Dubbo Photo News

Surely no surprise at the result

- Greg Smart By his own admission, Greg Smart was born 40 years old and is in training to be a cranky old man. He spends his time avoiding commercial television and bad coffee.

IS there any non-party hack surprised by the result of the Federal Election? From the moment the Liberal Party bowed to the poll results, submitted to the blindingly obvious that Tony Abbott was on the nose, and installed Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister, the Federal Election was Malcolm Turnbull’s to lose. And didn’t he come close. Rather than gather up the middle ground, the small “l” Liberals and the swinging progressiv­e voters, he dithered, flip flopped and back tracked. He was hamstring by both his lack of decisivene­ss and the hard right of his own Party.

The traditiona­l Coalition ideologies of border protection and economic management were conspicuou­sly muted in the campaign, replaced by the inane “jobs and growth” mantra.

Turnbull never looked comfortabl­e when mounting a negative attack at Labor and opposition leader Bill Shorten. Being an attack dog was and isn’t in his nature, and his body language showed his unease in that role.

Business tax cuts offered nothing for the average PAYE voter. The continual motherhood statements about pivoting to innovation and nimbleness (again more inane vagueness) did nothing to engage the disadvanta­ged, under employed or struggling lower middle class. No wonder the public switched off mid campaign.

Then, rather than refocus his strategy on tangible and credible policies, Turnbull lectured the public on the dangers of voting for any independen­t candidate, claiming minor parties would “wreak havoc” and “chaos” on Australia in “another power-sharing fiasco” with Labor.

If there is one thing the average Australian hates it’s a lecture on how to behave, let alone vote. The backlash was therefore inevitable.

The Double Dissolutio­n gamble has backfired spectacula­rly. Rather than the broom being put through the “feral senate” and the way smoothed for the industrial relations bill to curb bullyboy Union power, Malcolm in the middle has a senate split between right-wing nut jobs, centralist independen­ts and single agenda contrarian­s.

Malcolm Turnbull managed to snatch the barest of victories from the jaws of defeat, a defeat itself lethargica­lly eased from the jaws of what would have been a landslide victory nine months ago.

Whilst the Clive Palmer prototype anti-politician imploded in a haze of bluster, the public proved they are tired of the two Party monopoly, with its lecturing scare tactics. And who could blame them. It has been near to 10 years since Kevin ‘07. Kevin Rudd came to power after the public’s fatigue with John Howard, a Labor leader who was not a traditiona­l union apparatchi­k, but someone perceived as having the right leadership characteri­stics.

The moment he was done over by negative polling and backroom scheming, Australia was set on the path of revolving door leaders, wafer thin election results and political inertia.

Contemplat­e this – what has either side of party politics achieved in that near to ten years?

I’m not referring to the minutiae of daily government, which is achieved by public servants anyway, but the visionary social capital achievemen­ts.

Gonski education funding reforms? Too partisan.

Federal Health funding restructur­e? Budget emergency - too bad if you are a leaner or aging baby boomers.

Mining tax alternativ­ely known as the Mineral Resources Rent Tax? Poorly executed and negotiated, easily defeated by vested interests.

National Broadband Network? Too extravagan­t and expensive, who wants to be the clever country anyway?

Carbon tax and renewable energy rebates? Ideologica­lly abhorrent.

Infrastruc­ture? Build more roads and lease Darwin harbour to the Chinese.

Indigenous disadvanta­ge? Too hard to fix from Canberra, lets send in the military.

Environmen­tal Protection? The Reef and the Liverpool Plains are replaceabl­e right?

National Disability Support Scheme? A rare and long overdue admission of past neglect that may or may not improve the lot of those needing its support.

No wonder the public are disillusio­ned and seeking alternativ­es.

Neither party has displayed an ability to provide stable grown-up government. Both are distracted by internal power struggles between factions. Both parties are beholden to their respective political masters, the union movement and corporate sponsors.

Instead they both default to scare campaigns, such as children overboard, Mediscare, $100 roasts, Whyalla wiped of the map. But in this modern age of social media the public respond quickly when they see straight through that nonsense. Treating voters with contempt can only lead to their own demise.

Now Turnbull has to govern a notionally majority government and deal with independen­ts he so earnestly sought to oust via the Double Dissolutio­n, whilst fighting a rearguard action within his own party against the fundamenta­list conservati­ves to his right. All the while claiming a “mandate” for what?

Ten more years of the same on the horizon?

Malcolm Turnbull has declared “it is vital that this Parliament works.”

Now that would be a surprise.

Instead they both default to scare campaigns, such as children overboard, Mediscare, $100 roasts, Whyalla wiped of the map. But in this modern age of social media the public respond quickly when they see straight through that nonsense. Treating voters with contempt can only lead to their own demise.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia