The Cairns Post

Are your Christmas gifts safe?

-

THAT big stack of stuff under the tree: we consider it safe as houses because our safety standards are as high and wide as the sky.

Every product in the tinselled and trussed up shops or available online from within our borders has been checked and passed muster, right?

People in the know have ensured the item can’t be sent to the market without passing tests, surely? No and no: that presumptio­n could not be more wrong.

“Safety first” might be an aphorism, but it holds little truth where Australian products are concerned. In Australia, it is not illegal to put unsafe products on the market for sale.

This flies in the face of prevailing notions of a consumer market most consider over-regulated, over-policed and over the top.

Head of CHOICE policy and campaigns Sarah Agar says there are currently no explicit requiremen­ts under Australian law for manufactur­ers and retailers to make sure the products they sell are safe but we blindly presume the checks have been done and standards met.

Their surveys have found that four in five consumers surveyed believe there are legal safety requiremen­ts, protection­s and penalties in place.

But the system relies on a body such as CHOICE testing them against the standards to show that they are failing.

Only a smattering of products deemed high-risk have mandatory safety standards, and almost without exception these are now in place because of a death or a serious injury.

How horrid that someone must die or be maimed to summon basic, enforceabl­e standards to protect those who will come afterwards.

The gate is only effectivel­y shut after the horse had bolted and trampled someone to death. Dreadful.

The products with mandated (and therefore enforceabl­e) safety standards include kids’ gear such as cots and strollers, bikes and aquatic toys. But even then, the protection­s are not as rock solid as consumers might expect. Even when mandatory standards are developed, the recall system on faulty items is largely voluntary in Australia, meaning the manufactur­er chooses when to recall a product and sometimes they don’t do that at all.

For example, CHOICE tested a dozen portable cots in May this year and 10 failed the mandatory safety standards. When contacted, only one manufactur­er chose to recall that cot and the other nine are still available for sale.

In some cases, the compulsory standards are out of date. The cots and stroller mandatory measures were set almost 20 years ago, and the newer standards that were introduced are voluntary.

Everything is in place to introduce a legal obligation on businesses to ensure the products they sell are safe. Early last year, the report of a review into Australian consumer law — a federal legal device — was handed down and in August last year the state ministers agreed to implement the recommenda­tion after consulting with their states.

And there, what looked like a promising, necessary reform stopped dead. It is a restructur­ing that would bring us in line and up to speed with the EU, Canada and the UK. It would catch us up rather than put us at the cutting edge, but that is far preferable to where we are.

We need the newest standards to be made mandatory and therefore enforceabl­e. We need violations to be policed more vigilantly. And we need Australian consumer law to include a requiremen­t that products for sale are subject to safety requiremen­ts.

Until then, we need to speak up when something seems amiss, not just trust that someone else has done the checking and has our back.

Dr Jane Fynes-Clinton is columnist for The Courier-Mail

 ?? Picture: iSTOCK ?? STANDARDS: Most of us assume the products we buy have been safety tested.
Picture: iSTOCK STANDARDS: Most of us assume the products we buy have been safety tested.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia