The Gold Coast Bulletin

GOLD CAN BE GREEN

ANN WASON MOORE ON CABLEWAY

- ANN WASON MOORE Read Ann Wason Moore every Tuesday and Saturday in the Bulletin

Guys, I think we have an image problem. For years, this city has been building its reputation as more than just theme parks and beaches – as fabulous and world-class as they are.

While rightfully proud of these homegrown features, we’ve been focusing on diversifyi­ng our attraction­s – witness the launch of the $60.5m HOTA art gallery this weekend as an example of an absolute victory.

But while it seems as though we might finally have culture covered, what about that well-worn tourism tagline touting our ‘green behind the gold’?

It sounds great – and it IS great – but does that image of a tourist-friendly destinatio­n match the actual attitude?

Despite the likes of Springbroo­k happily promoting its tourism attraction­s and even boasting its own Chamber of Commerce, it seems there is a disconnect.

Because almost any time we, as a city, try to truly promote our amazing Hinterland in an effort to boost both jobs and sustainabi­lity, it gets shot down.

And never more so than when the c-word is mentioned … the dreaded cableway.

The long, twisted and torturous history of this tourism unicorn is such that one dare not mention the word west of the M1. (No matter that the Kuranda Skyrail was similarly shrouded in controvers­y back when it was built in 1994, but now is considered a stunning ecotourism success.)

Look, I understand the absolutely legitimate concerns of environmen­tal advocates and local residents. This is World Heritage-listed rainforest … one simply does not mess that up.

And literally no one wants to.

Speaking after Urbis advised council in a prefeasibi­lity report that there was “merit” in investigat­ing the city’s potential newest tourist attraction, Mayor Tom Tate tried to immediatel­y assuage concerns.

“I want to ensure that key interest groups are fully involved in initial stages of any discussion­s, and throughout the proposed project,” said the Mayor.

“Of course, traditiona­l owners are paramount but I want to include our city’s environmen­tal groups. I will be asking council to ensure this occurs.

“With that in mind, I ask all parties to come to these discussion­s with an open mind. Let me be very clear – if this project does not meet the stringent environmen­tal conditions, I will be the first to rule it out.’’

Those are pretty strong words.

Meanwhile, Mudgeeraba­based councillor Glenn Tozer is taking it a step further, writing to Environmen­t Minister Meaghan Scanlon and asking the Gaven MP to consider supporting a shared funding commitment to explore the environmen­tal impacts before even starting community consultati­on.

In his letter to Ms Scanlon he said he was “neither for or against a cableway at this time” but the community needed comprehens­ive informatio­n on environmen­tal economics and impact.

“Frankly, without a thorough assessment of the environmen­tal value and impact of developmen­t in the target area, the economic benefit or cost is impossible to determine, regardless of what a consultant might say,” Cr Tozer told residents in a social media post.

And that makes complete sense. Before we touch a single leaf, before we engage in a debate, we better be sure that this proposal is environmen­tally sound.

But all that being said, does it even matter?

Will cableway critics ever be convinced? Even if the findings indicate this is a sustainabl­e and sound ecotourism developmen­t?

Alas, I believe I already know the answer.

Because we’ve been there and done that when it comes to the light rail.

When it comes to this controvers­ial kind of infrastruc­ture, it seems you can’t let facts get in the way of emotions.

The concern with the cableway is that opponents are already effectivel­y ruling themselves out of the conversati­on by the sheer refusal to listen or engage.

Personally, I support the cableway in theory, but if it will cause damage in practice that’s a big no.

What I don’t understand is why the very people whose neighbourh­ood and businesses would benefit from this developmen­t would not welcome the opportunit­y to discuss the ultimate promotion of their green behind the gold.

It’s time to speak up … but also to listen hard.

It’s the only way to ensure we make our actions and our image match.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Open, informed debate about a possible Hinterland cableway will be a balancing act but what is there to lose in talking about it.
Open, informed debate about a possible Hinterland cableway will be a balancing act but what is there to lose in talking about it.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia