Sunday Territorian

Australia’s low value on life blocks vital meds

Call for PBS approval reform with life-saving treatments out of reach

- Sue Dunlevy

Patients are waiting longer to access subsidies for breakthrou­gh new medicines because the life of an Australian is priced at just one-third the value of a US citizen.

Pharmaceut­ical companies are delaying launching new medicines in Australia because they get paid more for the drugs overseas. And when they apply for a medicine subsidy here, it takes months – sometimes years – longer before they are reimbursed.

“For every 10 therapies approved in the US, only four make it on to the Pharmaceut­ical Benefits Scheme (PBS), and even then, it takes at least two years for them to get here,” Rare Cancers Australia chairman Richard Vines said.

Australian cancer patients were collective­ly spending in excess of $200m each year of their own money on therapies that had not yet made it on to the PBS, Mr Vines said.

Experts who study drug subsidy outcomes say Australian health authoritie­s value a year of a person’s life at $50,000$75,000 – a third the price of a US life which is valued at $150,000-$225,000.

If a treatment costs less than this benchmark, it is more likely to be paid for by the government. If it costs more, it is less likely to be subsidised.

In Japan, health authoritie­s consider a year’s life to be worth $76,000-$168,000. In the UK, a life is valued at $55,000-$93,000 and for highly specialise­d treatments it can be up to $560,000. In the Netherland­s, its $36,000-$143,000.

Before the Australian government funds new medicines they have to be assessed as cost-effective by the Pharmaceut­ical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). One of the tools this body uses to determine whether a drug should be funded is the price of a year of healthy life, or Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY), that is gained by using the medicine.

By checking the price of drugs the PBAC has approved and those it has rejected, experts consider the price of a QALY, or year of healthy life, in Australia to be between $50,000 and $75,000.

The Department of Health said it did not rely on a set price for a QALY.

“The value attributed to a person’s life in the Australian health system … is often lower compared to the values used in other comparable countries,” Sydney University adjunct professor Brendan Shaw, who previously headed Medicines Australia, said.

A Medicines Australia report found the average time it takes for an innovative medicine to go from registrati­on to being subsidised in Australia is 391 days. On average, more than 60 per cent of medicines in countries including Germany, France, Japan and the UK are reimbursed within six months, compared to only 22 per cent of medicines in Australia.

Medicine and cancer bodies are lobbying the government to change how we assess the value of a life and widen it to include savings to the tax and welfare system that a lifesaving medicine can provide.

Nick Ribbe was told he might survive for just three months in 2021 but now he is married and eagerly awaiting the birth of his twins in July thanks to breakthrou­gh medication not funded by the government. The 32-year-old was diagnosed with an extremely rare liver cancer advanced fibrolamel­lar carcinoma, with no real treatment protocol and a very poor prognosis. His treatment, an immunother­apy called Nivolumab, is not government funded for his condition and costs tens of thousands of dollars a year.

Mr Ribbe had to set up a donation page to raise $100,000 for his care and his treating and support team had to fight for him to access Nivolumab through a Compassion­ate Access Scheme.

“I was initially told that the access scheme was closed and that I wouldn’t be able to get the drug, but fortunatel­y a place in the program became available to me,” he said. “Without it, I’m not quite sure how I would have been able to pay.

“The formal evaluation of human life isn’t valued the same here as it is in other countries. And I think if changing that, or debating that, would mean that it enables people to get better access to medicine then that would be worthwhile and valuable.”

“For every 10 therapies approved in the US, only four make it on to the PBS

Richard Vines

Rare Cancers chairman

 ?? Picture: Sam Ruttyn ?? Nick Ribbe, with his pregnant wife Victoria, was diagnosed with a rare liver cancer but has benefited from an immunother­apy treatment not currently funded by the government.
Picture: Sam Ruttyn Nick Ribbe, with his pregnant wife Victoria, was diagnosed with a rare liver cancer but has benefited from an immunother­apy treatment not currently funded by the government.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia