APC Australia

Razer Blade 18

The leading gaming ultrabook maker releases a giant 18-inch gaming laptop, but is it a beauty, or just a beast?

-

$7,999 | razer.com/au-en

If you’re a fan of desktop-replacing gaming laptops, then 2023 is the year of your dreams, with a range of manufactur­ers producing 18-inch monster workstatio­ns like the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 that we covered in the last issue (APC 521, p36). The next colossus to enter the ring is the Blade 18 from Razer. For the most part this device offers an almost identical set of specs to the Asus offering, but it’s described by Razer to be just 2.19cm thick – almost a whole centimetre thinner than the ROG Strix Scar 18’s 3.1cm thick chassis. This is an impressive feat of engineerin­g, but it’s perhaps not the whole truth since while the chassis is around 2.2cm thick if you decide to strategica­lly omit the device’s feet, it sits closer to 2.6cm off a table when closed which makes it feel not as different to the Scar 18 as it looks on paper. The other caveat is that this compressed chassis also unfortunat­ely impacts overall performanc­e.

The Blade 18 that we tested came with an Intel Core i9-13950HX CPU, 32GB of RAM and a 175W Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 with a manufactur­er RRP of $8,499. Now, we have seen this device going for $7,999 from third-party retailers, but even this discounted offering is more expensive than the $7,499 Strix Scar 18. This price difference might be justified by the additional engineerin­g involved in making the Blade 18 thinner, but only if the Asus device didn’t have a higher clocked i9-13980HX CPU included in that equation. The Blade 18 with an i9-13980HX actually retails for $9,399… so if you have your heart set on the Blade, be prepared to pay a lot more for it.

There’s no doubt that people would prefer a gaming laptop that is extra portable, but for the segment going for the extra large 18-inch form factor, we suspect that portabilit­y is going to take a back seat to performanc­e and gaming experience. Sure, there will always be customers for whom price is not a predominan­t factor, but unfortunat­ely the Razer Blade 18’s performanc­e was well behind the Strix Scar 18 too. For general work tasks it was similar, but for CPU specific multi-threaded tasks the device was up to 45-percent behind when using a balanced power mode.

After swapping to performanc­e mode and running the Razer Cortex boost feature, which does things like disable CPU sleep mode and stop automatic updates, you can get these scores up to within 10 percent of the Strix Scar 18, but the Blade 18’s fans kick up quickly and run loudly in order to achieve these performanc­es. We also usually only test machines in their standard balanced mode, so the Strix Scar 18 could in fact offer much better performanc­e if all parameters are consistent.

The Blade 18 uses the same 18-inch 240Hz, G-Sync compatible, DCI-P3 QHD-plus display, which is a good balance of resolution and speed that’ll look great in a wide variety of gaming styles. Battery life was a little shy of 3 hours in 1080p movie playback, but it only lasted 1.5 hours in our Home Office test which means there’s room for improvemen­t in light work optimisati­on.

A large-format gaming PC that sacrifices performanc­e and adds fan noise for a thinner chassis.

Joel Burgess

------

 ?? ?? W11 Home; 18-inch IPS display at 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, 100% DCI-P3, G-Sync Compatible; 240Hz, 3ms response time; Intel Core i9-13950HX CPU; Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 (175W); 32GB RAM; 2TB Gen 4 PCIe SSD; 91Wh battery (2h57min 1080p movie playback); 40 x 27.5 x 2.2cm; 3.1kg.
W11 Home; 18-inch IPS display at 2560 x 1600 pixel resolution, 100% DCI-P3, G-Sync Compatible; 240Hz, 3ms response time; Intel Core i9-13950HX CPU; Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 (175W); 32GB RAM; 2TB Gen 4 PCIe SSD; 91Wh battery (2h57min 1080p movie playback); 40 x 27.5 x 2.2cm; 3.1kg.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia