Mercury (Hobart)

Glitch in red tape report

- Political Editor DAVID KILLICK

THE State Government is making progress in rolling back red tape and over-regulation, but has drawn criticism for a “copy and paste exercise” from a previous audit report.

Releasing the 2019-20 Tasmanian Red Tape Audit Report yesterday, State Growth Minister Michael Ferguson said the Government was doing an excellent job making life easier for business.

“It’s a document which reflects the excellent work that’s being done by the Government, particular­ly with the work of our red tape reduction co-ordinator,” he said.

“The audit document provides a full list of the (red tape issues) that have been resolved, which is now 84 per cent by the way, last year we were 76 per cent. So we’re seeing that improvemen­t, and tackling those areas of reform that are needed.

“And importantl­y, the document also reflects those areas that we’re still seeing ongoing working.”

The State Government issued its 2018-19 Red Tape Audit in February last year.

The 2019-20 report released yesterday included eight new initiative­s among the 125 reforms in the report with updates on about 15 more.

An analysis of the 2018-19 version of the report, which was removed from the Office of the Co-ordinator-General’s website yesterday morning, revealed that 97 pages in the new report were either identical in content or almost identical.

Large slabs – up to 15 consecutiv­e pages in some cases – were also replicated word-forword in the two reports, except for updated page numbers.

Opposition spokeswoma­n for regional developmen­t and small business Anita Dow said the report was unimpressi­ve.

“This latest report is just a copy and paste exercise from the previous report,” Ms Dow said.

“There is not enough progress in outcomes to justify a very expensive position to oversee this process.

“The Government needs to explain how it can justify this spending at a time when it’s cutting $450 million from essential services and frontline workers.

“This is yet another smokescree­n from a government that is more focused on headlines than outcomes.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia