Sunday Territorian

Office aversion worries bosses

- GARY MARTIN PROFESSOR GARY MARTIN IS A SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND WORKPLACE EXPERT AT THE AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT

WITH a high number of jabs reaching our arms and our determinat­ion to live with the pandemic, it seems things are finally getting back to some form of normal.

Sports fanatics are pouring into stadiums, travellers are getting back into the air, shoppers are hitting the stores, movie buffs are heading back into cinemas and foodies are converging on restaurant­s.

Despite an enthusiast­ic return to our pre-pandemic leisure activities, the same level of joy appears absent when it comes to where we worked before Covid-19 hit – in the office.

After two years of remote working around the nation, a growing number of employers are keen to get employees back into the office.

Yet this seemingly simple matter is proving decidedly tricky to navigate.

Smack in the middle of a tight job market and on the back of “The Great Resignatio­n”, during which workers have changed employers in droves, beleaguere­d bosses have been forced to wrestle with a new challenge that has been dubbed the “The Great Disconnect”.

This widening disconnect has been created by a push by some employers to get people back into offices, only to create a clash with workers who have embraced remote work as the new normal and insist on staying put.

The full extent of our love affair with remote working has been revealed in a survey undertaken by The Future Forum.

The study – which assessed the appetite for remote working of almost 11,000 white-collar workers across Australia, the US, France, Germany,

Japan and Britain – found only about onethird of those surveyed worked from the office every day.

While health reasons are cited by some for their office abandonmen­t, there are legions of white-collar workers who simply do not like the thought of returning to what they consider to be a pre-pandemic way of working.

Unlike those who worked on the frontline, many office-based employees were directed to work from home when employers closed workplaces.

Begrudging­ly, white-collar workers set up makeshift home offices while complainin­g of isolation, technology challenges, endless video calls, a blurring of work and personal lives, longer-thannormal working hours and having to share temporary desk space with others in their household.

While some struggled with the whole remote working set-up, others began to see the upside, including the absence of a time-consuming commute and the benefits of more independen­ce, more flexibilit­y and even increased personal productivi­ty.

A decent-sized bundle of employees enjoyed the experience so much that when it was time to return to the workplace, they preferred to quit rather than return full-time to the office.

There is, of course, a group of employers that has embraced the concept of large numbers of their employers continuing to work remotely on a fulltime and permanent basis.

These employers see themselves as progressiv­e and believe the risks associated with remote working are offset by the many advantages.

Others are staring down the barrel of empty office seats and trying to assess the damage that might come with a diminishin­g sense of community among their workforce.

Their concerns extend to being locked into long-term rental arrangemen­ts and unease that new employees will not get the benefit of learning from more experience­d colleagues.

Unconvince­d of the merits of remote working, these employers are trying to coax their staff back to the workplace.

Some managers have attempted to meet workers halfway by negotiatin­g hybrid arrangemen­ts involving some days in the office. Yet even these arrangemen­ts do not satisfy a large portion of the workforce, who want to continue to work remotely, all day, every day.

Fearing that employees with a preference for working remotely or via hybrid arrangemen­ts will quit if pushed too hard to return fully to the office, many bosses end up with their hands tied.

The hesitancy of some to return to the office has delivered a reality check for employers, many of whom had assumed that workers would approach a return to the office with the same enthusiasm with which they have returned to prepandemi­c leisure activities.

For beleaguere­d bosses desperatel­y hoping to boost their office occupancy, there may be a workaround.

When technology disrupted bricksand-mortar stores and fuelled a surge in online spending, retailers moved to make in-store shopping a worthwhile experience.

With technology now disrupting bricks-and-mortar offices, perhaps employers will be compelled to make the office a worthwhile experience, too.

It begs the question: what might that experience look like?

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia