PCWorld (USA)

Project Athena notebooks perform better on battery, and Intel has the numbers to prove it

Intel’s trying to steal a little of the spotlight away from Qualcomm.

- BY MARK HACHMAN

Intel’s redesign of the thin-and-light notebook, known as Project Athena ( go.pcworld.com/prat), may have struggled to be more than a name to most consumers. But Intel claims that its design partnershi­p with PC makers has paid off in a way you might not think about: battery-powered performanc­e.

“Performanc­e” is usually synonymous with plugging a laptop in. Unplugging a laptop usually translates to long battery life at the expense of a slower clock speed. But Intel unveiled battery-powered performanc­e numbers alongside the Qualcomm Snapdragon Technology Conference to bolster its design chops.

Intel already has about eighteen certified

Project Athena designs in the marketplac­e, ranging from the Dell XPS 13 ( go.pcworld. com/lp13) to HP Elite Dragonfly ( go.pcworld. com/eldr) to the Lenovo X1 Carbon ( go.pcworld. com/lnx1) and the Samsung Galaxy Book Flex and Ion ( go. pcworld.com/ bkfl). With each, Intel and the OEM engineers work together to design a product that meets a long list of usability metrics, including boot time and app startup, as well as more general performanc­e metrics that Intel calls key

performanc­e indicators, or KPIS.

Intel highlighte­d the performanc­e of a (undisclose­d) non-athena system with an Athena system just to give a look at what you might be getting with its designs. Performanc­e under battery power isn’t something reviewers usually test, but Intel’s convinced it’s worthwhile anyway.

According to Martyn Stroeve, Intel’s senior director of technology marketing, notebook manufactur­ers were optimizing for battery life, and getting a hypothetic­al battery life of, say, about ten hours and twenty minutes. Intel then worked with them to increase performanc­e, but shaved off twenty minutes of battery life as a result.

“It’s still ten hours, but the system was quicker and more responsive,” Stroeve said. “And that’s something that we thought it was worthwhile to share.”

It’s still a somewhat obscure metric, and Stroeve acknowledg­ed that Intel’s struggling with how to put that more front and center with end users. Will it eventually offer some sort of “Project Athena” badge or sticker? Stroeve said they’re considerin­g it, though with no formal commitment to either the program or what it could be called. The message Intel’s trying to impart, though, is that the design work’s being done on Athena machines, whether you realize it or not.

Intel executives holed up in a hotel near Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Summit also reminded reporters about applicatio­n compatibil­ity and performanc­e issues associated with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon

8cx chips ( go.pcworld.com/8cxs), which compete with Intel’s Core chips. But our own testing had already turned up those issues in our Microsoft Surface Pro X review ( go. pcworld.com/sprx), and had proven that the Intel Core i7-powered Surface Laptop 3 (see page 69) was superior to that powered by the AMD mobile Ryzen 7 ( go.pcworld.com/r7c7), too. That testing also uncovered significan­t difference­s in the SSD performanc­e, as well.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Project Athena systems perform better under battery power than their counterpar­ts, Intel claims.
Project Athena systems perform better under battery power than their counterpar­ts, Intel claims.
 ??  ?? Intel’s list of its Project Athena PCS it co-designed with PC makers.
Intel’s list of its Project Athena PCS it co-designed with PC makers.
 ??  ?? The Intel Core i7-powered Surface Laptop 3 is superior to that powered by the AMD mobile Ryzen 7.
The Intel Core i7-powered Surface Laptop 3 is superior to that powered by the AMD mobile Ryzen 7.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia