Geelong Advertiser

Natural meds proof fear

Labelling plan sparks backlash

- JACK HOUGHTON CHAD VAN ESTROP

THE Therapeuti­c Goods Administra­tion has been slammed for a radical proposal that will make it easier for traditiona­l and alternativ­e medicines to make health claims without any scientific proof.

The TGA is pushing for new labelling requiremen­ts for traditiona­l medicines that would allow products to claim they can treat heart and liver conditions by balancing a person’s Yin and Yang or trigger rapid weight loss with herbs.

But the move has been slammed by industry experts including Monash University researcher Dr Ken Harvey who said the average consumer would mistakenly believe products had been approved by the TGA on scientific merits.

“My concern is that the TGA is encouragin­g the industry to evade the need to prove their products work,” Dr Harvey said.

“For consumers to make an informed choice about these medicines the TGA should require products to show a disclaimer that there is no good scientific evidence that the product works.

“It is also concerning that the TGA allowed these companies to have significan­t input into creating the list.”

The reforms are included in the Therapeuti­c Goods Amendment Bill, which is being debated in the Senate.

Several consumer advocacy groups including Choice and the Consumers Health Forum of Australia have warned the reforms would allow unscrupulo­us companies to “embellish” medical claims.

In formal submission­s to the Senate they called for clear disclaimer­s to be mandatory on all complement­ary medical products.

“Our concern is that the limitation­s of this list of per- NEWTOWN naturopath Rob Claridge has backed a plan by the Therapeuti­c Goods Administra­tion to allow natural medicine to carry labels spruiking its benefits.

But Mr Claridge, pictured, warned the medication still needed to be prescribed by a properly qualified profession­al.

He said self-prescripti­on of natural medicines meant mitted indication­s may not be understood by many consumers and it may give them some misplaced confidence in the evidence behind the list,” The Consumers Health Forum of Australia told the Senate inquiry.

“There should be a disclaimer on all listed complement­ary medicines making it companies could push the envelope when it came to product marketing.

“If people are self-prescribin­g there should be disclaimer­s everywhere. When it comes to true scientific testing for natural medicine there isn’t as much investment (in testing when compared to pharmaceut­icals),” Mr Claridge said.

“You slowly but surely see natural medicine being justified but it’s being done at a slower rate (than pharmaceut­icals) clear that the efficacy claims had not been independen­tly verified, then this would not be such a problem.”

A TGA spokeswoma­n said “traditiona­l” medicines would be required to include an “advisory statement” for consumers to consult a “traditiona­l medicine practition­er”.

“Complement­ary medicines because of the financial drivers not being there.

“In traditiona­l medicine, whether it be Chinese or Ayurvedic medicine, there are processes which have stood the test of time and worked for thousands of years, and now we are having to justify those but they are already proven day to day.

“We’ve got things which are proven empiricall­y. We know they are safe because for thousands of years we’ve not can encompass a wide range of products, with varying degrees and sources of evidence on their efficacy, and a history of use related to cultural and traditiona­l values as well as on the basis of consumer health preference­s,” a TGA spokeswoma­n said.

“The reforms introduce a new mandatory requiremen­t been watching people going down with sickness because of their use. History has shown that (natural medicine) is fundamenta­lly safe.”

Mr Claridge said treatment using natural medicine focused on the causes of an illness rather than a patient’s symptoms.

“If 10 patients came to see me with asthma they would all get different treatment because what got them to their asthma is probably different.” for listed medicines to identify the evidence base both on their label and on the Register of Therapeuti­c Goods, eg ‘traditiona­lly used in western herbal medicine’or ‘traditiona­lly used in Chinese medicine’.”

Health Minister Greg Hunt defended the bill saying the labels would provide consumers with more informatio­n. “These reforms provide consumers with more informatio­n, including for traditiona­l medicine product,” he said.

The Senate was also told the TGA allowed companies to help finalise 879 traditiona­l medical claims which would be given advertisin­g approval without an applicatio­n.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia