Dealer add-ons pad car costs
Study claims Latinos see markups higher than other groups
Auto dealers are jacking up car prices with add-ons — including extended warranties, dent protection and credit insurance — and, in the process, appear to be discriminating against Latino customers, a non-profit group finds.
A study by the National Consumer Law Center found:
uAdd- on products were sold at prices far above dealer costs. One dealer sold 1,000 window etching products, each with a dealer cost of $16 and a charge to the consumer of $189, for a markup of $173 or 1,081%.
uCompanies that provided car financing played a role in allowing excessive and discriminatory markups of add-on products. In order to get more business from dealers, some creditors allow higher markups for add-on products.
uDealers inconsistently priced add-on products, which led to pricing discrimination. Latinos were charged higher markups than non-Latinos. Individual dealerships charged some consumers many times more than other consumers for the same product for which the dealer’s cost was fixed.
“Pricing of add-ons is something we’ve been looking at for years,” said John Van Alst, the study’s primary author. “We’re an organization that’s focused on low-income consumers, and we’ve seen a lot of abuses related to add-ons.”
What’s more, he said, even if customers didn’t want to buy the add-ons, they often felt forced to just to bring the long, arduous negotiations to an end.
The Boston-based organization’s 58-page study, “Auto AddOns Add Up,” looked at data on about 3 million add-on products sold from September 2009 through June 2015 at about 3,000 dealerships nationwide. It was published this month. The key findings: “Add-ons lead to unreasonably high and inconsistent pricing, and Hispanic customers were charged more.”
The study also urged some public policy recommendations that would make pricing more transparent.
In response to the study, the Michigan Automobile Dealers Association, a statewide non-profit trade organization representing more than 650 new-vehicle fran- chises, said it is not unusual for dealers to charge different prices for different products for different vehicles.
That’s just part of the freemarket system, said Terry Burns, MADA’s executive vice president. Customers who don’t want to pay a certain price can negotiate a better deal or simply go down the road to another dealer that wants their business, he added.
Burns, who said he had not read the study, pointed out that many variables go into pricing.
He dismissed the study’s claims of dealer discrimination.
“There is no disparate treatment,” Burns said. “We have different programs, protocols, procedures and paperwork that we complete on each transaction to make sure everyone is treated fairly. But that doesn’t mean that everybody has the same prices or financing because everyone is different.”
The study examined a long list of products including key, tire and dent protection plans, prepaid maintenance plans, warranty plans, credit insurance and guaranteed auto protection, which, in a collision, covers the difference between the outstanding debt on the vehicle and the insurance payout.
The source of the data was not disclosed, but the study said it did “verify the accuracy of individual data points through several sources including litigation, newspaper articles, bankruptcy filings and other independent sources.”
To determine ethnicity, the non-profit said it looked for Hispanic surnames and cross-referenced them with loan data to verify them.
Aside from add-ons, Mark Scarpelli, chairman of the National Automobile Dealers Association, said this month that incentive programs in which dealers get cash from automakers for meeting sales goals can lead to wild discrepancies in prices between dealerships.
“Any dealer who’s had to deal with these programs can tell you that they are not only trust killers, but they’re brand killers too,” he said. “Not being able to offer two customers the same price on the exact same equipped vehicle, just because they came into the dealership on different days of the month, destroys consumer confidence.”
Marisabel Torres, a senior policy analyst at Washington-based advocacy group UnidosUS, said the discrimination findings were especially troubling.
“The fact that Latino consumers were charged in excess for unnecessary add-ons in the car buying process demonstrates a need for increased oversight in this sector of the market,” she said. “We urge state and federal authorities to further investigate and bring enforcement actions against those found to be engaging in these discriminatory practices.”
“We’re an organization that’s focused on low-income consumers, and we’ve seen a lot of abuses related to add-ons.”
John Van Alst, primary author of the study by the National Consumer Law Center