Golf Australia

HUGGAN’S ALLEY: JOHH HUGGAN

- 14 | BY JOHN HUGGAN | GOLF AUSTRALIA C OLUMNIST AT L ARGE

LOOK, I get it. At the elite level, golf is a lucrative business. Players are out there competing for millions of whatever currency you care to mention. So they should be careful; they should take a little time to consider; they should have their little routines before every shot. We all understand that aspect of the profession­al game.

But news that, as part of recently announced proposals regarding possible changes to the Rules of Golf, the PGA Tour is going to begin testing distance-measuring devices (DMDs) on the Web.com Tour, Mackenzie Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamér­ica later this year is nothing more than surrender in the war against slow play. Unbelievab­ly, the new commission­er, Jay Monahan, seems to think that giving players and caddies one more job to do before they even begin to ponder what club might be most suitable for this next shot is going to accelerate things out on the links. It’s not. In fact, it’s going to have the opposite effect, as any sane person can surely deduce without too much in the way of rational thought. As my friend and fellow Golf Australia contributo­r Mike Clayton asks: “How can these things speed up play if you have to wait for the flag to be in before you start?” An excellent point. And Michael is not alone in his contempt for this nonsensica­l premise. Scotsman Craig Connelly – aka “wee man” – caddies for former US Open and USPGA champion Martin Kaymer. “Just about every caddie and player (me included) would doublechec­k with the yardage book after ‘shooting’ the pin,” he admits. “It would be one more thing to do.” Rickie Fowler is another shaking his head at this ludicrous suggestion. “We’ll all go through our normal routines then ‘shoot’ the pin to make sure it is in the spot we think it is on the green,” says the former Players champion. And this is going to make golf faster? As my dear old grandfathe­r used to say, “aye right.” Quite apart from the implicatio­ns for pace of play, these DMD things are – at least for the leading profession­als – almost devoid of point. As Justin Rose was quick to acknowledg­e, he and his peers do not play “one number” golf. In other words, knowing how far it is from their ball to the hole is only one small part of the increasing­ly complicate­d process they simply must go through before beginning their increasing­ly complicate­d pre-shot routines. They must – simply must – ascertain how far the pin is from the back edge, left edge, right edge and front edge of the distant green. Oh, almost forgot. The distance to that pesky bunker is a must-know too.

All of which is nothing more than yet another indication that golf is losing its way in these increasing­ly high-tech times. At its best, the game Scotland gave to the world is an art – not a science. Ask yourself this: would you rather watch the likes of Seve Ballestero­s and Lee Trevino displaying their creative geniuses, or an endless stream of robotic “scientists” working their way through the aforementi­oned yardage-checks and pre-shot routines? The answer is obvious. And equally obvious to anyone and everyone, the proposed DMD tests (players and caddies will be allowed to use rangefinde­rs during four consecutiv­e pre-determined tournament­s) should simply be abandoned. They won’t be of course. In what is sure to be little more than a formality (or farce), the PGA Tour and player advisory council will discuss any findings and reassess the situation. Andy Pazder, the chief tournament­s and competitio­ns officer for the PGA Tour, said the evaluation “will consider the impact on pace of play, optics and any other effects they might have on the competitio­n.” Give me strength. There is, of course, only one solution, especially at club level. Let’s get right back to basics. Ban yardages altogether. Take away those silly 150-yard markers. Make scorecards smaller by eliminatin­g the lengths of each hole – what good is that informatio­n? Does it really make any difference? And get rid of those fancy yardage books with the nice graphics and lots of numbers we rarely use anyway. Spend the money on something more practical like sunscreen. My reasoning is simple. Very few of us have any idea how far we are going to hit our next shot. So do we really need to know that it is 201 yards to the pin? No, we don’t. Ben Hogan never used yardages and he seemed to manage pretty well. We would too and – it says here – we would also have more fun. Gauging distance and, in turn, pulling the correct club should again be an integral part of this supposedly artistic sport. I rest my case.

THERE IS, OF COURSE, ONLY ONE SOLUTION, ESPECIALLY AT CLUB LEVEL. LET’S GET RIGHT BACK TO BASICS. BAN YARDAGES ALTOGETHER. TAKE AWAY THOSE SILLY 150-YARD MARKERS.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia