APC Australia

Intel 10980XE

A refreshed refresh just isn’t good enough.

- Chris Szewczyk

It was as recently as early 2017 that Intel’s high end desktop platform peaked at ten cores. Then everything changed with the release of AMD’s 1st-gen 16-core Threadripp­er 1950X. Intel’s response was the i9-7980XE – an 18-core monster sourced from its enterprise Xeon range. This kept Intel on top until AMD launched the powerful 32-core Threadripp­er 2990WX, which Intel countered with a refresh of the 7980XE – the 9980XE.

Now that the quicker Zen 2 Threadripp­er 3rd-gen is here, and with a 64-core model to come, AMD has dramatical­ly upped the ante. Intel’s response? Refresh the refreshed 9980XE into the 10980XE. Refreshing once raises an eyebrow, but twice is stretching the bounds of credibilit­y, and that’s where we are now with the i9-10980XE.

Though Intel refers to the 10980XE as a 10th generation CPU, there’s really not a lot different architectu­rally between the 7980XE, 9980XE and 10980XE. All of them are based on the same Skylake-X silicon with its 18 cores and 36 threads, 1MB of L2 cache per-core and 24.75MB of L3 cache. All three CPUs share a 14nm manufactur­ing process. Intel’s 10nm volume manufactur­ing seems as far away as ever.

That’s not to say they are 100% the same, as there are a few difference­s both under the hood and more notably, with revised pricing. Where the 9980XE sold for $2,799, the 10980XE sells for a much more enticing $1,799. That alone makes the 10980XE significan­tly more attractive from a price/ performanc­e and priceper-core measure.

Compared to the 9980XE, lightly threaded Turbo Boost frequencie­s have increased, up to a maximum of 4.8GHz with a single core. There’s also some additional subsets to the AVX512 instructio­n set. Intel calls these instructio­ns DL Boost. These are aimed at accelerati­ng deep learning and AI workloads.

The memory support specificat­ions have improved, with the 10980XE supporting up to 256GB of DDR4-2933 memory, double the 128GB of DDR4-2666 capacity supported by the 9980XE. Cascade Lake-X CPUs get a modest PCIe lane increase too, though there’s no sign of PCIe 4.0 support. All the models in the range support 48 PCIe lanes, which add to those coming from the motherboar­d chipset give you up to 72 lanes.

Speaking of motherboar­ds, most manufactur­ers are releasing updated X299 models with things like Wi-Fi 6 and faster-thanGigabi­t LAN included, which are welcome developmen­ts on 2019 HEDT-class systems.

The 10980XE at $1,799 has an added benefit of not forcing users to upgrade to an expensive new motherboar­d as first generation X299 motherboar­ds will accept 10th generation CPUs after a BIOS update. So while Intel is price competitiv­e in the HEDT market, unfortunat­ely it’s faced with the headache of competitio­n from below as well – particular­ly from the excellent 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X. It’s this CPU that’s arguably the biggest competitio­n for the 10980XE, and for that matter the likes of the 3900X vs. the rest of the 10th generation lineup.

With Intel struggling to compete with AMD’s core counts, it’s no surprise that the 10980XE is destroyed by the 3960X under highly threaded workloads. It’s somewhat more competitiv­e under lightly threaded loads, but that’s not why people should buy HEDT platforms. Power consumptio­n is also concerning – a stock 10980XE consumes around 229W under full load, compared to the AMD 3950X & 3960X’s 131W and 268W respective­ly. This indicates Intel is on the limit of how aggressive­ly it can clock Cascade Lake-X. The 10980XE has a lot of OC headroom, though, with its default thermals and performanc­e per-watt already high you’ll need some serious cooling to tame it when overclocki­ng.

In summary, there’s good and bad news for the 10980XE. First, the bad news. Intel is facing competitio­n from AMD’s CPUs from above and below across its entire HEDT range. Threadripp­er smashes it in performanc­e, while the likes of the desktop Ryzen 3900X and 3950X are competitiv­e while offering better value. The time for refreshes is over. Intel needs a new architectu­re and manufactur­ing process or its faces a very difficult couple of years ahead.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that the 10980XE will provide a very strong and relatively affordable performanc­e boost for users coming from the lower core-count 7000- and 9000-series processors, without the need to buy an expensive new motherboar­d. Software with AVX512 support will also benefit. Sadly there’s not too much more than that. It’s not a bad CPU in isolation, but the competitio­n is simply too strong. How Intel follows this up over the next year or so will be fascinatin­g to watch.

Verdict

The 10980XE isn’t a bad processor, but the competitio­n is simply too good. Intel needs something new.

“It’s somewhat more competitiv­e under lightly threaded loads, but that’s not why people should buy HEDT platforms”.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia