Macworld (USA)

What we’d like to see in Apple over-ear noise-canceling headphones

Apple needs to do more than slap its logo on a pair of cans.


Over-ear noise-canceling headphones from Apple are hits waiting to happen. They’re also merely the subject of a rumor ( hehf), but it’s a rumor from the mouth of KGI securities analyst Ming-chi Kuo, who might as well be the Oracle of Delphi so far as these things are concerned. Last month Kuo predicted that we’d see these headphones sometimes in the fourth quarter of this fiscal year, in part because

he believes they’d round out the fresh audio hardware lineup we’ve seen from Apple with the Homepod ( go. and Airpods ( go.

There was skeptical rejoicing. After all, it’s already possible to get “Apple” noise-canceling headphones through the Beats brand, so why make a separate, competing set? But just as Apple transforme­d the struggling Beats Music brand into a 38-million-subscriber powerhouse, Apple could work its magic with its own set of “cans” and make the familiar feel fresh again. Here’s what we think it’ll take to realize that vision.


Beats headphones are visually loud. They scream. If the iphone is a Lexus, Beats headphones are souped-up lowriders jamming to Dr. Dre down your town’s main drag with gold chrome streaking through on vermilion fenders. (And, in fact, Apple even makes Beats headphones that look a little like that.) They’re aimed at young buyers. They’re heavily associated with hip-hop. For better or for worse, let’s admit it: A huge chunk of otherwise die-hard Apple fans will never buy them for those reasons alone.

Apple, though, strives for a form of everyman’s elegance that maintains its power across multiple cultures, age groups, and socio-economic background­s. Its products work with blue jeans; they work with tuxedos. For that matter, they age well. That’s why Apple could never merely swap the b on a Beats headset with an apple.

Apple’s take on headphones would also stand out in a crowd, but it’s hard to guess how they might look, considerin­g that over-ear headphones have basically all looked the same for a century. They’re also usually designed with elements Apple

likes to avoid. Lightning cables excluded, Apple usually shies away from making soft products and parts that wear down easily, which means we may see some kind of change to the padding that envelops the ear. With Earpods and Airpods, Apple got rid of cushioning and pads altogether, but it’s hard to see how it will work on an over-ear headset.

But whatever shape they take, they need to be comfortabl­e and pleasant to wear. The current Beats lineup fails in that regard, with review after review for the Beats Solo3 wireless headphones in particular complainin­g about how tight they are.

Form and comfort, Apple. You can do it better.


People who don’t have authentic Apple Airpods don’t understand that much of the fun of using them springs just as much from the secondary features as the decent audio quality. There’s the way the music briefly stops when you pull out one of the buds and starts when you put it back in, or the way you can tap twice on one bud to talk to Siri. There’s the way that even closing the case feels rewarding, right down to the satisfying snap. I find myself looking forward to both taking them out and putting them away.

We’d like to see more of that in Apple’s rumored headset. At this point it’s almost a given that the new headphones will have Apple’s wonderful W1 chip, which allows for some of the tricks mentioned earlier as well as ridiculous­ly easy Bluetooth pairing with Apple devices and improved battery life.

We’d like to see all that, but Apple could go even further than that with other features, such as the Quick Attention mode on Sony’s WH1000XM2 ( go. headphones, which temporaril­y disables noise-canceling so long as your hand’s cupped over one of the speaker cups. For that matter, Apple could add enhanced Siri features that would allow us to, say, change the degree

of noise-canceling by voice alone. Beyond that, I often find myself wishing I could change the volume on my Airpods just by sliding my finger along the side, and such a feature seems far more doable on our larger hypothetic­al headphones.

They’ll also no doubt be much larger than the tiny Airpods, which means Apple should have room to pack them with a much better battery. That’s not only beneficial for our listening enjoyment, but also potentiall­y means we’ll be able to call out “Hey, Siri” to the cans without worrying about battery life as we do when activating the setting on Airpods.

And while we know Apple is trying to distance itself from the headphone jack, it’d be nice to have the option to plug the headphones into a traditiona­l jack when no Bluetooth is available. Knowing Apple’s “courage” (, though, I wouldn’t count on that feature making it in.


If the Airpods taught us anything, it’s that we shouldn’t expect Apple’s over-ear cans to look much like anything we’ve seen from the competitio­n. Apple, after all, is the company that gave us earbuds inspired by the armor of Star Wars stormtroop­ers ( go.macworld. com/amsw), and now that the cords are gone with the Airpods, they look even more like relics from a future that muddies the line between human and android.

That’s exciting for those of us who like good design. But even better, the chance to rethink what headphones “should” look like could be good for all of us as practical consumers. This is important, considerin­g how people use noise-canceling headphones these days. Judging from my vantage point as a pedestrian commuter on the streets of San Francisco, many owners of wireless noise-canceling headphones use them not in studios or on living room recliners, but rather out in the urban world where the environs overwhelm the senses. Elsewhere, they use them for quiet in offices. I’m one of those folks. Once you slap on a good pair of cans like the Bose

Quietcomfo­rt 35 ( go. and switch on the Naturespac­e ( app or some music, everything else slips away.

The problem? Even the impressive­ly collapsibl­e Bose Quietcomfo­rt 35 headphones I use hog much of the space in my backpack when I need to stash them away. It also takes around half a minute to get them down to a stashable size and in the case. If anyone could slim down that design even further while maintainin­g quality, it’s Apple. Consider the convenienc­e of the Airpods. Stowed away, they’re easy to find, but they take up no more room than a box of floss.

Imagine achieving a similar effect with traditiona­l headphones, allowing you to toss them in your bag with hardly a second thought. That’s a bit of a revolution right there.


So let’s get the obvious out of the way: These things need to sound good. Fortunatel­y, we should be good on that front.

Consider the Homepod. It doesn’t look as though it will be the blockbuste­r seller Apple was hoping it’d be, but it clearly shows the Cupertino company doesn’t mess around when delivering high-quality audio.

In fact, most criticisms of the Homepod center on its pitiful use of Siri. Stop the chitchat, though, listen to the music, and you’ll find yourself awash in evenly distribute­d music that sounds the same no matter how we move around the Homepod. Packed with seven tweeter speakers, a four-inch woofer, and six microphone­s that can hear us even over wall-shuddering music, it’s a wonder of design. While Apple’s Airpods can’t touch that level of sophistica­tion, they, too, produce sound of such quality that it’s hard to believe they’re descended from

the relatively tinny Earpods.

All of which is to say that Apple should be more than capable of crafting over-theear headphones that deliver a divine audio experience. But beyond that, it’ll also have to offer super noise-canceling, which

Apple apparently struggled to do with the Beats Studio headphones which were serviceabl­e but paled in comparison to some of the competitio­n. It’s certainly possible Apple can deliver on this front, but whether it can do it without sacrificin­g music quality should be the question that drives any critical assessment of the unit.


We already know that whatever headphones Apple makes are going to be expensive. At this point, that much is a given. The problem is that noise-canceling headphones will bring Apple into a space that’s already crowded with cans that have dizzying price tags. In fact, the competitor­s who already occupy the space seem afraid to go higher in price for fear of losing customers, as both the Bose Quietcomfo­rt 35 and the Sony WH1000XM2 headsets stare each other down with $350 tags. Considerin­g that the Homepod was priced at $350 as well, we could argue Apple itself is playing this game.

Apple may try to justify a higher price with claims of better design or better audio, but it’d be stepping into dangerous territory. The iphone X may have already proved that there’s a limit to the numbers even the most die-hard aficionado­s will pay. And considerin­g that the existing popular headphones already have a well-deserved reputation for quality, Apple will have a tough uphill battle to contend with.

But if Apple sells them at roughly the same price while offering a more appealing design, better affordabil­ity, and (hopefully) better noise-canceling and audio performanc­e? Bose, Sony, and even Beats will be facing a force to be reckoned with. ■

 ??  ?? Shut up and dance, says Siri.
Shut up and dance, says Siri.
 ??  ?? It’ll be hard to get over-ear headphones more portable than this.
It’ll be hard to get over-ear headphones more portable than this.
 ??  ?? The Airpods may be but the proving grounds.
The Airpods may be but the proving grounds.
 ??  ?? These aren’t so bad, though.
These aren’t so bad, though.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Dancing to different beats.
Dancing to different beats.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia