Cosmos

RISING IN THE YEAST

The science of sourdough bread is anything but run of the mill. KELLY WONG gets a starter lesson from sourdough librarian Karl De Smedt.

-

KELLY WONG kneads the ball for a doughy take on the science of sourdough.

If one thing became synonymous with the pandemic lockdowns over the last year, it was baking bread at home. As many countries went into lockdown and flour flew off supermarke­t shelves along with toilet paper, many found themselves iso-baking bread for the first time. Sourdough bread became the third most searched recipe on Google in 2020. But this sudden global collective interest in baking bread, and in particular sourdough, is no new trend: the art and science of it has been around for thousands of years.

Bread-making has survived through ancient civilisati­ons and it’s achieved global domination. Without it, we wouldn’t have crisp wood-fired pizzas, crusty French baguettes, fluffy “steamed bun” baos at yum cha, or even the iconic Australian culinary gift to the world, the democracy sausage (in bread). At the centre of it all is a bubbling fermentati­on process, unchanged over time.

Sourdough is a living thing. The simple combinatio­n of flour and water is more or less starting life from thin air. The basis of all sourdough bread is the starter, or mother, which couldn’t be more apt. It incorporat­es yeast and bacteria from the surroundin­g environmen­t to create that characteri­stic artisanal tang.

But although the ingredient­s are simple, the biology and chemistry behind sourdough bread reveals a complex ecosystem of microbes.

Starting the sourdough journey

For most of human history, sourdough was the dominant form of leavened bread. It wasn’t until about 150 years ago that commercial baker’s yeast, Saccharomy­ces cerevisiae, was adopted as the most common yeast used to bake bread (as well as to brew beer and make wine). Prior to that, for many thousands of years, bread was rudimentar­y. It mostly existed as flatbread-like forms.

The discovery of 36,000-year-old fragments of grinding stones, at the Cuddie Springs archaeolog­ical site in western New South Wales, suggests that Aboriginal people were the first bakers. In northeaste­rn Jordan, charred food remains made from grain 14,400 years ago suggest the early origins of cooked bread-like products.

However, it wasn’t until the Neolithic Age, approximat­ely 12,000 years ago, that the developmen­t of agricultur­e and grain harvesting allowed humans to find solace in the warm, nourishing embrace of carbohydra­tes. Neolithic sites with bread remains have been found throughout Europe and southwest Asia.

Evidence of bread production is written on the walls of Ancient Egyptian tombs and temples, showing the bread-baking process in detail. Ancient baking tools such as ovens, grinding stones and pottery have been found containing traces of yeast. The Ancient Egyptians are credited with the developmen­t of the first sourdoughs, which is likely to have been purely accidental; a flour-water mixture may have been left out for too long and, just by happenstan­ce, wild yeast found its way into the dough.

It’s the motherlode

This accidental process has not really changed apart from now becoming accidental­ly-on-purpose. Sourdough starters today are created by leaving a combinatio­n of flour and water to interact with its environmen­t. This rich microbial community varies in every single sourdough starter; the geography, the microclima­tes, types of grains, and even the individual baker’s hands all play a part, making every starter unique.

The importance of sourdough is so esteemed that an entire library dedicated to

preserving starters exists in Belgium. Karl De Smedt, the world’s first and only sourdough librarian, has a diploma in bakery. He joined Belgian bakery supplier Puratos back in 1994 as a test baker, then became a technical advisor and product trainer, and today is in charge of the Center for Bread Flavor.

The library was opened in 2013 by Puratos, who have long been doing research and developmen­t into bread – part of a network including the Italian universiti­es of Bari and Bolzano and the Microbe Institute. “Once in the library we have the chance to investigat­e them. They are part of scientific studies or projects to better understand how they work, what they do, how to maintain them and so much more,” says De Smedt.

De Smedt has 125 starters from around the world housed in the library’s refrigerat­or. These samples are numbered (not named, as some sourdough enthusiast­s do), and refreshed every two months with the original flour from which it was made, to replicate the conditions of the original bakery. A sample from each starter is sent to a lab to analyse and document its microorgan­isms. According to the Puratos website, more than 1,400 strains of wild yeast and lactic bacteria have been isolated and recorded so far from the project. These microorgan­isms are stored at -80°C to preserve the biodiversi­ty of the starters for the future.

In addition to the physical library, the Sourdough Library has an online database, which has 2,279 starters registered to date. Many of these have been given names and had their qualities described. “For a starter to become part of the Sourdough Library it must be made from a spontaneou­s fermentati­on and not prepared with a commercial starter culture,” explains De Smedt. “We look at its origins, the type of cereal or grain that is used, plus the history behind it.”

Some of the more unconventi­onal starters have included one from Mexico which is fed beer, eggs and lime. There’s a Japanese variety made with cooked sake rice. But the most bizarre starter, says De Smedt, is number 108 from Verona, Italy. It contains cow dung. With such a unique preservati­on project, he has applied to UNESCO for the library to be recognised as a World Heritage listing under criterion 6 (an associatio­n with living traditions) and criterion 10 (containing the most important and significan­t natural habitats for in-situ conservati­on of biological diversity).

“Although some starters look the same, they smell and taste different,” he says. “Each starter is unique; no two have the same compositio­n. They all have their unique consortium of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria that influences the flavour.”

Putting the sour into sourdough

Understand­ing sourdough is a balance of microbiolo­gy and biochemist­ry. The rising stars of sourdough, aside from yeast, are lactic acid bacteria known as Lactobacil­laceae.

Just like in brewing beer and winemaking, yeast will turn sugars that are present in the starch into carbon dioxide

and ethanol. However, the lactic acid bacteria – not present in breads made with only yeast – is responsibl­e for the distinct sour, more interestin­g, more complex flavours.

Some recipes call for adding vinegar and yoghurt to replicate the “sour” part of sourdough. “But this is not even getting close to the other effects yeasts and bacteria have on the water-flour matrix. Flavour, texture, enzymes, proteins, minerals can all be affected,” points out Kate Howell, Associate Professor of Food Chemistry and Director of Research Training at the University of Melbourne. Thus the outcome of your sourdough depends on the type of bacteria in your starter. There are two main types: homofermen­tative bacteria which thrive at 35°C and produce lactic acid, and he tero ferment at ive bacteria which thrive at 20°C, whose byproducts are a combinatio­n of lactic acid and acetic acid.

A more liquid sourdough kept at warmer temperatur­es will encourage the growth of the homofermen­tation and thus lactic acid will drive the flavour profile of the bread. The end product will taste more milky and creamy, like yoghurt. In the wetter starter, the microorgan­isms will be able to interact much more easily with the sugars and starches, so it will regularly need to be fed.

A stiffer, thicker sourdough kept at cooler temperatur­es favours more acetic acid production, so the flavour of your bread will lean towards sour and tangy, like vinegar. Not only that, the yeast and bacteria consume the sugars and starches more slowly, reducing the need for frequent feedings.

Over time, if the starter has been sitting out for a while, the organic acids will continue to increase. If it sits for too long, it might become too acidic or tangy; eventually the build-up of ethanol, which kills most microorgan­isms, can cause the collapse of the starter.

So what exactly are the perfect conditions for sourdough? It’s not a straightfo­rward answer. “It depends on the style of bread, needs of the baker and others besides,” according to Howell.

“Fermentati­on up to 70 hours is okay. Any longer means that gluten complexes start to degrade and the bread doesn’t rise.

“If the starter is refreshed with flour or water (at least every three days), and kept at room temperatur­e (~22–25°C) or

“In the library we investigat­e them to better understand how they work, what they do, how to maintain them and so much more.”

cooler, a nice dough fermentati­on can be done in about 24 hours (with some time retarding fermentati­on in the fridge to develop flavours).”

The knead to know more

The beauty of sourdough is that, once establishe­d, healthy and thriving, a starter has the potential to evolve. As long as you keep feeding it, starters can keep on living. Some have a long history in kitchens, with a tradition of up to 200 years old, passing through many environmen­ts, and many hands. But, there’s no way to date a sourdough starter.

“From a microbiolo­gical point of view, they are only as old as the last time they were refreshed with new flour and water,” explains Howell.

There are many reasons people are interested in studying sourdough starters. Compared to the baker’s yeast S. cerevisiae, the types of yeast found in sourdough, generally from the Kazachstan­ia genera, are not well described. According to Howell, by isolating the DNA from an older yeast in a dried sample of an old starter, you could compare the genome to yeast that exists nowadays. Genes are likely to have been enriched or changed over time.

De Smedt posits there could be greater biodiversi­ty in older starters, which could be linked to many factors such as fewer pesticides in use when they were created, more diverse grains, and less monocultur­e of microorgan­isms. It’s just one of the research questions he hopes to answer.

Other studies, such as one involving Howell, demonstrat­e that sourdough breads benefit from mixed microbial communitie­s. Not only can microbial diversity improve the taste and texture of the bread – it may also change the loaf’s health properties.

A slice of good health

As the world continues to grapple with food security issues, improving the nutritiona­l quality of food is an increasing area of interest, particular­ly in grains and staples.

“Bread is something magnificen­t, a human invention. You cannot pick it from a tree or grow it in a field. It’s human genius.”

The organic acids created by the bacteria reduces the ph of the dough. “This means a few things. Enzymes can be activated, leading to mobilisati­on of minerals, production of aroma and flavours, and developmen­t of the gluten matrix,” elaborates Howell.

Sourdough bread generally has a lower glycemic index compared with other types of bread.

Research led by Howell has shown that the interactio­ns of the yeasts and bacteria are likely to influence the production of enzymes which lead to the modificati­on of gliadin, a peptide component of gluten, and thus to an altered gluten content. Because of this, some people who have gastrointe­stinal sensitivit­ies are able to consume sourdough bread without the side effects.

The biochemica­l process also has the ability to unlock some dietary minerals in flour like iron. The lower ph of sourdough activates phytases during fermentati­on, which makes iron more bioactive and available for absorption by the body.

For many people, including De Smedt, the positives of sourdough surpass any other type of bread.

“It’s a nobrainer when having the choice. With sourdough bread there is only a positive message about bread!” he says. “Bread is such an important staple food in human history. Bread is something magnificen­t, a human invention. You cannot pick it from a tree or grow it in a field. It’s human genius.

“Science and technology will help us understand that it is the best way to bake bread for everybody.” www.questforso­urdough.com

KELLY WONG is Cosmos’s social media manager, and a fan of bread in all its global forms.

 ??  ?? Sourdough librarian Karl De Smedt displays some of the library’s physical collection of 125 starters. Every new arrival is analysed; so far more than 1400 strains of wild yeast and lactic bacteria have been recorded.
Sourdough librarian Karl De Smedt displays some of the library’s physical collection of 125 starters. Every new arrival is analysed; so far more than 1400 strains of wild yeast and lactic bacteria have been recorded.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Karl De Smedt (above, with yeast samples) examines one of his library’s starters, #72, from Mexico, which needs to be fed regularly with beer, eggs and lime.
Karl De Smedt (above, with yeast samples) examines one of his library’s starters, #72, from Mexico, which needs to be fed regularly with beer, eggs and lime.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia