USA TODAY US Edition

Give Beltre trip to Hall

3,000 career hits should spark eventual induction, not arouse suspicion,

- Bob Nightengal­e bnighten@usatoday.com USA TODAY Sports

Baseball’s steroid era has largely come and gone, but it continues to nag at our conscience.

We are supposed to be celebratin­g Adrian Beltre’s 3,000th hit in Texas, but a day later we are listening to a national radio host casting doubt on the feat’s authentici­ty.

We’re in Cooperstow­n, N.Y., honoring the newest class of the Hall of Fame, but it’s impossible to ignore the mostly private assertions that Pudge Rodriguez and Jeff Bagwell cheated their way to the Hall.

We see monstrous home runs being hit these days, and, instead of marveling in awe, we’re blaming it on the ball.

Did the steroid era irreparabl­y gash our enjoyment of the game?

Can’t we just savor extraordin­ary accomplish­ments without everyone automatica­lly questionin­g its validity, as if we’re protecting ourselves in case a positive drug test lurks around the corner?

Should we really entertain the reckless idea that Beltre is a steroid user simply because he’s still one of the best third basemen in the game at 38?

“I’m not saying Adrian Beltre unequivoca­lly did it,” Doug Gottlieb of Fox Sports said on his radio show, “I’m saying, ‘Hey, we’ve all been fooled before.’ And we have some markers that could paint the tale of a guy who could possibly be ahead of the curve and hasn’t tested positive for it.”

How dare he utter those words, so we lash back, saying it’s cruel and almost immoral for anyone to attack Beltre’s integrity.

Why, unless something changed in another early-morning tweet from the Oval Office, we still live in a country where you are innocent until proved guilty.

So Beltre is innocent until proved otherwise with a dirty test.

Beltre, only the third player to play the majority of his games at third base to reach 3,000 hits, has passed every drug test he has taken for the last 13 years of his major league career. The skeptics will remind you that Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens never flunked a drug test either; the same with the 13 players who were nabbed in the 2013 Biogenesis scandal.

Skeptics look at Beltre’s 2004 season, when he hit .334 with 48 home runs and 121 RBI with the Los Angeles Dodgers. Yet he was just 25. It was his walk year before free agency. He did the same thing in 2010 with the Boston Red Sox when he hit .321 with a league-high 49 doubles before free agency, and no one uttered a word.

Skeptics wonder how he’s able to be so productive in his late 30s, hitting .300 with 32 homers and 104 RBI last year at 37, but they don’t see the discipline involved in maintainin­g that level of play over the last decade.

Come on, he has to be clean, right?

Well, the uncomforta­ble fact is that we have absolutely no idea whether Beltre — or any major leaguer, from situationa­l reliever to franchise player — ever used performanc­e-enhancing drugs in his career.

I don’t know. And you don’t know. Beltre says no. But with the exception of Mark McGwire and David Segui, no player in the history of the Hall of Fame ballot has admitted to steroid use.

So who you going to believe? What are we supposed to believe? We really don’t know who is clean today or who was dirty back in the day.

We had our strong suspicions in the steroid era.

You had to be a fool, or utterly naive, not to know steroids were out of control in baseball in the 1990s, when middle infielders began resembling middle linebacker­s.

It was the drug that produced the infamous home run race between McGwire and Sammy Sosa, regenerati­ng interest in a sport struggling for an identity after the 1994 strike that canceled the World Series.

The narrative today that journalist­s turned their back to the steroid era is absurd. Did we know the cheating was rampant? Absolutely. There were plenty of stories written about steroid use in the early days, including by myself, but no one really seemed to care.

Now, did we ever print names of those we strongly suspected, names of players being whispered in our ears, or even from those who privately admitted to steroid use? Absolutely not.

Sorry. Just like today, the idea of being sued for libel has a funny way of being frowned upon by our bosses.

The Baseball Writers Associatio­n of America instead spoke out in a different way, expressing its suspicions in Hall of Fame balloting. It’s why it took Bagwell seven years after his eligibilit­y to finally be voted into the Hall. Mike Piazza didn’t make it until his fourth try. Rodriguez made it on his first attempt, but the greatest allaround catcher of his era squeaked in with 76% of the vote amid concerns of his massive weight loss that coincided with drug testing.

None of those players failed a drug test. Again, neither did Bonds nor Clemens, but that won’t stop several inductees from boycotting the Cooperstow­n ceremony when Bonds and Clemens enter the Hall of Fame.

And Bonds and Clemens one day will be in inducted into the Hall of Fame. Bank on it. Considerin­g we already are permitting players with suspicions or links to PEDs into the Hall of Fame now, why in the world should we stop the two greatest players of the steroid era into the Hall?

Bonds and Clemens never failed a drug test. They were never suspended. They even went to federal court to prove their innocence — and won.

I vote for them every year on my Hall of Fame ballot and will continue until they’re elected. I’ll vote for Beltre, too. You’re talking not only about one of the greatest third basemen ever, but if you ask anyone who ever played with Beltre, they’ll tell you he was the greatest teammate, too. He’s perhaps the most respected player in the game today.

So did he ever use performanc­e-enhancing drugs at any time in his career? I don’t know. Neither do you. And you know what? That’s OK, too.

 ?? TIM HEITMAN, USA TODAY SPORTS ?? Adrian Beltre’s 3,000 career hits should be a cause for celebratio­n, not suspicion.
TIM HEITMAN, USA TODAY SPORTS Adrian Beltre’s 3,000 career hits should be a cause for celebratio­n, not suspicion.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States