Pharmacy Daily

Ownership rules appear antiquated

-

INVESTMENT advisory firm, KordaMenth­a, believes the growth of pharmacy banner groups and franchises is making “the current restrictio­ns on ownership and location appear increasing­ly antiquated”.

In an update to its Nov 2018 Pharmacy: An industry at a crossroads report, KordaMenth­a reported that the sector has shifted from “a community based pharmaceut­ical dispenser to a landscape dominated by discount pharmaceut­ical and healthcare retailers”, the company wrote in an article on Mondaq earlier this week.

The report noted that since 2011, large groups have developed a significan­t foothold in the community pharmacy sector.

KordaMenth­a noted IBISWorld Industry Reports - Pharmacies in Australia data showed My Chemist, the parent group of discount giant, Chemist Warehouse, now has the largest market share, 29.7%, while wholesaler, Sigma has seen its banner groups grow from 6.5% in 2011 to 20.1%, with TerryWhite Chemmart’s (TWC) share now at 11.8%.

A Pharmacy Guild of Australia spokespers­on told Pharmacy Daily that while the My Chemist group had cultivated a large market share, the number of pharmacies in the group was not as significan­t as a percentage of all community pharmacies in Australia.

“This is an interestin­g analysis of the pharmacy landscape,” the spokeperso­n said.

“We certainly would not agree with the characteri­sation of the impact of pharmacy ownership laws, which we maintain have a clear beneficial effect for consumers.”

However, KordaMenth­a said the growing market share of My Chemist, TWC, Sigma and Australian Pharmaceut­ical Industries banner groups, highlighte­d a need for reform of the ownership and location laws.

“Irrespecti­ve of the current laws governing pharmacy ownership, anecdotal evidence indicates major players have been able to build large networks of retail pharmacies despite such regulation­s,” KordaMenth­a said.

“As major players grow organicall­y and through acquisitio­n, the current restrictio­ns on ownership and location appear increasing­ly antiquated.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia