Geelong Advertiser

TOP HOOP BANNED

Barwon Heads jockey Steven Pateman and his wife cop three years for cobalt

- RUSSELL GOULD and MICHAEL MANLEY

CHAMPION jumps jockey Steven Pateman claimed he was drunk and “just wanted to get off the phone” when he admitted to Racing Victoria stewards that he administer­ed cobalt to a horse he was training.

Pateman, Australia’s leading jumps jockey and his wife and training partner, Jess Barton, were banned for three years yesterday by the Racing and Appeals Disciplina­ry Board for presenting Sir Walter Scott at Coleraine to race on September 24, 2017, with illegal levels of cobalt.

In a damning judgment, the RAD board declared the jockey and Barton, who have a property at Barwon Heads, were “unreliable witnesses and not witnesses of truth”.

Among its reasons for the guilty finding and three-year ban, the board dismissed a claim from Pateman and Barton, who entered not guilty pleas, that their actions were a result of “impaired mental function”.

A submission to that effect from a forensic psychologi­st Tim Watson-Munro, who had not treated Pateman or Barton, was dismissed out of hand, having only become part of their defence after they were found guilty on March 16.

Neither Pateman nor Barton had mentioned any impairment of mental function in four different interviews with stewards or during two hearings over the course of two years.

The findings also revealed that after admitting to stewards in a phone interview that he had administer­ed cobalt, Pateman tried to take that admission back 11 days later when interviewe­d again.

The jockey claimed the admission was “the result of drunkennes­s, hangover, tiredness, an almost overwhelmi­ng desire to get off the telephone and the like”.

But Pateman never denied the original admissions were made.

Pateman also tried to dispute the swabbing regime on his horse, despite “signing a document to the effect that he was satisfied with it”.

The findings were also highly critical of the stable’s record keeping, declaring it “incomplete, inaccurate and, at least in part, reconstruc­ted”.

Both Pateman and Barton could have avoided the minimum three year ban if they had pleaded guilty, having already “admitted guilt and described the circumstan­ces”.

In that case the “special circumstan­ces” defence would have been establishe­d and there would have been “no automatic or prescribed penalty”.

The stewards didn’t seek any more than the minimum period of disqualifi­cation for both. The disqualifi­cation period, which means Pateman can’t ride or train, begins immediatel­y.

 ??  ?? Jess Barton and Steve Pateman.
Jess Barton and Steve Pateman.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia