrier used to matter more than the actual phone

- Rachel Sandler @rachsandl

Before the first iPhone went on sale, Apple had gotten good at building computers and making iPods. But in the early 2000s, engineers at Apple had started working on something entirely new — a mobile device that combined a phone, an iPod and a computer.

Everything about the iPhone was Apple’s: the phone itself, the design, the operating system. The only thing Apple needed was a network that allowed users to talk, text and browse the Internet. Enter AT&T’s mobile services company, formerly known as Cingular Wireless.

Apple and the wireless carrier struck a deal before the iPhone was first announced at the Macworld Conference in January 2007. The company would be the iPhone’s exclusive carrier. But the agreement was a risk. The carrier was concerned about becoming a dumb pipe, or a mere conduit for data and minutes, instead of a company that could also provide services and applicatio­ns on top of its network, said Raj Aggarwal, a consultant on the deal for Apple.

Verizon turned down a similar offer from Apple, USA TODAY reported at the time.

“Cingular was not the No. 1 network at time, so they were much more open and comfortabl­e with having a phone on their network like the iPhone,” Aggarwal said. “They thought they could use it as a way to gain market share in the long run even if they were giving things up.”

AT&T is now the No. 2 wireless carrier, behind Verizon Wireless. Its deal with Apple would start a fundamenta­l shift for cellphone companies.

Increasing­ly, consumers’ brand loyalty is now to the platform or the manufactur­er, such as Apple, Google or Samsung. At the same time, carriers were forced to beef up their networks to support the increased data needs of the smartphone boom. As a result, experts say, the wireless industry is becoming increasing­ly commoditiz­ed, meaning there is little difference between what each carrier offers.

“They (carriers) were downgraded to just infrastruc­ture providers while others were benefiting from the next wave of growth. The iPhone really played the key role there because that was really a game changer, put- ting a computer into everyone’s pocket,” said Florian Gröne, an analyst at Pricewater­house-Coopers who studies the telecommun­ications industry.

Before the advent of the iPhone, if someone wanted to buy a cellphone, he or she would go to the carrier first. The phone itself — and who made it — didn’t matter as much as the service it ran on. The quality of the network mattered in the early days, and there was pent-up demand for a Verizon iPhone that became available in 2011. As it grew in market share, the iPhone shook up this dynamic, creating high demand for Apple’s iPhone instead of a phone on AT&T or a phone on Verizon.

“The iPhone certainly made the brand matter. It sort of went from ‘the carrier was in control’ to you deciding what device you wanted or what carrier you would move to so you could get that device,” said Chris Silva, an analyst at Gartner who focuses on the telecommun­ications industry.

Now, nearly all wireless companies have comparable coverage across the country. And as a result, the fear carriers had about becoming a dumb pipe a decade ago is, in a sense, coming to pass, experts say.

“It’s not about the data, it’s not about the call quality. ... It’s about the unique features these carriers can provide,” Silva said.

As it grew in market share, the iPhone created high demand for the device itself instead of a phone on AT&T or a phone on Verizon.

 ?? PAUL SAKUMA, AP ?? Carriers have been forced to beef up their networks to support the growing data needs of the smartphone boom.
PAUL SAKUMA, AP Carriers have been forced to beef up their networks to support the growing data needs of the smartphone boom.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States