Reviews & Ratings
Two nearly identical tablets let us dig deep into the differences.
We just spent a week hearing about the future of Qualcomm’s PC chips. Now it’s time to return to the present. Until the Snapdragon 8cx ( go. pcworld.com/8pcx) comes out around Q3 2019, the battle of Intel vs. Snapdragon is being played out in stores and online, with the scrappy Snapdragon 835 and 850 ( go. pcworld.com/85pc) facing a small army of Intel mobile CPUS.
Should you buy a laptop with a tried-andtrue Intel chip, or an upstart from mobile leader Qualcomm? While it’s generally accepted that the Intel chips offer better performance, and the Snapdragon chips offer better battery life, we had a unique opportunity to dive deep into the differences when we tested two versions of HP’S Envy x2: one with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 835, the other with Intel’s 7th-gen, low-power, Core i5-7y54. Both are shipping products still
being actively sold by HP today.
It’s about as apples-to-apples as you can get. And while the results aren’t surprising, they do highlight the clear choices you can make if you buy today—and the challenges Qualcomm faces as it tries to catch up to Intel.
TWO HP ENVY X2S FACE OFF
The Envy x2s we tested are nearly identical. Both versions feature 12-inch, 1920x1280 touchscreens with pen support, as well as Surface-esque keyboard covers (though the Intel version’s cover is horrible). Both also have 49-watt-hour batteries and run Windows 10.
The Intel Core–based tablet came from the factory with 64-bit Windows 10, while the Snapdragon-based tablet came with Windows 10 in S-mode. For this comparison, we used the option to switch the latter tablet to full Windows 10.
One last note: Although HP only sells the Envy x2 with 4GB RAM/128GB storage configurations, the Qualcomm-based Envy x2 we borrowed featured 8GB RAM/256GB of UFC storage. So while it’s not quite even, the advantage here goes to the
Qualcomm-based tablet.
CINEBENCH R11 PERFORMANCE
Our first test is Maxon’s Cinebench R11. This benchmark is older than the popular Cinebench R15, but it runs on the 32-bit only Arm-based Envy x2. It still relies on a realworld engine used in the company’s Cinema4d (albeit much older at this point.) The test is multi-threaded, and the more cores and threads you throw at it, the faster it gets.
At first glance, the results for the Snapdragon 835 aren’t great. But if you look on the bright side, the Intel chip is only about 57 percent faster. Because the Snapdragon 835 is an 8-core CPU, and because this test is multithreaded, it gets a fairly decent boost, even if four of its cores are low-power “little” cores, and only four are more powerful “big” cores.
To find out the performance of each
individual core, we set Cinebench R11 to run in single-threaded mode. The results are far worse for Snapdragon: The single-core performance of a 5-watt Core i5-7y54 is about 373 percent faster than the single-core performance of a Kryo CPU inside the Snapdragon 835.
TABLETMARK 2017 PERFORMANCE
We next ran Tabletmark 2017. This is a crossplatform benchmark made by BAPCO for measuring performance on Windows, Android, and IOS tablets. It uses custom-written applications for each OS, and each OS’S APIS for basic functions such as photo and video sharing, and browsing. The latest version on Windows 10 supports UWP and was rewritten to support the new OS.
The results are better, but if Tabletmark 2017 is an indication of “business application use,” then the Core i5 is about 200 percent faster than the Snapdragon 835.
WHAT’S HOLDING BACK SNAPDRAGON
We could show more benchmarks with the Snapdragon 835 likely trailing the Core i5 (sometimes by big