Paddington House: Meet the Owner
Builder Bobby Coulston explains why he used architects to give his rundown cottage in Paddington a new lease on life.
WORKING WITH AN ARCHITECT
Looking to make the most of his new property, builder Bobby Coulston sought the expertise of architects Twohill and James, who gave the formerly rundown cottage in Paddington a new lease on life. Here, he chats with Michelle Bailey about how working with an architect brought value to the home.
Michelle Bailey What were your early ambitions for this project?
Bobby Coulston My idea was to find a “renovator”– a side project that would challenge me and that I could sell when it was finished. Because of this, I was looking for the most rundown house on the best possible street in Paddington, with city views. These types of houses are typically very hard to come by, so I was lucky to find one. This block had a lot of building constraints: a steep street, a sloping block and no side access, which turned a lot of buyers off and enabled me to purchase the site before auction.
MB You work in the building industry and you know a lot about design and construction. Why did you decide to use an architect?
BC My experience is in the commercial and multiresidential sectors; my knowledge of single dwelling design is limited. I knew the market I would be selling to would expect the highest quality product, so I wanted to get a good architect on board to add value to the project.
MB How did you connect with Twohill and James?
BC My cousins and business partner had previously done work for them on Harvey’s Bar and Bistro and we had also worked with David Twohill on renovations to his own home. I was familiar with the practice’s ethos and process, and I liked that they were emerging architects. I thought, if this project was a success, we could forge a long-term partnership.
MB What was it about your first meeting with Twohill and James that reassured you that you would work well together?
BC Our first meeting went really well. We caught up for a coffee and talked about the house and what I wanted to build. I had some budget requirements and certain design parameters I wanted to work with. I was reassured because David and Emma took my comments on board
and were very relaxed about my requirements. I felt like we were on the same page and they were happy to collaborate with me.
MB What delights you most about the design? BC The design pays homage to the old cottage, yet the extension has a modern feel. The house flows well and is really livable and well-suited to the Queensland climate. I love the high ceilings, the honed concrete and the beautifully understated finishes. David gave me some good advice in the beginning: to build something to my taste and trust that someone else would appreciate it for what it is. I love concrete and understand the value in it as a material. I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but people immediately recognize that it feels special.
MB What are you most proud of?
BC I am proud of the whole house, to be honest: the off-form concrete, the big timber windows and doors, the in-situ terrazzo floors, the heritage component of the old cottage and even the grasscrete in the driveway! I’ve learned a lot from this project.
MB What elements of the design would you never have imagined had you not worked with an architect?
BC I would never have imagined doing the pitched roof with the exposed rafters, which are about twenty metres long, nor the garden room.
MB How did the design challenge you as a builder?
BC The design drawings were good to build from. It was the limited site access that made building the project so challenging. I had to dig four hundred cubic metres of dirt with a threetonne excavator. We had to shift and raise the existing house by five metres and then tie back into it with the new concrete structure. The roof sheets for the pitched roof, which were about twenty metres long, had to be carried in by hand by about twelve men because I couldn’t use a mobile crane. It was challenging but achievable; we did it in less than six months.
MB Do you think working with an architect has improved the value of the end product?
BC Definitely. The architectural input has dramatically improved the real value of the project. The house has a real point of difference; you won’t find another one like it in Paddington, certainly not one that works so well to resolve so many site challenges. We’ve had a lot of interest and will likely have a contract signed in the next week.
MB Would you work with an architect again? How did Twohill and James improve the experience for you as an owner and builder?
BC I would love to. I’m hoping it will be on my own house so that I can design and build exactly what I want and not have to cater for the sales market! What impressed me with Twohill and James was that if I thought something wasn’t working, they would find the solution. They thought not just about the artistic side of the building but also the practicalities.
David gave me some good advice in the beginning: to build something to my taste and trust that someone else would appreciate it for what it was.