Tech Advisor

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

From £470 inc VAT

- Paul Monckton

It’s been a long wait, but AMD’s high-end Vega graphics cards have arrived, providing a muchneeded alternativ­e to Nvidia’s enthusiast-grade cards, matching the GeForce GTX 1080 on both price and performanc­e. Building on technologi­es introduced with the RX Fury, the Radeon RX Vega range is a big step up from the Radeon RX 500-series cards (which launched only recently), and includes a host of new features designed to dramatical­ly increase performanc­e.

The RX Vega currently comes in three varieties: the RX Vega 56, the faster RX Vega 64 and a high-end RX

Vega 64 with liquid cooling. Here, we’re concentrat­ing on the standard Vega 64.

Price

We’ve reviewed one of AMD’s ‘own-brand’ reference boards, which isn’t actually available to buy, unlike Nvidia’s Founders Edition cards.

RX Vega cards from partners including ASUS, MSI and others will offer the same level of performanc­e, priced from around £470.

Limited Edition models sell for rather more, at about £600, while the faster water cooled version starts at around £700.

Expect more options to arrive with a wider range of prices once board partners start to ship products based on their own modified hardware designs.

Design

As a replacemen­t for AMD’s previous high-end boards, the Radeon Fury X and Radeon Fury, the RX Vega improves upon the previous design while retaining many core features.

Manufactur­ed using a 14nm process, the RX Vega 64 offers 64 compute units and 4096 stream processors with a greatly increased base clock speed of 1,247MHz, boosting to 1,546MHz under load.

Liquid cooled versions can reach 1,667MHz – an improvemen­t of around 60 percent over the R9 Fury X.

The new card uses the same High Bandwidth Memory architectu­re found in the Fury boards to achieve a memory bandwidth of 484GB/s in a new ‘HMB2’ version. This is a little slower than the 512GB/s

memory on the Fury boards. But Vega doubles the about of RAM from 4- to 8GB – a very welcome developmen­t as Fury cards were often criticised for offering less video memory than some less expensive AMD cards.

Vega also benefits from a new paged memory architectu­re which greatly improves efficiency when reading data over the PCI-Express bus while simultaneo­usly operating as a cache for future data access. This process is managed by a new HighBandwi­dth Cache Controller (HBCC) which allows your PC’s main memory to behave like video memory, potentiall­y giving the Vega chip access to huge amounts of RAM with higher performanc­e than has previously been available.

The Vega architectu­re also includes a new and more efficient geometry engine which is able to more quickly determine which parts of a scene will be visible, avoiding any wasted computatio­n on those parts which will never be seen. It is also designed to speed up numerical operations by varying the level of mathematic­al precision as required.

Vega also benefits from DirectX 12.1 support, rather than DirectX 12.0 which was supported by the Polaris architectu­re found in the RX 500-series. Furthermor­e, you can now connect more ultra-high resolution displays to the card simultaneo­usly with higher refresh rates than before. For example, the Vega RX 64 will allow up to three simultaneo­us 4K HDR displays at 60Hz, where Polaris is limited to a single monitor.

Although the first wave of RX Vega 64 cards are all based on AMD’s reference design, the cosmetic details

of your particular looks will depend on which partner you buy it from. Our review sample which is one of a limited edition batch fitted with a rather fetching brushed aluminium exterior.

We don’t know for how long these versions will be available, but they’re not the best value for money as they do cost around £100 extra yet offer no performanc­e benefit. Limited edition version or not, the reference Vega 64 boards all have a premium metal constructi­on which sets them apart from the less expensive models.

Each board features an illuminate­d ‘Radeon’ logo along its length, with a smaller illuminate­d ‘R’ next to the power connectors. Also included is a row of 8 individual LEDs forming a ‘tachometer’, indicating the current GPU load level.

Unusually for a graphics card at this level, the board comes with only four monitor outputs: three DisplayPor­t 1.4 and one HDMI 2.0b connectors are provided. These allow for multi-monitor ‘Eyefinity’ setups, 4K and HDR.

Despite extensive customisab­le power management settings, the RX Vega 64 board is rated at up to 295W,

or 345W in the liquid cooled version, to allow for higher clock speeds. This is a much higher requiremen­t than a GeForce GTX 1080, which is rated at only 180W.

The RX Vega 64 board also requires two 8-pin PCIExpress connectors and AMD recommends at least a 750W power supply. That’s 50 percent more powerful than the 500W PSU recommende­d for use with a GeForce GTX 1080.

Performanc­e

As part of AMD’s new enthusiast grade product line up and based on entirely new silicon, the RX Vega 64 represents a significan­t step up in performanc­e from the Radeon RX 580.

As you’ll see from our performanc­e results below, it also represents a solid challenge to Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080 in terms of both price and performanc­e.

The RX Vega 64 delivers ample performanc­e for VR and even 4K gaming with less demanding titles,

often outpacing the RX 580 by around 65- to 70 percent. When compared to a GTX 1080 results are much closer, with results often within just a handful of frames per second depending on the chosen game and quality settings. If you’re trying to choose between the two, the decision will vary depending on which games you like to play.

Another important factor is that the RX Vega 64 is, of course, a much newer card than the GTX 1080 and developers have therefore had less opportunit­y to optimise their game code to take full advantage of its new features. We can therefore expect more significan­t performanc­e improvemen­ts on the RX Vega 64 over

time. It should also be noted that the RX Vega 64 has far greater power and cooling requiremen­ts than a GTX 1080, so you’ll certainly need to take this into account if your current power supply isn’t up to the task. Our air cooled sample also gets quite loud when pushed to the limit. This become even more critical if you’re intending to set up a dual card configurat­ion.

Should I buy a Radeon RX Vega 64?

If the price is right for you, then the RX Vega 64 is a sound purchase. It similar performanc­e to the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 at around the same price, while offering newer technologi­es which are yet to be fully exploited. You can also take advantage of FreeSync monitors which typically cost less than the equivalent G-Sync monitors designed for Nvidia cards.

However you may run into issues related to power and noise as the RX Vega 64 needs considerab­ly more power to run, so you may find that a power supply

upgrade is required for the RX Vega 64 which you wouldn’t need for a GeForce GTX 1080.

Those wanting the ultimate performanc­e are still best served by an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti which is much faster, although considerab­ly more expensive.

Verdict

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a much-needed highend update from AMD which delivers significan­t improvemen­ts over the previous ‘Fury’ cards and finally offers a worthy competitor to Nvidia’s GTX 1080. The performanc­e crown still goes to the GTX 1080 Ti.

 ??  ?? 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
 ??  ?? Thief 1080p Ultra (fps)
Thief 1080p Ultra (fps)
 ??  ?? Alien Isolation 1080p Ultra (fps)
Alien Isolation 1080p Ultra (fps)
 ??  ?? Thief 4K Ultra (fps)
Thief 4K Ultra (fps)
 ??  ?? Alien Isolation 4K Ultra (fps)
Alien Isolation 4K Ultra (fps)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia