IN THE STUDIO WITH: Claude VonStroke

The Dirtybird boss is one of the most in-demand artists in the US. We grab him in a rare moment of studio downtime to find out how he creates his distinctive take on classic house

Claude VonStroke, real name Barclay Crenshaw, has an entourage. And they all are grasping for his attention. Before our interview, shirt designs need to be approved and details still need to be finalised for one of the venues for an upcoming DirtyBird barbeque. “It might not be the best time for this,” Crenshaw mentions to his wife Aundy, who helps run both the DirtyBird label and many of the ventures that have poured forth. DirtyBird started in 2005 and quickly made a name for itself upon the release of the Claude VonStroke single Deep Throat, which sold upwards of 100,000 copies and catapulted the DJ to stages worldwide. Crenshaw now maintains an international touring schedule that, along with his label responsibilities, keeps him from making music as often as he’d like.

But all of that fades to the background when we enter his private studio, a small, custom-built room that is a hardware haven with everything perfectly in reach. Though Crenshaw’s production started in 2003 as a purely in-the-box venture, he now employs a plethora of versatile sound-sculpting instruments, including names from Dave Smith, Arturia, Moog, Native Instruments, and more. It’s here that Crenshaw’s attention to detail and ability to inject his tracks with a playful spirit shines; where he clearly settles into his truest self. This past April saw the release of Walay (My

Bae), a new Claude VonStroke EP that paired larger-than-life drums with the kind of warped vocal chops that he’s now known for. Future Music sat down to chat about which synths have managed to keep his interest over the long run, his analoguedigital hybrid production process, and how the Maschine MK3 has changed his way of working.

You just had a two-track EP come out in April. Can you tell us about what you are currently working on?

“I just finished that EP, and I just finished a remix for Booka Shade. I also have another remix coming out for MØ, and now I’m just starting another Claude VonStroke EP. We’re also going to record my set live at Movement, and we’re going to license everything I play and release it as both a compilation and mix in June. And we’re doing two festivals again, DirtyBird campout, and we have our barbeque series, so we’re super busy!”

How did your collaboration with EPROM come about? We don’t often see you in collab mode…

“I worked with EPROM before under my other alias, Barclay Crenshaw, where we made bass music. I think he’s an amazing producer and it started out as a remix of one of his tracks, but it became such a different thing that we made it a record. That whole air alarm riff came from the (Arturia) MatrixBrute using the sequencer, and then pitching it down in Ableton afterwards.”

Your tracks seem to always include some kind of vocals, whether it’s a short word or phrase or something longer that’s been processed. How does including a vocal change your production process? Do you think about it in advance?

“I always have a vocal. I always really like the kind of things James Brown and Michael Jackson did, where they would throw in little vocal stabs and it would always make the beat funkier, something like ‘huh’ or ‘ah’ – vocal as percussion. I’d say 99% of my songs, in the rhythm of the beat, there’s always a little vocal stab and I think that makes the tracks inherently funkier. Something about hearing a voice inside of a beat that gives it another dimension.”

Are those typically your voice?

“Yeah, it’s always my voice, without a doubt.”

Let’s talk about some of this gear… Your studio seems very ergonomically laid out. What are some of the most used synths in your studio these days?

“I would say the synth I end up using the most is the [DSI] Prophet 6. It kinda has a creepy thing going on with it that I like a lot. In the past I’ve used a lot of Moog Sub 37 and Voyager, but I find myself using the Prophet as a really reliable way to get a weird sound. I used the MatrixBrute on the last EP quite a bit but really everything’s getting used. I’m not a pack rat, so if it’s in my studio for eight months and I haven’t touched it, I get rid of it and I get something else. I’ve had the Prophet for a couple of years now, since about six months after it came out. It’s a good Swiss army knife. You could probably just have that and be fine but I like the toys!”

What about monitors – which are your main pair these days?

“For the last three or four months, I’ve been using these Kii Threes, which are a digitally controlled monitor and they fire the sound from seven ports. Theoretically they are supposed to remove a lot of the issues that the room shape would cause. They are really good; they sound awesome, but for the last ten years I’ve used Event Opals, which are also really good. The Opals have a missing bass extension that I’m getting with the Kiis – they’re able to go down to 20Hz or something. I don’t know how they’re doing it in this cabinet because it’s fairly small. I don’t need a sub at all and I’ve actually never used a sub because I couldn’t get the relationship right at all in the room and I think it can be deceiving. You think there is all this bass and then there’s no bass in the club at all.

“But to be honest, I still take it out to the car and it’s the only reason I won’t sell this car! I just can’t get rid of it because of the sound system. It’s an old, used Range Rover Sport, but it has the premium sound system and you can tell exactly how it’s going to sound on the overblown club systems I’m used to. It’s not ‘accurate’, but it works.”

You mentioned that you don’t hold onto gear long that you don’t use. Have you ever sold something and rebought it later?

“I don’t think so, but I’ve almost sold my Voyager five different times, but I just can’t do it. Not sure why. I look at it and just can’t sell it. That’s the synth I’ve had in my arsenal the longest – the longest surviving synth! [ laughs]”

Have you ever regretted selling anything once it’s gone?

“No, because I think there’s a lot of amazing technology and it just keeps getting more interesting. I’m not a heavy programmer. I’m more of an experimenter; I hate menus. So, for example, I know everyone loves the Elektron stuff but it’s not for me. Anything that has five menus to get to something, I just can’t do it. You might as well use your computer. But I do like some tracks that people make with them!

“At the beginning even when I started using Maschine, I hated it, but I stuck it out and now I love it. It’s still infuriates me here and there but I think it’s awesome. I wish that I would just learn everything that I have as deeply as possible but my attention span isn’t long enough to just keep things sitting around forever.”

Let’s talk about Maschine a bit. Are you still using it to generate ideas and finishing them off in Ableton?

“Yeah, I think it’s the fastest idea machine for me personally. I have a routine where I wake up, before I do my emails, I try to write a beat or two beats within one hour, whenever it is, and then just put them away. And then every three or four weeks I go into that folder and I’ll listen to everything and see which ones speak to me. I’ll pick four tracks, and then those four tracks will be whittled down to one, and then that’ll be the one I work on.

“When I made this last Barclay Crenshaw album, I did it a different way because I think that volume is actually good for you. I was working on 17 tracks at once instead of one. Because when you work on that many tracks at once, it almost becomes like DJing. Instead of saying, ‘I’m totally stuck on this, let’s abandon it’, it becomes, ‘I’m totally stuck on this, but I can pull in this bassline from that track from a few days ago’, so you can grab parts and move things around and it becomes a lot easier.”

How was the process different for the Barclay Crenshaw record?

“It was a lot different because I went about it in an entirely new way that I had never done before. I went into the studio for a week – Red Bull Studios here in LA – and recorded all live musicians. I played them all songs I liked and tried to make my own sample library of vibes and Rhodes and drum kits, in styles that I can think of but not play myself naturally. Then I would chop all those up so it’s electronic but the pieces are originating in played music. We actually did it again in New York recently for another studio record that I’ll be starting in July.”

Tell us about how you route those pedals. You’re not using a normal patchbay, right?

“I’ve had battles with people over this because I hate patchbays [ laughs]. I kept trying to convince someone to help me make a system where I could have a huge pedalboard but every single pedal is on an insert. So now we finally finished this system where I can go through all my pedals but I can just drop them in as external hardware in Ableton. I even run Maschine like a hardware drum machine, not a software drum machine; I run the audio out from it. It’s the same thing as the TR-8S next to it. Everything is audio out and then I can go through any of these pedals but I don’t have to wire it up, it’s just set up. Or I can go through the UAD effects, so you can theoretically go through the UAD plugins and then through the Moogerfoogers and whatever chain you want.”

Were you working on tracks while this system was being set up?

“I was, but they were more in the box than I wanted. I’m very fast in the box, but I’ve realised I can’t get that same level of grit in the box. You can get it if you want to go through six passes of flattening audio but even then I don’t think you can really

“I’m not a heavy programmer. I’m more of an experimenter; I hate menus”