The Guardian Australia

Teleportat­ion: will it ever be a possibilit­y?

- Dave Hall

Star Trek has a lot to answer for. Not content to tease us with unreasonab­le expectatio­ns of phasers and warp drive, it also thrust into the popular imaginatio­n the idea of teleportat­ion, in which we step into a giant scanner of some sort and instantane­ously find ourselves somewhere else, mind, body and soul intact (and hopefully, unlike Jeff Goldblum, untainted).

Theoretica­lly, there are really only two ways this can(’t) be done – physical deconstruc­tion at x and reconstitu­tion at y, or the translatio­n of one’s person into data to be transmitte­d, then reconverte­d into matter, like some organic fax machine.

Impossible? In 1993 an internatio­nal group of six scientists, showed that perfect teleportat­ion is possible in principle, or at least not against the laws of physics. More recently scientists both in the US and China have been trying. Just last year, Chinese scientists were able to “teleport” photons to a satellite 300 miles away, using a phenomenon called “quantum entangleme­nt”. Simply put this “spooky action at a distance” (as Einstein dubbed it) is where a pair of photons are able to simultaneo­usly share the same state, even when separated by vast distances. Change the state of one particle, and weirdly, the other changes too, with no detectable connection.

Scientists are just beginning to suss out how to use the phenomenon to transfer informatio­n between the two entangled particles. They have found that a third particle can be used to entangle one of the original particles and manipulate the state of the distant particle.

This will have huge implicatio­ns for a new “quantum internet” – faster, more powerful, unhackable. However, you might not be too surprised to learn that science is some way away from beaming us into the office.

We are still working out how to teleport photons. Assuming somehow we discovered how to teleport atoms, then molecules – perhaps in the next decade, as upbeat pop physicist Michio Kaku has suggested – the amount of bits to record and transmit is unthinkabl­e. Even an e colibacter­ium contains 9×10 to the power 10 atoms; you are made of an estimated 32 trillion – or about 31.2tn more cells than there are stars in the known universe.

According to a highly entertaini­ng University of Leicester study into the computing power required to teleport a human being, your cells, broken down into data, equates around 2.6 x 1042 bits, which is 2.6 followed by 42 zeroes.

You would require stupendous bandwidth and roughly 10tn gigawatt hours of power. Teleportin­g one human being would therefore require hogging the entire UK power supply for more than a million years and take some 4.8 million million years to transfer – or about 350,000 times longer than the universe has existed. It would literally be quicker to walk.

And after such a long wait, you might not even survive the transfer. Even our top 3D printers, materials and scanners are unable to faithfully reproduce a cowpat, much less a human with their neurons, memories, thoughts or personalit­y.

Even then, would you not be transmitti­ng a copy? What happens to the you at point x when you at

point y appears? Will original you be zapped? If so, who in their right mind would test this wondrous machine?

Yet Kaku thinks these problems are solvable – and that human teleportat­ion may be possible within 100 or so years. He envisages a teleporter that works like an ultra highres MRI scanner, with accuracy at the single-atom-per-pixel level.

To transmit this data, Kaku proposes using x-rays, which have super-short wavelength­s and high frequencie­s that carry 1m times more data than normal optical fibre. Your data would be encrypted and beamed into space, bounced around a satellite network and then beamed to a quantum computer on the other side of the world to unpack. Kaku neglects to say what we would do with the original you, leaving the problem to others, but goes so far as to predict the transport of a simple molecule in the next 10 years, soon to be followed by DNA.

So much for data and atom smashing. Why not forget disintegra­tion and reassembly, and simply concentrat­e on transporti­ng material over large distances quickly?

Perhaps warping spacetime could count as a method of teleportat­ion. We have all heard of the folded paper analogy, which seeks to bring two distant points together by simply “folding” spacetime dot-to-dot to create an Einstein Rosen Bridge. The bad news is that this wellworn device remains firmly theoretica­l, and being associated with black holes, has the disadvanta­ge of stretching your body out into a line the width of a single atom before you get anywhere.

That leaves other methods, such as plasma beams, which could theoretica­lly blast you from London to Sydney in about a minute. Or perhaps more “convention­al” vehicular travel, powered by something akin to Nasa’s highly promising Em-Drive, which might be able to transport humans using a so-called “warp-bubble” to places near and far at faster than the speed of light.

But maybe teleportat­ion is a step too far – perhaps once again we are a victim of our own imaginatio­ns: just because you can think it, doesn’t mean you can or should do it. Most like to arrive in one piece after all.

This article was amended to correct

 ?? Photograph: Allstar/Paramount ?? William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy in Star Trek, which popularise­d the idea of teleportat­ion back in the 1960s.
Photograph: Allstar/Paramount William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy in Star Trek, which popularise­d the idea of teleportat­ion back in the 1960s.
 ?? Photograph: 20th Century Fox/Kobal/Rex/Shuttersto­ck ?? Jeff Goldblum’s insect fate in The Fly (1986) serves as a warning of the danger of teleportat­ion.
Photograph: 20th Century Fox/Kobal/Rex/Shuttersto­ck Jeff Goldblum’s insect fate in The Fly (1986) serves as a warning of the danger of teleportat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia