Mercury (Hobart)

Standing up for our firearm laws

The parliament­ary report is welcome, but we need more work to make us all safer, say Roland Browne and Phill Pullinger

- Roland Browne is a Hobart lawyer and vice-president of Gun Control Australia. Tasmanian Dr Phill Pullinger is a rural GP and president of Medics for Gun Control.

EMERGENCY physician Dr Bryan Walpole has described the experience of treating victims in the Royal Hobart Hospital’s emergency department on April 28, 1996, as “like going to war for the day.” On that day 35 people died and many more were injured during the Port Arthur Massacre. Emergency doctors who worked in Tasmania during the 1980s and 1990s talk about shooting incidents and gunrelated injuries and deaths as being an unfortunat­e part of life working in emergency in Tasmania. Today, emergency nurses and doctors can count on their hand the number of gun-related deaths or injuries they encounter. This is because in 1996 Australia’s prime minister, John Howard, was joined by a cross-party coalition of politician­s demonstrat­ing courageous leadership to establish the National Firearms Agreement. The NFA is a nationally consistent set of minimum standards that regulate the licensing and use of guns in Australia. Since then, gun deaths in Australia have plummeted to less than half of what they had been. There were 13 mass shootings in Australia in the 18 years leading up to the Port Arthur Massacre; there were none in the 20-plus years following the NFA establishm­ent (until Margaret River in 2018). A study into deaths from firearms following the NFA implementa­tion and the gun buyback scheme, conservati­vely estimated more than 200 lives a year have been saved. This is one of the most successful and broadly supported pieces of public policy in Australian history. Most remaining gun deaths in Australia are suicides, with men in rural communitie­s over-represente­d. Tasmania is a rural state with the highest rates of gun ownership in the country. Mental health and depression are too common in Tasmania. Strong laws that ensure strict licensing, safety and storage requiremen­ts for guns are critical to saving lives in Tasmania. In this context, it is no surprise that there was a significan­t outcry when victims and survivors from Port Arthur, ambulance officers, emergency doctors, nurses and rural communitie­s heard about the Tasmanian Government’s secret promise to the gun lobby to radically water down gun laws. Thankfully this outcry did not fall on deaf ears. Instead of pressing ahead with law changes, the Government establishe­d a parliament­ary committee to inquire into Tasmania’s gun laws. That inquiry heard from dozens of Tasmanians, experts, health profession­als, survivors, police and first responders to gun violence, all suggesting that Tasmania’s gun laws be upheld and strengthen­ed. We welcome that committee’s report. In particular we support its core recommenda­tion calling on a commitment to the NFA. But also, importantl­y, its affirmatio­n that gun ownership in Tasmania is a privilege and conditiona­l upon an overriding need to ensure public safety. This position has the support of an overwhelmi­ng majority of Australian­s and is strongly endorsed by gun safety groups, police and health profession­als. The committee has also recommende­d actions that are strongly supported by health and gun safety groups, including that: FIREARM SERVICES and medical authoritie­s undertake a formal review to resolve matters relating to the duty to notify concerns about persons believed to have firearms. THE TASMANIAN GOVERNMENT advocates for a nationally recognised firearm safety course. A REVIEW into the theft and usage of stolen firearms is conducted to ensure strong enough penalties to deter offending. ENOUGH RESOURCES are provided to Firearms Services to ensure that background checks and risk alerts are

processed and dealt with as quickly as possible.

Fortunatel­y, the committee has not made specific recommenda­tions to water down gun laws in Tasmania, and this is warmly welcomed.

Unfortunat­ely, a few

concerns do remain, including:

FAILURE TO RECTIFY

Tasmania’s non-compliance with the NFA in relation to gun use by children.

FAILURE TO FIRMLY REJECT the gun lobby’s attempts to weaken gun laws in relation to the use of silencers – instead referring this for national considerat­ion.

We urge the Tasmanian Government to embrace the core findings of this parliament­ary committee report. We encourage it to uphold and strengthen public safety through tough gun laws. There is no place for silencers in a civilised community.

Now is the opportunit­y to reject the fierce, sustained behind-the-scenes lobbying of gun groups. These extremely wealthy groups have not and will not give up in their attempts to try to slowly erode these critical public health and safety laws.

Firearms policy must be set according to public health needs, not the profit margin of those in the gun business.

WE ENCOURAGE THE GOVERNMENT TO UPHOLD AND STRENGTHEN PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH TOUGH GUN LAWS. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR SILENCERS IN A CIVILISED COMMUNITY

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia