Train plan keeps chugging along
California downscales high-speed project
LOS ANGELES – California could still bring the nation’s first high-speed rail train to reality, proponents said – even if the size falls short of the original grand plans – and that could encourage other states to follow suit.
Wednesday, a day after Gov. Gavin Newsom announced he would scale back plans for a bullet train connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles, backers focused on a smaller segment being built and said that gave them cause for hope.
Newsom, who took office last month, said Tuesday that extending the rail line to San Francisco and Los Angeles – which are about 400 miles apart – would, at $77 billion, “cost too much and, respectfully, take too long.” Instead, he said, he wanted to complete a shorter segment under construction across the state’s Central Valley.
He followed up with a tweet that indicated he is committed to the completed line over the long term.
Rail supporters found cause for cheer.
“It’s so important to get one up and running,” said Andy Kunz, CEO of the U.S. High Speed Rail Association, an advocacy group. By focusing on a single working leg, Newsom can show people the potential – building enthusiasm that could foster other projects around the country, he said.
Instead of connecting two of the nation’s largest cities, the 119-mile line will run through sparsely populated farmland between the agricultural hubs Bakersfield and Merced.
Paul Dyson, president of the Rail Passengers Association of California, said a line that won’t connect San Francisco and Los Angeles doesn’t make sense. “We’re in favor of high-speed rail, but it has to be a viable proposition.”
Critics of the project have cited costs and other issues. State Auditor Elaine Howle released a scathing audit on the rail’s overall mismanagement. Rushed construction and poor management cost the rail authority $600 million in budget overruns, according to the document. The 87-page audit found that the authority’s decision to start construction in 2013, before it had secured necessary property and utility clearances, contributed to the overruns.
Rail supporters said they still hold out hope for a fully completed project connecting California’s two population centers.
Karen Philbrick, executive director of the Mineta Transportation Institute at San Jose State University in the Bay Area, said the line is needed as a long-term solution to the state’s housing crisis.
“I am thrilled the project will continue in the Central Valley, but I think it’s a missed opportunity not to extend it as originally conceived,” she said.
The project was needed to allow workers at the high-paying tech jobs in the Bay Area to live in suburbs far from the city and commute in, Philbrick said, noting that California has been adding jobs at a 7-to-1 ratio to its ability to add housing.
Newsom’s decision – and whether the completed Bakersfield-to-Merced line is viewed as a success – could have direct bearing on other high-speed rail projects around the country. Proposals have included a Tampa-Orlando route in Florida that was backed early in the administration of President Barack Obama, a DallasHouston line in Texas and a Portland-Seattle line in the Pacific Northwest.
President Donald Trump weighed in after Newsom’s announcement Tuesday, demanding California repay billions to the federal government since the plans are being scaled back.