Guitar Techniques

INSTRUMENT­AL inquisitio­n!

Instrument­als have supplied some of music’s most evocative moments. We asked some top guitarists for their take on this iconic movement. This month: one-time Joe Satriani student, ex T-Ride guitarist and now solo artist,

- Geoff Tyson.

GT: What is so appealing to you about instrument­als?

Geoff: I was always fascinated with the raw power and energy of an electric guitar, pumped up loud through a tube amp, in that it’s so primal and emotional. It’s a perfect instrument to be featured as a melodic and rhythmic centre of a well composed and produced song. But to be honest, I don’t especially care for most guitar instrument­al music. There are some amazing players in the world today, but the flashy, technique-first style of many of them I find tedious, like watching someone do the same card trick again and again. I prefer a great player, combined with compositio­n-first types of albums like Jeff Beck, Satriani, Steve Morse, Django Reinhardt, or the old albums from Bill Bruford featuring Allan Holdsworth. Give me a great song first, and then let the guitar shine on top of it.

GT: What can an instrument­al provide that a vocal song can’t?

Geoff: Just try to sweep-pick with your voice! Ha-ha. Different styles and different instrument­s can achieve vast, emotionall­y expressive music. But like ballet and kickboxing, both have a specific purpose and probably don’t need to be compared. With guitar it’s not just about the notes being played, but it’s also the infinite tones, the rhythmic and dynamic capabiliti­es, and the fact that not everyone can do it. Like watching a master at kung fu, the master guitarist can be awe-inspiring just because it’s hard to do it well.

GT: Any tendencies that you aim to embrace or avoid?

Geoff: I don’t really think about it. I find that the process of writing songs, whether it’s instrument­al or vocal, is more a stream-ofconsciou­sness kind of thing. I like to stay in the moment. It always starts with an improvisat­ion, and then I build on it without any firm

direction, letting the song guide me around like it’s coaxing me to reveal it. I don’t usually even remember how I did things when I listen back the next morning and I’m often surprised that I don’t suck. With this attitude, I feel like a song could come from anywhere. Give me a broken ukulele and a bottle of cough syrup and there will be a song in there somehow.

GT: Is a standard song structure always relevant for instrument­als?

Geoff: With instrument­al music, anything goes. It’s typically not restrained by pop arrangemen­t mentalitie­s because it doesn’t matter if it is ‘radio friendly’. If a song can keep your attention, and make you want to listen again and again, who cares that it’s 17 minutes of the same two chords? So making instrument­al music can be very liberating. I never found myself editing down an instrument­al song time so that it would be ‘normal’, and never changed a song because I thought it might not be ‘what people want to hear’, like I often do when making vocal music. There is no shortage of great pop music to listen to if that’s your inclinatio­n, so why go in that direction?

GT: How useful is studying a vocalist’s approach for melodies?

Geoff: I have been writing vocal music for most of my career so when I started this instrument­al album, I initially approached it in the same way. I wrote 14 songs, tracked drums, then went to record my guitar melody parts. It was horrible. I had to throw away all 14 songs and start again. The vocal centered technique didn’t work at all and I had to write the whole album from a completely different mentality. So, although I think it’s great to study the works of great singers, I prefer to leave those lessons as subliminal.

GT: How do you start writing one; is there a typical approach?

Geoff: I don’t know! It’s a mystery to me. I always record and keep everything. So, my typical starting point is, guitar in tune, amp sounding good, levels set properly into ProTools, then I just hit record and go. I just jam until I have something that strikes me, and then I continue until it is a coherent idea. Then I add some production adornments, bass, keys, and whatever, until I can imagine what the final song might be. If it’s good, then I will shift gears and approach it like a producer and make it sound juicy. With this system I know within one hour whether it’s worth pursuing, and I don’t have any emotional connection if I need to dump it. I’d say 60% of the songs on this album have first take, original improv parts left in the final mix.

GT: What do you aim for when your performanc­e is centre stage for the entire instrument­al?

Geoff: The performanc­e has to complement the other instrument­s and production, never letting the listener get distracted by anything external. Let’s take them on a little adventure, and make sure there are plenty of memorable moments along the way. I use a variety of tones, chord changes, dynamic changes, even silence when needed. Contrast is a powerful tool.

GT: Many vocal songs feature a guitar solo that starts low and slow then finishes high and fast. Is this useful for developing pace and dynamics within a piece?

Geoff: I guess anything could work if it’s good. I find that starting from a system or preconcept­ion can really limit the way forward. The more I want it to be something, the more it sounds contrived and forced and boring. I find it’s best to just let go and trust my unconsciou­s skills rather than my terrible organisati­onal abilities. It’s funny for me to find that my best skills frequently are out of my conscious control. I love electronic vibes from bands like Massive Attack or DeadMau5 because they explore dynamic changes in ways that aren’t necessaril­y typical, but they take the listener on a journey and you’re happy to be on that ride with them. I rarely feel that their music is formulaic or contrived.

GT: What type of guitar tone do you prefer for instrument­als?

Geoff: Starting with the tone determines the part I will choose to play and nature of the compositio­n. If it’s an aggressive tone, the song generally goes in that aggressive direction. A sweeter tone will inspire a different style of playing which then dictates the nature of the instrument­s around it. I don’t try to force any tone or feeling in where it doesn’t belong. It’s important for me to be free to make mistakes. I’ll follow an idea to its emotional conclusion and in the end, if I don’t like it, I don’t mind dumping it. But I never start a song with the idea that it will be a masterpiec­e, regardless of how cool the guitar tone is.

GT: Any favourite keys or tempos?

Geoff: This depends on context. For a live jam, faster tempos and Minor keys are fun, easy, and energetic. But if I’m strumming acoustic guitar, nobody wants to hear my arpeggio skills. Gotta play some groovy vibes, connect with that instrument, and be in the moment.

I NEVER FOUND MYSELF EDITING DOWN AN INSTRUMENT­AL SONG TIME SO THAT IT WOULD BE ‘NORMAL’

GT: Do you find Minor or Major keys easier to write in?

Geoff: I don’t usually know what key my songs are in until after they are mostly done. I just don’t think about it. The feeling determines the key and chord changes. Once the basic idea of the song is done, I’ll analyse it, so I know what chords to play on the synthesise­r, or maybe to tell the band. Otherwise, I don’t really care.

GT: Any favourite modes?

Geoff: I like anything that twists your expectatio­ns a bit. Lately I’ve been digging on Melodic Minor

vibes, Lydian Dominant, or anything Eastern. But it depends on context. When I was a kid and Satriani first showed me Harmonic Minor, aside from the typical applicatio­ns we would try to jam stereotypi­cal blues licks in that key, to see how mixing unrelated scales and styles might inspire or horrify. I love that approach and apply it to my songwritin­g, and production style as well. What should I play over this heavy metal riff? My first inclinatio­n is to do something obtuse. Let’s see how some Jimmy Nolen styles in Phrygian Dominant can shake things up!

GT: What about modulation­s into new keys?

Geoff: Always! I love how unexpected chord changes keep the vibe fresh and the listener attentive. Try a change like C Minor to B Lydian and see what melodies it evokes. And then check out Oren Lavie, Did You Really Say No. Another example of a beautiful melody floating effortless­ly over some gorgeous chord changes.

GT: Do you view the backing band in a different way than you would on a vocal song?

Geoff: With instrument­al music, I encourage the band to over-play, get a bit crazy in moments when it wouldn’t normally be appropriat­e, and to push the song into strange directions. This forces the other players to follow each other, be in the moment, and create something that couldn’t be pre-planned. That’s why I always want to play with musicians that are brilliant and a bit crazy. And then I leave the mistakes and produce around them in a way that implies they were intentiona­l.

GT: What are your views on harmonisin­g melodies?

Geoff: Some players can get away with it and others not. Brian May and his layered guitar harmonies are beautiful and iconic. But when Iron Maiden did it, it never had that same feeling for me. That’s one thing where I think vocal music has a distinct advantage.

GT: What three guitar instrument­als have inspired you?

Geoff: Only three? Ha-ha!

Bill Bruford, Fainting In Coils.

This is such an incredible, weird, and beautiful compositio­n, with odd time signatures, great melodies and dynamics, and it features the most tasteful solos from Allan Holdsworth, Jeff Berlin, and Dave Stewart. It takes you on an emotional journey, similar to how Pink Floyd does it, and it features such astounding musiciansh­ip without assaulting your senses.

Pat Metheny, Story From A Stranger. This is the most gorgeous solo I have ever heard. It’s performed on a guitar synthesise­r, with a mellow, muted analog sound that improvises around a chord progressio­n that leaves you breathless with every repetition. His presentati­on is so effortless, so intense, and so beautiful, that it feels like falling in love again every time I hear it.

Jeff Beck, everything he has ever done. Ha-ha. I guess I should narrow it down. All the classic tunes that we know like Cause We’ve Ended As Lovers and People Get Ready are so beautiful and melodic, that it’s almost easy to forget what a mastery he commands of his instrument. He makes it so natural and effortless. I also love his more modern releases. The song Earthquake has an almost Trent Reznor kind of feeling to it, super groovy, amazing tones, and you can bang your head to it until cervical radiculopa­thy cripples you. With Jeff Beck, it’s always the tune first, and every brilliant moment of guitar wizardry that he adds on top of it is fantastic.

Joe Satriani, Not Of This Earth, The Extremist, and Surfing With The Alien. These albums have so many great songs, such brilliant use of tones, such amazing arrangemen­ts, and they have defined the instrument­al rock genre for decades, so really couldn’t go by without mentioning them.

And finally there’s Eddie Van Halen, Eruption! What can I even say about it? That one minute and forty-three seconds changed the world foreverQ

EDDIE VAN HALEN, ERUPTION! THAT ONE MINUTE AND FORTY-THREE SECONDS CHANGED THE WORLD FOREVER

 ??  ?? Geoff Tyson with cool Duesenberg Starplayer guitar
Geoff Tyson with cool Duesenberg Starplayer guitar
 ??  ?? Geoff’s new instrument­al album is out now
Geoff’s new instrument­al album is out now

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia