Su­per Test: Photo edi­tors

Pho­to­shop has a rep­u­ta­tion as the king of photo edi­tors, but does it de­serve it? Rod Law­ton checks out some con­vinc­ing and com­pelling ri­vals

Photo Plus - - Contents -

We test eight of the lat­est and great­est image-edit­ing soft­ware pack­ages, but you may be sur­prised which comes out on top!

Pho­to­shop is of­ten used as a yard­stick for judg­ing all other photo edit­ing pro­grams, but is that re­ally the right way to look at them? It’s un­likely any other pro­gram will be bet­ter at be­ing Pho­to­shop than Pho­to­shop is (nat­u­rally), but there are many pro­grams that do things Pho­to­shop doesn’t.

For ex­am­ple, a lot of peo­ple don’t like sub­scrip­tion plans. It’s the only way to get Pho­to­shop now, but many pho­tog­ra­phers would pre­fer to pay a sin­gle li­cence fee in the old-fash­ioned way. And while Pho­to­shop is very slick and ef­fi­cient, it does de­mand a cer­tain tech­ni­cal knowl­edge that begin­ners might find in­tim­i­dat­ing. And it’s true that you can cre­ate al­most any ef­fect you can imag­ine in Pho­to­shop, but of­ten only with a great deal of work and ex­per­tise, where many ri­vals bring one-click pre­sets that do all these things in a frac­tion of the time.

Pho­to­shop doesn’t or­ga­nize your pho­tos, ei­ther. You can do that in Light­room, the other half of the Adobe Pho­tog­ra­phy plan, but it means switch­ing ap­pli­ca­tions for dif­fer­ent jobs, and for many pho­tog­ra­phers an all-in-one cat­a­logu­ing, en­hance­ment, edit­ing and ef­fects tool would be bet­ter.

Over the next few pages we’re go­ing to steer a path through all these prod­ucts and choices to find the ones that stand out. Our over­all rat­ings are based on all-round ca­pa­bil­i­ties, but your needs and in­ter­ests may be spe­cific.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.