Mercury (Hobart) - Motoring

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

Nissan’s updated EV breaks new ground by giving electricit­y back to the grid AT A GLANCE

- TOBY HAGON

The new Nissan Leaf e+ does its best work when parked. It has ability to power your house and feed electricit­y back into the grid, making the new mid-sized electric hatchback more than just a means of transport. It could keep the lights on — and air-con, toaster, hot water and more — for days.

Otherwise, it’s almost identical to the regular Leaf, apart from a bigger battery pack that unleashes more power.

The 62kWh battery — 22kWh more than the regular Leaf that is still available — adds 115 kilometres to the claimed range, bringing it to 385km.

But it’s the bi-directiona­l charging capability that Tim Washington, the founder of EV infrastruc­ture supplier Jet Charge, believes could be most useful to buyers prepared to take the circa $64,000-drive-away plunge for the e+.

“With the e+ you get another day of electricit­y for your home,” says Washington, who adds it could remove the need to splash out on a home battery.

Similar capacity in Tesla home storage — five Powerwalls totalling 67.5kWh — would cost $59,700 plus installati­on (most homes wouldn’t need anything like that capacity).

“I think it will take a big market away from stationary storage.”

There’s a catch, though. The hardware required for bidirectio­nal charging will cost about $8000 (or more) and still hasn’t been certified, although it has been promised by the end of the year.

Despite the home powering practicali­ty, the Leaf e+ is designed to be driven.

You’ll need a careful eye to spot the e+ over the garden variety Leaf, which continues at $53,190 drive-away.

A body that sits 5 millimetre­s higher is one giveaway — it accommodat­es the larger battery pack — while another is the blue stripes at the lower edge of each bumper.

Elsewhere it’s identical, including space inside the five-seat, five-door hatchback.

Those upfront are well catered for with head and elbow room, although the higher back seats take their toll on hair space.

The lack of rear air vents or USB ports also reinforces the Leaf is more about those up front. And the basic presentati­on lacks the flair of a Tesla Model 3, which also offers more range and performanc­e (but no bidirectio­nal charging) for about $2500 more. There’s also a clunky foot-operated park brake. The boot is a useful 405 litres, although the Bose hardware bolted to the floor could get in the way.

Equipment levels are identical between the two Leafs, each getting the 17-inch alloys, active cruise control, satnav, digital radio tuning, seven-speaker Bose sound system and 8.0-inch touchscree­n with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. There’s also blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, auto braking and parking sensors at either end to complement the 360degree camera.

Another advantage of the bigger battery is its ability to send more electrons, translatin­g to more power and torque from the motor driving the front wheels.

It’s stepped up to 160kW and 340Nm (up from 110kW/320Nm), in turn shaving a second off the 0-100km/h time, now 6.9 seconds.

It’s noticeably perkier and can easily trigger the traction control if you’re eager out of an intersecti­on or roundabout.

The transmissi­on’s B mode brings in more aggressive regenerati­ve braking and feels like you’re grazing the brake gently. E-pedal steps that regenerati­on process up and will eventually stop the car, allowing one-pedal driving in traffic if your judgment is right.

The extra grunt introduces a hint more wheel tugging to the inside of a tight corner as you’re accelerati­ng.

It’s one of the indication­s the Leaf e+ is more about city slicking than smile-inducing in the dynamic stakes.

Maths whizzes may have worked out that the battery capacity has increased 55 per cent but the driving range only 43 per cent.

That’s because the e+ is 142kg heavier so uses about 5 per cent more electricit­y. But with claimed consumptio­n of 18.0kWh per 100km it should cost less than $5 to travel 100km — less than most hybrids.

Slower AC charging is done via the common Type 2 plug , taking between 7.5 and 32 hours depending on what it’s connected to, while faster DC charging uses a CHAdeMO plug. The e+ has doubled its DC fast charging capacity to 100kW, allowing a 20-80 per cent charge in 45 minutes.

From $64,000, plus on-roads 18.0kWh per 100km

NISSAN LEAF E+ 5 yrs/ unlimited km, $1413 for 5 yrs

Space-saver

Electric motor, 160kW and 340Nm

5 stars, 6 airbags, auto emergency braking, lane-keep assist, driver monitor, blind-spot warning 405L

Put simply, this is far too early for front lower control arm bushes to be splitting. They are perishable­s, but must survive longer than three years and your mileage. I raised your case with Subaru Australia, and was told “after further investigat­ion and review, Customer Relations have advised that Subaru will cover the replacemen­t of the bushes at nil cost to the vehicle owner.” Good outcome for you, but it shouldn’t have got this far, and the threat to withdraw the offer of free parts (which don’t cost very much at all) was a bit below the belt.

The luxury SUV segment is busier than the prawn counter on Christmas Eve. It’s very hard to choose just four, so those offering hybrid powertrain­s were favoured as per the reader’s preference. You got a decent deal on your E-Pace, and it’s certainly a stylish, more left-field choice. It’s heavy though, and the more economical diesel variant’s been dropped for 2021.

I agree certain active safety systems can be too heavily relied upon — lane-keep assist and radar cruise control included. It’s up to the driver to use them for what they are — aids to their driving and concentrat­ion. I must say, a 360-degree camera is very helpful for tight parking spaces. No matter how good your driving skills and use of mirrors, that overhead view picks out kerbs and protruding objects very effectivel­y.

Both engines offer a maximum braked towing capacity of 1800kg with a 150kg downball limit. Even so, the 2.5-litre models have all-wheel-drive (the 2.0 just front-drive) and you’ll be grateful of the bigger engine’s extra guts. If you can afford it, go the 2.5-litre as it’ll be better suited for towing. Although dearer still, consider the 2.2-litre diesel CX-5 — a 2000kg capacity, more pulling power and far more economical.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia