CRITIC WIDE OF MARK IN TERMINAL ASSESSMENT

GEOFF Wilson’s letter, “Sound reasons to oppose terminal” (GA, 13/5), contains a number of errors.

The Geelong refinery site is an ideal location for a floating gas import terminal, given its existing industrial setting, current use for regular shipping activities, an experienced workforce and proximity to the gas network.

For decades, Corio Bay has been a busy port and industrial area that has been subject to dredging activity.

Enthusiastic fishers continue to catch plenty of fish in this healthy marine environment and recreational bay users can be reassured that independent experts have found the proposed terminal will have little impact on marine ecology.

Thorough scientific modelling shows dredging impacts on the marine environment are shortlived and localised, and that the slower currents in Corio Bay mean sediments don’t move as far and settle locally.

In reference to safety, Mr Wilson’s Google search will take people to stories about LNG production sites – not floating import terminals like the one we are proposing. Floating gas terminals have operated for decades near populated areas without a serious accident affecting the public.

All of these matters are addressed in detail in the comprehensive environment effects statement, available to the public on the Viva Energy and Victorian government websites.

Viva Energy is committed to the safety of our community and protecting the environment and we will not proceed, nor will we be given licence to proceed, unless the project can be undertaken safely and without adverse impact on the bay.

Michael Cave, Viva Energy media manager