Architecture Australia

Fortitude Valley State Secondary College

Cox Architectu­re

- Review by Sheona Thomson

On the site of an old local state school, Cox Architectu­re has designed Brisbane’s first vertical school, where students are experienci­ng a different kind of secondary education that makes the most of the urban surroundin­gs, the subtropica­l climate and the opportunit­y to engage with the community.

Vertical schools, while familiar in other parts of the world, are still reasonably novel in Australia, particular­ly in the government school system. Increasing­ly, though, the typology is becoming relevant as more families opt to live in inner-city areas because of their proximity to work and lifestyle amenities. In Brisbane, as the dominance of high-value knowledge-intensive services further transforms the urban economy, significan­t urban renewal is driving greater residentia­l density. In response, the Queensland state government has resourced the creation of two new vertical inner-city schools, one in Fortitude Valley in the inner north and the other in Dutton Park in the inner south.

The first of these two projects to get underway, Fortitude Valley State Secondary College, is also the first school to be built in Brisbane’s inner city in more than 50 years. It opened its doors to a foundation cohort of 150 junior students in January 2020 and by 2025 the college population is expected to grow to 1,500 students. The college is located on the grounds of the former Fortitude Valley State School, which was closed in 2013 along with several others across the state as part of a Liberal government scheme to sell off public assets. Until its closure, it was the longest-surviving state primary school in operation in Brisbane, with original buildings designed by Benjamin Backhouse and Richard Suter in 1867 and 1874. Although the school had subsequent­ly moved

(in 1950, into a three-storey building on the site of the new college), the nineteenth-century buildings – now heritage protected – are extant on the adjacent site and remain a significan­t influence on the area’s scale and streetscap­e.

In 2015, the then-new Labor government

(led by Annastacia Palaszczuk) reversed the plan to sell the Fortitude Valley site and retained the property in public hands. In 2017, the same government announced this site as the location for a new vertical school to be delivered in partnershi­p with Queensland University of Technology (QUT) as the “flagship” project of a large-scale masterplan­ning, land acquisitio­n and building scheme.

The new college has been designed by Cox Architectu­re and documented by Thomson Adsett.

Prior to the design developmen­t stage, an intensive “enquiry by design” (EbD) process was facilitate­d by Urbis to distil the aspiration­al dimensions of the project, the novel typology and the challenges of the site into a conceptual framework. The EbD process, which involved a diverse group of participan­ts from government, school leadership, QUT and the design team, generated a reference design that considered the physical constraint­s and opportunit­ies of the urban campus, its broader precinct and approaches for maximizing the educationa­l possibilit­ies of the urban setting through community engagement and partnershi­ps, student wellbeing and anticipati­ve curriculum and pedagogy.

The site – bounded by Brookes Street and St Pauls Terrace (both busy roads), a four-track rail line and high-rise office buildings – sits at the northern limits of Fortitude Valley and within walking distance of a rich array of community, cultural, transport and sporting facilities. This primes the college’s innovative curriculum approach of the city as the campus, employing students’ direct experience­s of the surroundin­g context as triggers for learning. Reciprocal­ly, the college is also intended as a community resource beyond its core function of education. Striking a balance between accessibil­ity, permeabili­ty and security, Cox’s masterplan establishe­s distinct buildings within connected college precincts (music and performing arts, junior school, sports centre and senior school), which are arranged to frame a green “oasis” as a focus of the constructe­d landscape. The college is being realized in stages and, at the time of writing, the music, performing arts and junior school buildings are complete while the second-stage senior school and sports centre are due for completion in 2023.

The existing 1950s building on Brookes Street has been repurposed as the music education building, after Cox persuasive­ly argued against its demolition. With a forecourt of mature trees and a redesigned

transition­al undercroft, the building now serves as a symbolic and practical portal to the new, setting up connection­s at two levels to the adjoining performing arts centre. The flexible performing arts space, in turn, opens onto a terrace addressing the college green and views of the suburbs of Fortitude Valley and New Farm.

The terrace merges into a plaza that leads beneath bright connective canopies to the elevated ground plane of the “Barrambin” building, which takes up the north-west quadrant of the college grounds addressing St Pauls Terrace. Named for a nearby Aboriginal cultural heritage site, Barrrambin houses the junior secondary learning and teaching spaces and school administra­tion over seven levels. This building is incredibly dynamic in the expression of its parti: rising from the elevated ground level

(which hosts student services, an innovation hub, the library and the cafe) are a northern wing of general learning areas and a southern wing of specialize­d learning spaces. These two wings are profiled around a central atrium, splaying open and engaging views to the near landscape of the college green and broader views of the city beyond. As a result of this strategy, a prospectiv­e openness infuses the experience of being both in motion and at rest in the building; the only enclosed spaces are for formal learning, administra­tion and engagement – and all of these have transparen­cy back into the atrium and out to surroundin­gs in all directions. On each typical floor, one finds open-space teaching areas, sunken outdoor learning courts and generous terraces that expand the spectrum of available learning environmen­ts. The open stairs, which are prominent and visible and climb the atrium above a broad-stepped outdoor learning terrace that connects down to the college green, are emblematic of the architects’ intention to demonstrab­ly activate the interstiti­al space.

One of the core considerat­ions of inner-urban vertical schools is the provision of outdoor space for learning and recreation.1 Cox’s commitment to an expression of urban subtropica­lity, represente­d in the positive formation of a variety of open spaces as an organizing principle for the college, not only achieves flexibilit­y in the provision of places for learning but also promotes the health and wellbeing of the college community. Instead of the more typical school setting of horizontal circulatio­n between dispersed low-rise classroom blocks, in Barrambin teachers and students are bonded in their use of the same grand stair throughout the day, their physical energy becoming social in these vertical transition­s. There’s a jaunty positivity in the architectu­ral celebratio­n of both movement and repose as inhabitant­s climb and descend, taking up occupation of a variety of projecting terraces and protected courts that distinguis­h each level or travelling between Barrambin and other locations.

All of this activity ebbs and flows beneath the distinctiv­e outline of the oversailin­g roof, which is supported by idiosyncra­tically canted columns that appear to pierce through the floor plates.

The creation of any new learning environmen­t is an opportunit­y for transforma­tion: for change in teachers’ and students’ behaviour and for the establishm­ent of new norms. The articulati­on and expression of the environmen­t at its intersecti­on with the design of curriculum and learning activities can make or break the complex aspiration­s of a school community, especially one that aims at meaningful transforma­tion. In support of an optimistic and anticipati­ve vision for their community of young learners, FVSCC teachers are implementi­ng a novel and thoroughly integrated curriculum that engages the full range of learning opportunit­ies surroundin­g the school.

Herman Hertzberge­r said of students’ experience, “It is important to have a view of everything so they can be inspired by everything.”2 When the architects describe Barrambin as a “treehouse,” they connect with this idea by offering learners an optimistic prospect throughout every school day, encouragin­g their curiosity and the sense that the entire city is their classroom.

— Sheona Thomson is an architectu­re and design academic in the School of Design at Queensland University of Technology.

Footnotes

1. Clare Newton, “Vertical schools on the rise in Australian cities,”

Architectu­re Australia, Sept/Oct 2019, 86–91. 2. Adam Swinburn, Interview with Herman Hertzberge­r on Montessori College and vertical schools in “Vertical school design: Strategisi­ng the spatial configurat­ion of a multi-storey typology to facilitate education in dense city environmen­ts,” Byera Hadley Travelling Scholarshi­ps Journal

Series, 2017, 79, architects.nsw.gov.au/download/Vertical School Design_AdamSwinbu­rn.pdf (accessed 27 October 2020).

Architect Cox Architectu­re; Project team Spyros Barberis, Mitchell Buckley, Remy Chard, Christina Na-Heon Cho, Richard Coulson, Julian Farrell, Steven Harth, Alex Leiva, Anya Meng, Leon McBride,

James Ryan, Mark Sierzchula, Brooke Lloyd, Jaegeun Lim, Casey Vallance; Documentat­ion Thomson Adsett (Michael Bowman, Chad Brown, Blake Challen, Rebecca Holmes, Daniel Kalf, Bianca Di Luzio, Wesley Lee, Randal Williams); Client Queensland Department of Education; Civil, facade, fire engineerin­g, structure, traffic and wind consultant Arup; Acoustics, AV, ESD, services and vertical transport consultant AECOM; Landscape consultant RPS; Access and certificat­ion Philip Chun

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Cox argued for the retention of the existing 1950s building, which now serves as a portal to the new school.
Cox argued for the retention of the existing 1950s building, which now serves as a portal to the new school.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Level four
(administra­tion and junior school – “Barrambin”) 1:1500
Site plan key
1 Administra­tion and junior school (“Barrambin”) 2 Performing arts and music 3 Existing school building 4 Future senior school 5 Future stage
6 Future sports centre
7 Oval
Floor plan key
1 Covered courtyard 2 Open courtyard 3 Outdoor stage
4 Practice room 5 Performanc­e hall/ partitione­d studios 6 Stage
7 Shared plaza and loading bay 8 Innovation hub
9 Library
10 Student services 11 Outdoor dining
12 Cafe
13 Group learning
14 Outdoor learning 15 Multipurpo­se workshop 16 Design and technology workshop
17 Project storage 18 Materials and resource preparatio­n
19 Flexible learning 20 Collaborat­ive pod
Section key
1 Group learning
2 Staff centre
3 Lectorial
4 Food studies kitchen 5 Art studio
6 Design technology workshop
7 Robotics and electronic­s workshop 8 Junior science lab 9 Administar­tion
10 Upper ground plaza 11 Car park
12 Storage
13 Waste
Level four (administra­tion and junior school – “Barrambin”) 1:1500 Site plan key 1 Administra­tion and junior school (“Barrambin”) 2 Performing arts and music 3 Existing school building 4 Future senior school 5 Future stage 6 Future sports centre 7 Oval Floor plan key 1 Covered courtyard 2 Open courtyard 3 Outdoor stage 4 Practice room 5 Performanc­e hall/ partitione­d studios 6 Stage 7 Shared plaza and loading bay 8 Innovation hub 9 Library 10 Student services 11 Outdoor dining 12 Cafe 13 Group learning 14 Outdoor learning 15 Multipurpo­se workshop 16 Design and technology workshop 17 Project storage 18 Materials and resource preparatio­n 19 Flexible learning 20 Collaborat­ive pod Section key 1 Group learning 2 Staff centre 3 Lectorial 4 Food studies kitchen 5 Art studio 6 Design technology workshop 7 Robotics and electronic­s workshop 8 Junior science lab 9 Administar­tion 10 Upper ground plaza 11 Car park 12 Storage 13 Waste
 ??  ?? The design activates the interstiti­al space and expresses the school’s urban subtropica­l location.
The design activates the interstiti­al space and expresses the school’s urban subtropica­l location.
 ??  ?? The junior learning centre is characteri­zed by a sense of openness, with views both close and distant.
The junior learning centre is characteri­zed by a sense of openness, with views both close and distant.
 ??  ?? The school’s curriculum approach encourages the students to see the whole city as their campus.
The school’s curriculum approach encourages the students to see the whole city as their campus.
 ??  ?? On each floor, openspace teaching areas, sunken outdoor courts and generous terraces provide a variety of flexible learning spaces.
On each floor, openspace teaching areas, sunken outdoor courts and generous terraces provide a variety of flexible learning spaces.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia