Crav­ing in­sight into ad­dic­tion

The Guardian Australia - - Science / Technology / Sport -

I am a re­tired con­sul­tant psy­chi­a­trist who spe­cialised in the field of ad­dic­tion (Con­stant crav­ing: is ad­dic­tion on the rise?, G2, 9 Jan­uary). My con­clu­sion was that most, per­haps all, drugs of ad­dic­tion were very ef­fec­tive ways of pass­ing time with min­i­mum dis­tress – the anti-bore­dom ef­fect. Even “un­pleas­ant” ex­pe­ri­ences will pass time very ef­fec­tively. Sim­i­lar ex­pe­ri­ences are achieved by shop­ping, TV and sex­ual ac­tiv­ity etc. I thought that heroin and to­bacco were the best anti-bore­dom drugs. Nico­tine is not in­tox­i­cat­ing, the with­drawal symp­toms are se­vere but not ob­vi­ous to the ob­server, eas­ily re­lieved by the next fag, and dis­ease and death are de­layed un­til to­wards the end of work­ing life, thus sav­ing the pub­lic the ex­pense of a pen­sion. The ideal drug?

Dopamine is in­ci­den­tally in­volved in ad­dic­tion. The func­tion of dopamine ap­pears to be in a sys­tem or sys­tems for the ini­ti­a­tion and main­te­nance of our be­hav­iours – the way we think, feel and act. These sys­tems could be called sys­tems for it­er­a­tion.

Lack of dopamine in the brain, Parkin­son’s dis­ease, shows up as a grad­ual loss of the abil­ity to ini­ti­ate ac­tions at will, so pro­gres­sively you are less and less able to will your move­ments – a fail­ure in the sys­tem of it­er­a­tion. Parkin­son­ism is of­ten ac­com­pa­nied by tremor or shak­ing; its other name is paral­y­sis ag­i­tans. The drug L-dopa in­creases the avail­abil­ity of dopamine in Parkin­son­ism and en­ables it­er­a­tion and move­ments to re­turn.

The in­crease in, and per­haps ex­cess of, dopamine in ad­dic­tions and some other be­hav­iours may as­sist their ini­ti­a­tion and use, of­ten overuse, but the up­stream ef­fect would be, in my eyes, that the drugs etc ac­ti­vate the an­ti­bore­dom ef­fect. You might say you take the drug etc and this re­lieves your bore­dom so you take or do it again, thus in­volv­ing the dopamine it­er­a­tion sys­tem lead­ing to ad­dic­tion by an as yet un­known mech­a­nism. We must es­cape from over­sim­pli­fi­ca­tion, even if the cur­rent dopamine story of­fers a sat­is­fy­ing moral­ity tale.Dr David Mar­jotWey­bridge, Sur­rey

• Im­plicit in the ex­ten­sive anal­y­sis of cur­rent ad­dic­tions is a pos­si­ble way of see­ing the prob­lem in a light which might pro­mote co­or­di­nated and ef­fec­tive ac­tion. We are rightly con­cerned about the pos­si­ble con­se­quences of our phys­i­cal en­vi­ron­ment and its pol­lu­tants. It is only a small step from this to un­der­stand that our men­tal, so­cial and cul­tural en­vi­ron­ment may have an equally dev­as­tat­ing ef­fect on our lives.

Pro­fes­sor Terry Robin­son is quoted as not­ing how our an­ces­tor hunter­gath­ers sought sweet foods as nat­u­ral sources of en­ergy, and in this there is much to be learned from un­der­stand­ing the evolved re­al­i­ties of what we are in essence – as op­posed to what we are ca­joled, bul­lied or conned into be­liev­ing that we are or must be. Junk food, in to­day’s cul­ture, leads to the obe­sity and worse which the “evolved re­al­i­ties” of our (nat­u­ral) di­ets would avoid.

Sim­i­larly, if the cri­te­ria of hu­man well­be­ing are pre­dom­i­nantly re­duced to money and ma­te­ri­al­ism, our minds and per­sonal in­spi­ra­tions at­ro­phy or even van­ish. Drugs, gam­ing, porn or sex­ual ob­ses­sion sub­sti­tute as dis­trac­tions. We need to fo­cus on, and be crit­i­cal of, the cul­tural-so­cial en­vi­ron­ment in which we live as much as we do on the phys­i­cal en­vi­ron­ment which we now know can be so harm­ful.Dr Ian Flintof­fOx­ford

• Join the de­bate – email­guardian.let­[email protected]­guardian.co m

• Read more Guardian let­ters – click here to vis­itgu.com/let­ters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian read­ers?Click here to up­load itand we’ll pub­lish the best sub­mis­sions in the let­ters spread of our print edi­tion

‘Nico­tine is not in­tox­i­cat­ing, the with­drawal symp­toms are se­vere but not ob­vi­ous to the ob­server … The ideal drug?,’ won­ders Dr David Mar­jot.Pho­to­graph: Bruno Vin­cent/Getty

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.