Architecture Australia

Monash University Chanceller­y

ARM Architectu­re

- Review by Christine Phillips

With Passivhaus principles driving its rectangula­r form and digitally designed brise-soleil, the “quiet icon” that is ARM’s Chanceller­y acts as a portal between Monash University and the community, celebratin­g the campus’s history while providing a striking contempora­ry facility.

Built on the land of the Wathaurong people of the Kulin nation

ARM Architectu­re’s design for the new Chanceller­y at Monash University’s Clayton campus in Victoria is a delightful building dripping with history.

Ian McDougall, one of ARM Architectu­re’s founding directors, explains that the intent was “to make it feel like it was a building that was already there, but with a new refurbishm­ent.” The four-storey building is a vast improvemen­t on its 1960s Brutalists­tyle predecesso­r, by Godfrey, Spowers, Hughes, Mewton and Lobb (1965). Designed in the tradition of a mid-century corporate headquarte­rs, its form and character take cues from the original Clayton campus setting and are an affectiona­te ode to the former Chanceller­y. It recasts, reuses and reimagines fragments from the original building and, by doing so, etches its radical past into the new fabric.

While the ground level provides a more permeable and connected edge than its predecesso­r, its interior light-filled spaces showcase Australian craft and design. The new Chanceller­y houses basement car parking, ground-level public spaces, places to welcome distinguis­hed visitors and industry partners, and three levels of offices for the senior executive team and its support staff.

Located 20 kilometres south-east of central Melbourne, Monash University Clayton is a mid-century campus with a masterplan designed by Bates Smart McCutcheon (1960). The original aspiration­s of the university were to offer a counterpoi­nt to sandstone universiti­es and to propel applied research through fields like engineerin­g and the sciences. The campus was in need of an upgrade, and ARM’s Chanceller­y building joins a group of new buildings on the site that offer a more contempora­ry approach to campus design. Key on the agenda with Monash University’s current thinking around campus architectu­re is its net-zero carbon emissions strategy, which

ARM respects in the Chanceller­y by designing to Passivhaus principles.

In true ARM style, the design approach was one of “messy vitality,” to quote from Robert Venturi. This is most clearly expressed in the way the rectangula­r building is wrapped with a decorative steel screen – a simple shading device, you might say, that conforms to Passivhaus principles by controllin­g heat gain.

But this screen is also oozing with layers of history that bring a richness and meaning to the design.

Firstly, the screen is a kind of reincarnat­ion of the screen from the former Chanceller­y building – a screen that was eventually removed, “probably because it was considered too vulgar,” suggests architectu­ral historian Conrad Hamann. Secondly, it cleverly advances the “brise-soleil” sun-breakers of mid-century design through the use of digital fabricatio­n. Rather than the simple repetitive elements typical of mid-century brise-soleils, the geometric pattern of this screen changes and fluctuates across the surface, resulting in a moiré effect that is a bit like a 1960s Bridget Riley painting. Thirdly, the craft of the screen reinforces the roots of the university as a demonstrat­ion of “applied research” and the skill of contempora­ry Australian manufactur­ing design – in this case, Fabmetal Specialist­s. Fourthly, it draws on a lineage of mid-century corporate headquarte­rs and is a direct reference to Edward Durell Stone’s Embassy of the United States of America in New Delhi (c. 1959), though it also reminds me of the wonderful brise-soleils designed by local émigré architects Holgar and Holgar.

Serendipit­ously, the etymology of the word “chanceller­y,” which stems from the Latin cancellus, reflects both the screen and the function of the building. While the cancellari­us were like the adjudicato­rs of Rome, so too the occupants of the Chanceller­y building are the key decisionma­kers of the university. And, to extend the connection further, the word cancelli describes the screen that separated the judge and counsel from the audience in a Roman court of law.

When ARM principal and design architect for the project Jeremy Stewart took me around the new facilities, I was struck by the public nature of the building – a “quiet icon,” as Stewart describes it. Chanceller­y buildings are typically fortress-like, but this building actively connects to its surrounds and reinvigora­tes the spine of the site in a more contempora­ry approach to campus design. While the former building was separated from the public via a moat, the new Chanceller­y offers a generous cloister with a colonnaded edge around two of its faces. This L-shaped cloister provides a welcoming space for students and visitors, augmented by the outdoor seating and landscape designed by Openwork that echoes the mid-century flavour. The colonnade

also performs as a procession space; after

“gowning up” in the Chanceller­y building, the senior management team and academics ceremoniou­sly parade through to Robert Blackwood Hall (Roy Grounds, 1971), where the graduation­s take place. Grottoes are carved out of the two remaining facades, which face the Religious Centre (Mockridge, Stahle and Mitchell, 1968) and Guilford Bell’s addition to the former Union building (1970), inviting people to get up close to the building. These urban connection­s are a vast improvemen­t on the original Chanceller­y.

With its seven unique artist-designed columns, the Chanceller­y’s colonnade exudes greater civic delight than a Joze Plecnik colonnade. The result of a collaborat­ion with the Monash University

Museum of Art (MUMA), the art columns were designed by local and internatio­nal artists from diverse cultural background­s to reflect the values of Monash University, and there is provision to add more in the future. These art columns – each one with its own distinct character – are tactile and colourful. Yolngu artist Gunybi Ganambarr, for example, has designed a bumpy and textured black and white column inspired by sacred larrakitj (memorial poles), while Melbourneb­ased Thai artist Vipoo Srivilasa’s golden-tiled column of spheres references Thai Buddhist temples.

It terms of the building’s massing, Passivhaus principles drove the rectangula­r form. Hence, any expressive gestural moments you might expect from an ARM Architectu­re design occur internally. As the practice explains it: “Imagine the building as a solid block, and we carved out two bunches of giant chair legs in random shapes from the block’s centre. This created two great rounded voids whose shapes we simplified somewhat. Next, we carved out the rest of the interiors, leaving only the floor plates and ceiling.”

As you walk into the ground-level atrium space, these voluptuous voids create a sense of drama in what is essentiall­y an office building with a light well. One void is entirely internal while the other has a vast north-facing ground-to-roof window. The architect describes “shadows” of these voids registerin­g as pink Kimberley sandstone insets on the ground floor. As you look up through the voids, you see an exquisite image of Australian native flowers printed onto a “spaghetti” ceiling (made from recycled wood-textured panelling) and naturally illuminate­d by clerestory windows on the upper level, “like a fresco.” This image, sourced from the National Gallery of Australia collection, is a 30-metre-by-11-metre scaled-up reproducti­on of the great Australian artist Margaret Preston’s woodcut print, Tea-Tree and Hakea Petiolaris (1936). McDougall explains this masterful move, led by ARM principal Andrea Wilson, as follows: “We were looking for something that was readable and powerful when it was enlarged and which also represente­d the possibilit­ies of Australian design and its history.”

There are moments of joy throughout the interior spaces – like the beautifull­y crafted table comprised of an assemblage of “random” chair legs bunched up together and echoing the chair-leg design theme, or the reimaginin­g of the brise-soleil as a mid-century-style room-dividing screen.

There is also a homeliness to the upper-level office spaces that steers away from a corporate aesthetic.

An integratio­n of fragments from the original building further imprints its history. These fragments include the original Feathersto­n-designed furniture, and the green schist stone and crest (which now occupy the Academic Boardroom), along with the tiles salvaged from the main chanceller­y room, which line a wall in the atrium and include some replica additions that differ slightly in tone.

But it is the recasting of the stairwell from the former Chanceller­y building that seals in the university’s history. Monash University is renowned for its radical left student activities during the

1960s and early 1970s – like its Maoist-dominated Labor Club, its epic student meetings on the lawns and its well-known student newspaper, Lot’s Wife. At one stage, the stairwell of the former Chanceller­y building was occupied by students protesting for rights to the building – an event that is now etched in as a permanent memory through the reinstatin­g of this stairwell. I like to think that this is why the new facilities have been designed to be both very private and very public – students and visitors can see in from outside, peer up to the senior management via the voids, and even enter the ground-level Alan Finkel Room or inhabit the atrium during events, yet the building remains highly secure and restricted.

— Christine Phillips is a registered architect, senior lecturer at RMIT University and director of OoPLA. She is passionate about Australian architectu­re and cultural heritage.

 ?? Photograph­y by John Gollings and Rhiannon Slatter ??
Photograph­y by John Gollings and Rhiannon Slatter
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The building is wrapped in a digitally fabricated steel screen that is at once decorative, a shading device and a link to the former chanceller­y.
The building is wrapped in a digitally fabricated steel screen that is at once decorative, a shading device and a link to the former chanceller­y.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? On the upper levels, the expected corporate aesthetic is replaced by a welcome homeliness.
On the upper levels, the expected corporate aesthetic is replaced by a welcome homeliness.
 ??  ?? Visible through the voids is a 1936 woodcut print by Margaret Preston, scaled up and reproduced on the ceiling.
Visible through the voids is a 1936 woodcut print by Margaret Preston, scaled up and reproduced on the ceiling.
 ??  ?? “Shadows” of pink Kimberley sandstone are reflected on the floor beneath the voids.
“Shadows” of pink Kimberley sandstone are reflected on the floor beneath the voids.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The interior walls of one of the lifts are imprinted with photos of a ceremonial fire. Artwork: Kaiela Arts and Spacecraft Studio.
The interior walls of one of the lifts are imprinted with photos of a ceremonial fire. Artwork: Kaiela Arts and Spacecraft Studio.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia