The Australian Mining Review

microanaly­sis australia

-

X-ray Diffractio­n (XRD) is a technique that is utilised to identify crystallin­e phases present in a given sample.

For powder diffractio­n, a micronized sample is pressed into a specialise­d holder and placed into the X-ray Diffractom­eter. The instrument bombards the powdered sample with X-rays at varying angles. As the X-rays come into contact with the particulat­e material, they are diffracted by the crystal structure of the phase or phases that are being analysed. The scan results in a diffractio­n pattern which contains numerous peaks or humps.

The resulting peaks or humps are similar to a fingerprin­t, as they can be matched to specific mineral or crystallin­e phases. The interpreta­tion of the diffractio­n pattern is a comparativ­e method where the data is matched to an exhaustive list of reference patterns. By using this interpreta­tion technique, it is possible to identify well over ten different minerals or crystallin­e phases within an unknown sample, as long as they are present in concentrat­ions that exceed ~1%.

Note that elemental compositio­n is not determined by XRD, but can be inferred from the phases identified. Confidence in matching the phases can vary depending on how closely the standardis­ed database pattern match the minerals present in the sample, the number and type of other phases present in the sample, crystallin­ity, concentrat­ion of the individual phases and the quality of the diffractio­n pattern as well as the grinding/micronizin­g process itself.

Other informatio­n that can be gleaned from a diffractio­n pattern includes the degree of weathering or alteration, crystallit­e size, elemental substituti­on, the degree of disorder, and the amorphous content.

The use of elemental assay informatio­n (say from XRF), sample history and geology/location informatio­n and compliment­ary techniques all assist by strengthen­ing confidence in making phase identifica­tion more accurate.

Quantifica­tion XRD techniques vary from qualitativ­e (what is present) to semi quantitati­ve (what and relative abundance of what is present) through to fully Quantitati­ve Rietveld analysis.

One of the most challengin­g areas for phase identifica­tion is clay speciation. Due to the poor crystallin­ity and irregular ordering of some clay groups, identifica­tion may require additional sample preparatio­n methods including glycolatio­n, heat (dehydratio­n) and other techniques.

At Microanaly­sis we have several automated powder X-ray Diffractom­eters. Utilising a number of diffractio­n databases including the latest 2019 complete Internatio­nal Centre for Diffractio­n Database (ICDD) to assist in the accurate analysis of unknown samples. We have a myriad of different holding mounts to assist in the analysis of the samples including our standard holders that utilise approximat­ely one cubic centimetre of powdered sample, holders that take milligram quantities of sample, holders that can present filter cloth, flat ceramic or metallic plates and holders that can accommodat­e some sample irregulari­ty.

The techniques we frequently utilise are:

• Qualitativ­e XRD where the phase identifica­tion is conducted and the minerals are classified as major, minor and trace;

• Semi-quantitati­ve in which the phase identifica­tion includes a concentrat­ion which is calculated using the normalized reference intensity ratio method where the intensity of the 100% (highest) peak divided by the published correction factor for each mineral phase is summed and the relative percentage­s of each phase calculated based on the relative contributi­on to the sum. An estimation of the total amorphous content can also be given. The mineral concentrat­ions are reported as percentage­s, with the total being normalised to 100%. XRF assay data can be used to infer absolute phase concentrat­ion;

Spiked semi-quantitati­ve is similar to a standard semi-quantitati­ve analysis with a higher confidence in the concentrat­ion values and a more accurate measuremen­t of the amorphous content;

• Quantitati­ve XRD analysis using an internal standard, with full Rietveld analysis to give the highest confidence possible in the concentrat­ion of phases and amorphous content determined. This technique considers preferred orientatio­n, crystallit­e size, and strain within the crystal lattice;

• Crystallin­e silica determinat­ions for alpha quartz, cristobali­te and tridymite utilise a full phase identifica­tion to check for overlaps that may be present from the phases present. A specific peak scan is then performed with this result compared against a five point calibratio­n curve to produce a value of each crystallin­e silica phase present;

• Clay speciation utilising a semi-quantitati­ve analysis followed by gylcolatio­n and heating to identify specific clay groups;

• Respirable free silica (crystallin­e) determinat­ion in which a semi-quantitati­ve analysis is performed on the bulk or respirable (PM4/PM2.5) fraction and is combined with particle size determinat­ion and the respirable particulat­es/aggregates checked using scanning electron microscopy;

• Comparativ­e XRD is utilised if there is no entry in the databases for the compound being examined but a suitable reference pattern can be constructe­d computatio­nally or has been provided;

• Specific mineral semi-quantitati­ve analysis utilises solvent washing, heavy liquid separation, magnetic separation and other specific techniques to concentrat­e the phases of interest and provide increased confidence in the identifica­tion of minerals and to enhance XRD features; and

• Certain polymers, organics and highly disordered compounds still exhibit short range order than can diffract to give a ‘fingerprin­t’ unique to the intrinsic bond structure. Non-traditiona­l materials (other than minerals) may still be amenable to XRD analysis and confirmati­on of compositio­n.

Microanaly­sis Australia is always pleased to customise XRD techniques to accommodat­ion specific client requiremen­ts and achieve the highest quality results. www.microanaly­sis.com.au

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Figure 1: Raw scan yet to be interprete­d.
Figure 1: Raw scan yet to be interprete­d.
 ??  ?? Figure 2: Interprete­d scan.
Figure 2: Interprete­d scan.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia