Sequencing and chance
>
Traditionally step sequencers have been the go-to for pattern generation but there are more and more opportunities to play with rhythm in different ways. Chance-based patterns can be really fun, so take a look at modules like Mutable Instruments Marbles. This has just three outputs for triggers (and three for pitch) but they can go a long way. There are controls for speed, from regular clock to variable speeds, Brancheslike coin tosses which generate the triggers for the left and right output. Many other options are there to help you create really musical patterns. It’s a great way to work and suits many generative musicians very well.
In recent years there has been an ever-increasing interest in euclidean pattern generation with a few modules being very well suited to this. Pam’s New Workout has this method built in and it’s a lovely implementation but for easy visual feedback we’re using Euclidean Circles from vpme (along with their six switches, muting toggles). The idea here is that you set a number of steps for the pattern, highlighted by the first colour, then the number of steps in the pattern which are triggered, even spaced throughout the pattern. This remains clocked but feels more organic, and you can rotate the point at which the pattern starts, a real boon, when using multiple euclidean channels.
At the end of the day, there is no single right answer to the question of which method is best. It’s all down to what serves your taste and the music that you hope to be creating.