ARMB must con­sider bet­ter op­tions

Mt Buller News - - FRONT PAGE -

COM­MENTS from John Eis­ner and Charles Street high­light how the pro­posed new road link­ing the two re­sorts will com­pro­mise the ex­ist­ing uses of Mt Stir­ling for the ben­e­fit of Mt Buller.

As I have in­di­cated in pre­vi­ous ar­ti­cles and letters to your pa­per, Sandi Jef­f­coat, for­mer CEO of Mt Buller and I sur­veyed a low al­ti­tude link be­tween the re­sorts.

This link from Box Cor­ner on Mt Buller to Rope Land­ing be­low Tele­phone Box Cor­ner on Mt Stir­ling is a shorter and much bet­ter op­tion as it is be­low the snow line.

Ad­di­tion­ally it would en­hance op­por­tu­ni­ties for both re­sorts rather than have a detri­men­tal ef­fect on the ex­ist­ing uses of Mt Stir­ling.

The Mt Buller ARMB must con­sider bet­ter op­tions rather than the pro­posed north­ern Corn Hill link.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.