The Chronicle

How the election will affect Australia’s property market

- BY NATHAN MAWBY

Australia goes to the polls on May 21 and history shows buyers and sellers will elect to postpone their property plans for the next three weeks.

But while real estate experts are tipping fewer transactio­ns in that time, and fewer auctions on election day, now might be a wise time to forge ahead.

Especially for those trying to buy their first home.

Real Estate Institute of Australia president Hayden Groves said elections usually resulted in a majority of buyers and sellers voting to “put their cue in the rack and wait to see what happens”.

“Each and every election, state or federal, the property market tends to slow – but just the level of transactio­ns,” Mr Groves said.

“And, on election day, a lot of agents won’t run auctions or commence marketing campaigns, so that will be another slowdown.”

But with no major policies outlined that would impact the wider market at the time this article was published, he said this year’s election was “just an arbitrary date”.

PropTrack economic research director Cameron Kusher said while sales volumes suffered the last time Australia voted, even an Australian Labor Party plan to cut negative gearing (not part of its policies this year) had not impacted prices.

The nation’s median house price gained $10,000 between April and June in 2019, with the nation going to the polls in May.

But there were outliers, with Sydney’s typical house plunging from $913,000 in April to $870,000 in May, then bouncing back to $890,000 in June.

Mr Kusher said such jumps were common when observing prices monthly, but noted investor markets were more susceptibl­e to politics.

THE 2022 POLICIES

The only gazetted policy from Labor or the Coalition with direct ramificati­ons for the wider market at the time of writing was an expansion of the home guarantee schemes.

Mr Groves said it was good news for the wider market that the major parties would raise price caps for first-home buyers and provide more places for them in the program in which the government guarantees loans for deposits as low as 5 per cent, or even 2 per cent for singlepare­nt families.

“So first-home buyers will come out in droves after the election when they raise the caps from July 1,” he said.

That means the weeks ahead offer a “good opportunit­y” to beat the extra competitio­n into the market for those ready now, a canny move given the expansion might also buoy “the bank of mum and dad”.

Mr Groves said instead of having to choose one child to assist with 10 per cent or more of a deposit, parents might find they could help all of their children by providing a more modest 5 per cent deposit to help them get started.

Mr Kusher said first-home buyers who “rush in now” might also avoid more competitio­n from investors whose activity was currently trending upwards.

In the medium-term, more competitio­n at the affordable end of the market could also maintain demand.

This might keep affordable home prices firm or even prompt rises despite expectatio­ns the wider market will slow this year.

The Coalition and the ALP will also boost funds for social and affordable homes.

OTHER FACTORS

There is another property market-sensitive group that is expected to sit on its hands until after the election: the Reserve Bank of Australia.

The removal of caps on investor lending, a reduction to mortgage serviceabi­lity requiremen­ts and a cut to interest rates swiftly followed the 2019 election and kickstarte­d a recovery after Australia’s last market boom ended at the close of 2017.

This time around, the opposite is expected, with a substantia­l rate rise tipped in June.

Recent economic factors have shown a modest rise in May, but more substantia­l increases in rates are tipped by the end of the year.

An ALP policy to boost wage growth, and other election-linked cost-of-living initiative­s such as a temporary cut to fuel excise, might tempt some buyers to spend more.

But Mr Kusher said while wage growth and cost of living reductions could “to some extent” impact buyers’ budgets, the reality was they would not outpace rate hikes.

The economist said that transactio­n volumes could be more volatile this election, but mostly as it followed two long weekends in April.

SHOULD I WAIT?

Mr Kusher said that past figures hinted any shortfall in new listings before the election would be countered by a post-polls rise.

But winter, another low-stock period for the market, will also hit volumes a fortnight after the election.

With residual stock from busier listing periods earlier in the year still for sale now, buyers might have better odds before they vote.

“And Sydney and Melbourne think the market has had its peak, so sellers are trying to sell now,” Mr Kusher said.

“Plus, buyers want to get themselves into a home before rates rise. So rationally, it’s better to go now.”

Mr Groves agreed, but warned Sydney and Melbourne would likely see more pronounced slowdowns exacerbate­d by affordabil­ity issues after massive home price growth in the past year.

Melburnian­s, meanwhile, might be “proportion­ally, more willing to transact” as the city still had buyers and sellers whose plans were delayed by lockdowns.

“But once the election is over, people will realise that nothing significan­t has changed,” Mr Groves said.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia