Peer to peer: Covid-19 and transforming jury trials in Australia

1. Productivity Commission 2020, Report on Government Services 2020, Canberra

2. Productivity Commission 2021, Report on Government Services 2021, Canberra

3. Richardson T 2020, ‘SA courts' online revolution as virus wreaks havoc', Indaily, 18 May

4. Goodman-delahunty J et al. 2009, Practices, policies and procedures that influence juror satisfaction in Australia, Research and public policy series no. 87, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology

5. Cheatle v The Queen [1993] HCA 44 < http://eresources.hcourt. gov.au/showbyhandle/1/8646>.

6. Power J 2017, ‘How to get out of jury duty: Planets not aligning is not a good excuse', The Sydney Morning Herald, 21 October

7. Anthony T and Longman C (2017), ‘Blinded by the white: A comparative analysis of jury challenges on racial grounds', International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 6(3): 25-46

8. Krisenthal P 2015, ‘Judge Alone Trials in NSW: Practical Considerations'

9. Mcclellan P 2011, ‘ The future role of the Judge – umpire, manager, mediator or service provider', paper presented at the University of NSW, Sydney, 1 December

10. Trimboli L 2008, Juror understanding of judicial instructions in criminal trials, Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 119, NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research

11. Warner K, Davis J & Underwood J, 2011 ‘ The Jury Experience: Insights from the Tasmanian Jury Study', The Judicial Review, Vol. 10, 2011

12. ‘How Covid-19 is driving public-sector innovation' 2020, The Economist

13. NSW Government 2020, ‘Building and tech aid recovery and

justice', 17 November

14. Tait D et al. 2017, Towards a Distributed Courtroom

15. Mulcahy L, Rowden E & Teeder W 2020, Testing the case for a virtual courtroom with a physical jury hub: Second evaluation of a virtual trial pilot study conducted by JUSTICE.