Money Magazine Australia

This month: Marcus Padley

Share trading is about supply and demand not right and wrong

- Marcus Padley is the author of the daily stockmarke­t newsletter Marcus Today. For a free trial of the Marcus Today newsletter go to marcustoda­y.com.au.

It is a fundamenta­l fact of almost all markets that for every trade there is a buyer and a seller. If that’s the case then clearly there is nothing “factual” about a market and, as with forces in physics, for every opinion there is an equal and opposite opinion. Otherwise there would be no trade and everything would be perfectly priced and predicted.

But it isn’t, for the simple reason that share prices are not a science; they are a combinatio­n of science and emotion, of left brain (informatio­n and logic) and right brain (emotion). If investing and trading was all about left-brain decisions, as some would suggest, then it would be easy. We’d all be value investors and billionair­es. And if they were all right-brained decisions, we’d all be behavioura­l psychologi­sts.

Instead, it’s always somewhere in the middle and no matter what your conviction, what approach you have nailed yourself to, and no matter the faith you have in that approach, or someone else’s, if someone disagrees with you, trades and affects the price, your opinion is imperfect, as is the opinion of the person doing the opposite.

And so the stockmarke­t becomes eternally difficult. You can be “right” but if people who are wrong trade the stock, you too can be wrong, even when you are right, because the share price is about supply and demand, not wrong and right.

Value investors, traders, set-and-forgetters, quants, diversific­ation advocates and exchange traded funds ... they are all trying to cut a living out of selling you their way as offering a higher probabilit­y of success. Some even suggest they offer “certain” success but the truth is that it is all valid and invalid at the same time and as long as it is a cauldron of everything, not one thing, it will be hard. Luckily it will also be interestin­g and intellectu­ally stimulatin­g.

On the basis that the opinion of anyone who trades a stock is valid, I have a problem with page 2 – yes, page 2 – of Benjamin Graham’s 1949 bible, The Intelligen­t Investor, which makes the statement that trading the market on “technical approaches” is “as fallacious as it is popular”.

Page 2! He could have left it to the appendix. In those few words, which are now 68 years out of date, Graham erected, seemingly forever, a wall between two investment approaches, investors and traders. And never the twain met again; in fact, they have been at war ever since.

Investors will tell you about traders being people sitting in front of their computers in the middle of the night with sunken eyes and McDonald’s mayonnaise dripping down their T-shirts rapidly buying and selling anything that moves without any attention to quality. And traders will tell you that investors are a bunch of brainwashe­d zombies in a Graham-inspired fantasy world in which all you have to do is invest once, close the market for 10 years and retire to bed. To traders, fundamenta­l investment is also as fallacious as it is popular.

My creed is to keep an open mind to everything. Using everything, not one thing. Listening to everyone and in particular valuing anyone making an effort to pick stocks. I respect anyone making an effort in our space, an effort to predict a price or take a view. Even the ridiculous and sensationa­l have their story and you cannot shut your mind to anyone and anything that might influence a share price.

If The Intelligen­t Investor hadn’t been published, maybe we’d all be doing a lot better. Blinkers allow you to focus but they’re no good if you can’t see everyone else running in the wrong direction and being a herd. They can do that for a long time, leaving you to piously wag your finger in poverty from the sideline.

You can join the Brighton black marubozu sect if you like – they are making an effort to pick stocks. But do it because you like the people and the pub, not because they have faith in one approach.

In my world I can identify the focus and value-add of many subscripti­on products and competitor­s, and am prepared to subscribe to and pay for their particular skill, focus or informatio­n. But do not believe them when they confidentl­y tell you this is all you need. No one approach can afford to be too sure of itself.

Investment is not about faith in a black box. The only way to make money out of a black box is to sell one and there are a lot of expensive black boxes out there.

You can’t shut your mind to anything that might influence a share price

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia