Bloomberg Businessweek (Asia)

The SEIU fought for a $15 minimum wage. It’s still fighting for its future

“We can’t survive in a world where the oxygen is being cut off”

- −Josh Eidelson

By 2020 there will be a $15 minimum wage in effect for fast-food workers in New York City, for employees of large companies in Seattle, and for all workers in Los Angeles. On March 28, California Governor Jerry Brown announced a deal to make the $15 wage standard throughout the state by 2022. Last year, Democrats in Congress proposed making $15 the national starting wage, replacing the $7.25 federal minimum that prevails today.

None of that would have been possible without the union-conceived Fight for $15, a four-year-old effort that’s been organized labor’s most effective political campaign in recent memory. “On the political level, it’s definitely working,” says Vincent Vernuccio, who directs labor policy for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michiganba­sed free-market think tank. The Fight for $15 was the brainchild of the

Service Employees Internatio­nal

Union, the second-largest in the U.S., many of whose 1.9 million members work for local or state government or in taxpayer-funded health-care jobs. Since 2012, SEIU has sunk millions of dollars into the Fight for $15 to pressure fast-food corporatio­ns to allow unionizati­on, lobby elected officials to pass higher wage laws, and support worker walkouts and mass demonstrat­ions.

SEIU’s president, Mary Kay Henry, is gambling that the Fight for $15 will help save her organizati­on, which like all U.S. unions faces serious threats to its future. Henry says increasing standards for the worst-paid workers is bolstering her members’ efforts to win bigger raises. SEIU leaders also believe pressure on fast-food corporatio­ns will eventually yield a deal that covers millions of workers, improves their lives, and includes a funding mechanism for the campaign to continue— even if the result doesn’t look like a traditiona­l union. “We bargain in the way we know how,” Henry says. “We’re also taking risks in building a movement that’s going to birth the next form of worker power.”

Unions are in a weaker position today than they’ve been in decades. In February, West Virginia became the fourth state in as many years to pass a law letting workers in the private sector opt out of paying union fees, even if they’re covered by union-negotiated contracts. A 2014 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court banned mandatory union fees for Medicaidfu­nded home-health aides, SEIU’s fastest-growing membership group.

On March 29, the court issued a split 4-4 ruling in a case challengin­g

mandatory union fees for publicsect­or workers covered by union contracts. The deadlock leaves rules allowing such fees intact, but other challenges have already been filed in lower courts. That means the Supreme Court may choose to revisit the question after the seat left vacant by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is filled. Losing mandatory fees, unions say, would drive their share of the U.S. workforce below today’s 11 percent, down from about one-third 50 years ago. “We can’t survive in a world where the oxygen is being cut off,” says Larry Hanley, president of the 190,000-member Amalgamate­d

Transit Union.

Before becoming SEIU’s president in 2010, Henry was head of its healthcare division. Under her leadership, it successful­ly unionized home-health aides by getting states to treat them as public employees rather than independen­t contractor­s and cut deals with hospital chains that made it easier to add more workers to the union. As president, Henry quickly moved to persuade union leaders inside and outside SEIU that the movement was on a trajectory to oblivion unless it could find ways to bring more workers under the umbrella of organized labor. “No matter how successful SEIU will be, it cannot win in the long term unless we create a broader movement,” says Eliseo Medina, SEIU’s former secretary-treasurer. “That was the context.”

Central to Henry’s solution was tethering SEIU, long a reliable source of Democratic campaign volunteers, to a public-advocacy effort against income inequality. In 2011, SEIU created what it called the Fight for a Fair Economy, which aimed at introducin­g wages into the national conversati­on before the 2012 election. “We made a decision not to make it an SEIU thing,” avoiding branding the campaign with its signature violet logo, says Neal Bisno, who heads SEIU’s health-care-workers union in Pennsylvan­ia. “We literally took off our purple T-shirts.” In February 2012 an internal SEIU memo outlined a plan to position unions as an answer to income inequality, in part by mobilizing fast-food workers.

While SEIU has been funding and directing the Fight for $15 from the start, local groups such as New York Communitie­s for Change and Chicago-based Action Now served as the campaign’s initial public face. Until the California deal, many of its victories were at the city level. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is also pushing for a statewide $15 minimum for all workers.

Yet to critics, the Fight for $15 amounts to a feel-good distractio­n from the real problems SEIU faces. The organizati­on, which long touted itself as America’s “fastest-growing union,” reported about 34,000 fewer members at the end of 2015 than in 2011. The problem, some SEIU veterans say, is how to justify the continued outlay for minimum-wage protests on behalf of nonunion workers in light of the decline in dues-paying membership­s. Just as AARP relies on the money it makes in royalties from licensing insurance and other products, SEIU needs to find a funding stream to pay for its social-justice work, says Andy Stern, who preceded Henry as SEIU president. The union can’t just keep transferri­ng revenue it makes from bargaining contracts to pay for its social justice work, Stern says, “because collective bargaining is shrinking.”

To Henry’s allies, that’s an outmoded way of thinking about labor. SEIU Healthcare Illinois President Keith Kelleher says a potential model could be the New York–based Freelancer­s

Union, which doesn’t have collective bargaining deals with individual companies. Instead, it funds itself by taking commission­s on health insurance and other services sold to its members. “If it has the power to raise wages and it contains a model for organizati­onal resiliency and standards enforcemen­t, does it matter?” asks David Rolf, president of the largest SEIU local in Washington state. Given the challenges unions face, Henry says, “you can’t go smaller in this moment. You have to go bigger.”

The bottom line SEIU, the second-largest U.S. union, has won a $15 minimum wage in California but no union contracts for fast-food workers.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? New York,2015
New York,2015

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia