Digital Camera World

Si gma wins for quality

The best combinatio­n of image quality and zoom range

- What’s good: What’s bad: We say:

igma’s new 18-300mm delivers a mighty 16.7x zoom range with deliver excellent sharpness and reasonably low amounts of distortion and colour fringing. It does rather better than the Tamron 16-300mm in all aspects of image quality. However, the Tamron is more refined in terms of handling, thanks to the way the focus ring doesn’t rotate during autofocus and enables fulltime manual override. The Tamron also has

S1 Sigma 18–300mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Mac ro OS HSM | C

Powerful zoom range; excellent all-round image quality; effective stabiliser.

Focus ring rotates during autofocus; mounting plate lacks a weather-seal.

It edges ahead for image quality. a weather-sealed mount that’s lacking in the Sigma, as well as giving a wider angle of view at the short end of the zoom range. Overall, it’s a close call but the Sigma edges ahead for outright image quality and price.

For outright value, Sigma wins again with the latest incarnatio­n of its 18-200mm lens. The zoom range is less powerful but all-round quality is very impressive at such a low asking price – it’s the cheapest lens in the group by quite a margin. We prefer Sigma lenses to the Canon 18-200mm and Nikon 18-300mm own-brand options. The Canon is dated and needs the same kind of refresh that the company’s 18-135mm has benefitted from, while the Nikon lacks telephoto sharpness and is fairly poor value for money.

For Micro Four Thirds, the Panasonic 14-140mm gives best all-round image quality and boasts optical image stabilisat­ion, but it’s slightly down on telephoto reach compared to the Olympus and Tamron 14-150mm lenses.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia