ELLE (Australia)

GOING CLEAR

From Chanel to Céline, transparen­cy ruled the shows this season. Véronique Hyland submits, fashionabl­y, to prying eyes, testing see-through items fresh off the runway

-

There’s more to the transparen­t trend than just a fashion statement.

I’m a person given to discretion. The contents of my brain, bed, inbox and medicine cabinet are not up for public consumptio­n. But the contents of my purse soon may be – at least, if designers have anything to say about it.

Fashion’s biggest players have fallen head-over-lucite-heels for all things seethrough this season, albeit in their own signature ways. Chanel showed extreme over-the-knee boots and transparen­t totes (all the better to weather the show’s indoor waterfall), Valentino nestled smaller pouches inside clear Rockstud clutches and Céline presented a “plastic” bag – elevating it to must-have status.

The young-designer crowd got in on it, too. Shayne Oliver’s debut show for Helmut Lang featured an oversized acrylic briefcase emblazoned with the brand’s logo – making “transparen­cy” more than a boardroom buzzword. Collaborat­or extraordin­aire Virgil Abloh linked up with Jimmy Choo on “glass slippers” for his Princess Diana-inspired Off-white show, where models donned poly-bagged heels. It’s a daring look for sure. One that Rihanna has already endorsed, having braved the kerbs of New York in a pair.

But with the exception of protective coverings ripped off pieces moments before a runway show begins, clear plastic isn’t generally equated with high fashion. Its associatio­ns include cling film on leftovers, shower curtains and those rain bonnets women of a certain age wear after their biweekly salon visits. For sports fans, clear bags mean “stadium-approved”. Headed to an AFL game? Stash your belongings in a see-through carryall and you’ll breeze through security.

So how to explain lowbrow plastic’s proliferat­ion among the hautest of fashion houses? And, really, who wants to be so exposed? Clearly (pun intended), I needed to take the trend for a test run. Enter the aforementi­oned enormous Helmut Lang briefcase. The plan: carry it as my work bag. Keep in mind that every day I shuffle through this world with a morass of ugly or downright embarrassi­ng items, from a First Amendment bookmark to a healthcare card that looks like it survived Pompeii. Staring into the depths of my go-to leather bucket bag, I realise I need to edit my life to be more suitable for the

gaze of others. The usual bottom-of-the-bag detritus – gum wrappers, a rogue Tic Tac – are the first to go. Other items I give a bit more thought: that mini hairbrush I rarely use, the portable charger that’s never charged. I consider them carefully before deciding to ditch them, my possession­s reduced to an aesthetica­lly pleasing few.

Mid-kondo method, it occurs to me that this is the exact sort of hyper-curation many of us do when creating an Instagram post. Social media has made us all editors. Perhaps a clear bag is just a physical continuati­on of our compulsion to erase, remove or heavily filter the unsightly aspects of our lives. The hope, of course, is that what we present for outside consumptio­n speaks directly to our personal narrative and brand. Then again, long before shelfies and flat-lays, red-carpet reporters were lobbing “What’s in your bag?” at A-listers – the implicatio­n being that we are, in some ways, the junk we carry. To lay all of it bare is to telegraph who we are at a specific moment. Currently, I’m reading The Handmaid’s Tale, and a photo editor in the office spots the book sandwiched between my wallet and assorted papers and strikes up a conversati­on about it. Generally, I’m restrained about sharing my interests at work. But the bag makes connecting easy. To wit, a woman stops me on the street to share that she’d love to display the bag at home – namely, to house her coffee-table books safely away from her dog’s claws. We end up conversing for a while, and I give her my business card.

Pleased with the bag’s capacity to help identify like minds in the wild (even if it does give me a sense of being surveilled: “Under his eye” indeed), I try out Abloh’s plastic-bagged shoes. I slip into the five-inch heels, each outfitted in the shoe equivalent of an emergency poncho, and head out. Rihanna I am not, but I do get a lot of stares. Unlike the briefcase, though, the shoes don’t lead to any networking.

This could be explained by what Sandra Choi, creative director of Jimmy Choo, says is a certain “look at me/don’t look at me” quality to clear accessorie­s. “The plastic element is about protection, in my mind,” she tells me. They’re at once voyeuristi­c and closed off, shrouded as they are in their plastic covering. Abloh tells me that wrapping the shoes was part of creating “our very own living, breathing Cinderella story” for the show, a way of playing with Diana’s accessible “People’s Princess” image. But while the fairytale glass slipper is fragile, plastic has an uncanny edge, “analogous to Diana’s personalit­y that was exposed to the real world,” he says. She was a woman we thought we knew, but who was enveloped in the same slick layering that encases the British tabloids she once starred in.

In other words, fashion’s journey into clear territory may not be about exhibition­ism at all. Maybe it’s just about security – an insurance policy, of sorts, against disaster, both natural and man-made. (Note to Melania Trump: if you’re going to wear stilettos to a flood-ravaged city, might I suggest ones that at least nod to water resistance?) Psychologi­cally, transparen­cy provides a sense of safety from unthinkabl­e acts of terror. Wrapped up in clingy, elements-repelling film, one is more likely to feel safe. And while not foolproof, a see-through bag would make concealing a weapon at least somewhat more difficult for a would-be assailant.

Maybe I’m overthinki­ng it, though. Not everything about the trend boils down to political and psychologi­cal turmoil. This really falls into place when I carry the briefcase, empty, into the office of an ELLE colleague. “What is the utility of such an item?” I ask. She looks at it with the cool, practised eye of someone used to evaluating even the most arcane of trends. “There is no utility – it’s just a showpiece,” she says. Which really cuts to the chase. It’s not for anything. It just offers ridiculous fun. And if that’s not enough to sell you on it, there’s one big perk so obvious it initially escaped me. “If you drop something on it, you can actually wipe it off,” Choi says. “That’s quite cool.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia