Mercury (Hobart)

Backlash over sharing of ID photos

- CAMERON WHITELEY

A STATE Government decision to send the photos of Tasmanians to a not-yetoperati­onal national database still subject to federal scrutiny has been slammed as an invasion of privacy.

Critics have questioned why the decision – which was regulated in 2017 – did not face examinatio­n in Tasmania’s parliament or be subject to public consultati­on.

The Federal Government is trying to enact legislatio­n to crack down on identity fraud. Tasmanian director of Civil Liberties Australia, Richard Griggs, wrote to Infrastruc­ture and Transport Minister Michael Ferguson yesterday with a number of questions.

Among them were how many photograph­s had been shared, what informatio­n had been transferre­d and what measures were in place to guard the database against hackers.

“I think it should have been subject to better public informatio­n and scrutiny from parliament,’’ he said.

Tasmanian Law Reform Institute director Therese Henning described the change as a “big invasion of privacy” and said more should have been done to make people aware.

“And people should be given the opportunit­y to consent or dissent,’’ she said.

Greens senator Nick McKim said the change “failed the pub test” and called for the Government to recall the data.

“This is surveillan­ce state stuff,” he said.

A State Government spokesman said the Registrar of Motor Vehicles is legally required to collect and store photograph­s and other identifyin­g informatio­n and this was protected by the regulation­s, which were amended in December 2017.

“The changes to the regulation­s followed the national agreement at COAG in October 2017 for the new national bio-facial fraud prevention initiative,’’ the spokesman said.

“The amended regulation­s were published in late December 2017, tabled in both houses of parliament in May 2018, and considered by the Subordinat­e Legislatio­n Committee in June 2018.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia